I know, nothing is perfect but I'm curious as to what games you guys can think of where there is nothing you would change or improve on.
Well I don't know about the original PS2 version(never played it)but the Wii version could have done with better brush recognition.It just seems to be completely random whether the game will recognise the shapes you've drawn or not.Quite frustrating at times.That's something I would definitely changeEclpsedragon said:Okami,
I wouldn't change a thing about that game.
I played the PS2 version and didn't really have this issue. Everybody said Okami was meant to be played on the Wii, but I thought the PS2 controls worked much better. The Wii controls may have been better now with Wii motion+MetalDooley said:Well I don't know about the original PS2 version(never played it)but the Wii version could have done with better brush recognition.It just seems to be completely random whether the game will recognise the shapes you've drawn or not.Quite frustrating at times.That's something I would definitely changeEclpsedragon said:Okami,
I wouldn't change a thing about that game.
I'd have to dispute this. I love Crysis, except I always have to qualify that statement by saying I love the first half of Crysis. The visuals are amazing of course, and the gameplay is smooth, natural and best of all, fun, but the near total abandonment of freeform gameplay in the latter half of the game is, in my view, a huge flaw in an otherwise excellent game.endtherapture said:Crysis is simply the best shooter ever made, great pacing, great innovative freeform gameplay and great graphics. I didn't even mind the VTOL section.
Pretty much this- every game could do something better, be it graphics, gameplay, story, characters, or providing free hookers with pre-orders.erttheking said:Not really, something is going to have some flaws, no matter how minor. Besides, perfection is subjective.