well that summed up for me...thanks for putting it up so i dident have to make the effort into writing it.Kharloth said:Three times a day roughly.
For the morning, afternoon and nightime wanks. I'm not afraid to admit it.
well that summed up for me...thanks for putting it up so i dident have to make the effort into writing it.Kharloth said:Three times a day roughly.
For the morning, afternoon and nightime wanks. I'm not afraid to admit it.
That must chafe a bit.Kharloth said:Three times a day roughly.
For the morning, afternoon and nightime wanks. I'm not afraid to admit it.
Possibly disconcerting fact: if you are not circumcised, the danger of chafing when masturbating is greatly diminished. Plus, you don't need to use lubricant of any sort if you don't want to.Biffin Bridge said:That must chafe a bit.Kharloth said:Three times a day roughly.
For the morning, afternoon and nightime wanks. I'm not afraid to admit it.
I haven't given up -- I was never part of the relationship game to begin with. I have never experienced any kind of inclination to find a partner to act out sexual or romantic things with. Some other asexuals do feel an inclination to have a long-term romantic partner and, if their partner is sexual, they may have compromise sex with them or allow them to have sex outside the relationship, whatever works for the relationship. I know asexuals who managed to marry, have kids, and maintain their marriage well into their 40's despite secretly not only finding sex unenjoyable, but also being repulsed by sexual acts.Eclectic Dreck said:Asexual means "not sexual". I thought that was obvious. The reason I say that such a person has nothing of value to contribute is simply that their sexual orientation is defined by a lack of sexual orientation. They have plenty of things to teach me about a lack of sexuality but nothing of value to tell me about sexuality.Verp said:Uh, so a person of different sexual orientation than you cannot possibly have anything to say about human sexuality that would give you more perspective on your or anyone else's sexual orientation? Good to know that you are very open-minded and inherently curious about yourself and the world that surrounds you.Eclectic Dreck said:Also, my response to anyone claiming to be "asexual" is to roll my eyes and disregard any following statements they have on the subject of sex because I assume they're lying in some form or fashion (either to me or themselves) or because if they are being honest that they have nothing useful to say on the subject of sexuality. Bacteria are asexual and I've never bothered asking E. Coli for advice in the bedroom.
And, besides, one would have to work very hard to convince me that being "asexual" was even a thing to begin with. It sounds like code for "I have never had luck in a relationship so I've given up" which is not a decision regarding sexuality so much as it an easy way to rationalize away a perceived deficiency in the area.
But, that said, I will humor you. When you say that you are "asexual", what do you mean exactly. It is entirely possible that the problem all this time is that asexual is being used in a non-literal context and I've simply misinterpreted what people mean.
Porn isn't degrading to women, it's degrading to his penis. :OBiffin Bridge said:That must chafe a bit.Kharloth said:Three times a day roughly.
For the morning, afternoon and nightime wanks. I'm not afraid to admit it.
Well, being on their knees and drowned in spunk is a little different to seeing a deer cross a meadow.Pirate Kitty said:No, seriously: what? How does a moving image of people degrade women? I suppose The National Geographic degrades animals, then too.Woodsey said:Women are free to choose to do what they want you see, but as soon as certain people see them doing stuff they don't agree with then suddenly they're degrading themselves. Hypocrisy is just grand.
Or I just didn't feel like answering?Woodsey said:Nice dodge of the question by the way, although I'll take it your lack of an answer is a "yes, often".
I didn't, Eclectic Dreck didPirate Kitty said:Lol. Did Verp just make that statement? Am I reading something wrong?Verp said:And, besides, one would have to work very hard to convince me that being "asexual" was even a thing to begin with. It sounds like code for "I have never had luck in a relationship so I've given up" which is not a decision regarding sexuality so much as it an easy way to rationalize away a perceived deficiency in the area.
Guess they haven't read of or heard the millions of studies and extensive documentation that has been developed by the medical community over hundreds of years.
Quite a few of those women in the porn industry actually like the submissive role. So do the men, if you have ever seen a simple POV in which the male is the dormant one. If these women (and men) did not choose out of free will, and consent and sign the forms with full cognitive function intact at the time to perform what they do, then that is the point in which it degrades the gender in a harmful manner. Positive sexual degradation (or playing the submissive/dominant role on purpose) is just a style of sexual foreplay/intercourse.Woodsey said:Well, being on their knees and drowned in spunk is a little different to seeing a deer cross a meadow.Pirate Kitty said:No, seriously: what? How does a moving image of people degrade women? I suppose The National Geographic degrades animals, then too.Woodsey said:Women are free to choose to do what they want you see, but as soon as certain people see them doing stuff they don't agree with then suddenly they're degrading themselves. Hypocrisy is just grand.
Or I just didn't feel like answering?Woodsey said:Nice dodge of the question by the way, although I'll take it your lack of an answer is a "yes, often".
(And I was joking on the second point).
[sub]And it's seen as degrading because they're often being submissive to the men.[/sub]
You do realize most of the time that is a character portrayal in which those women are playing for the sake of the scene, right? Most individuals, both male and female when entering the pornography industry, tend to have a good idea at what the work entails. And most of them are exhibitionists, which by the term, they have a good time actually, you know.. exhibiting for other people.Still Life said:I used to dabble with pornography, for a time. I lost all taste for it when I watched a video with a girl who could only barely be considered an adult.
I will never forget the look of confused innocence in her eyes as she was exploited for the camera.
I still feel disgusted and ashamed of myself.