Poll: Game Review - Red Faction: Guerrilla

Earthbound Engineer

New member
Jun 9, 2008
538
0
0
I started playing Red Faction:Guerrilla for the Xbox 360, and to my surprise, I was quite impressed with the all-round quality of the game, although I preferred the online multiplayer. I personally thought it was a huge improvement from the first Red Faction game, which I was not too fond of. I quite liked the fully destructible environments, however, as with most shooters, there were some plot holes in the storyline. The graphics were pretty decent, and I loved the non-linear game play, but it certainly couldn't have hurt to put in a 1st person/3rd person toggle switch.
 

StarStruckStrumpets

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,491
0
0
I'm sorry, but this is the worst review I've ever read. It's way too short, has nothing about the in-game systems or engines. Much more detail is needed, MUCH more.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Ok. Let's get something straight here. A paragraph is not a review. You need at least 800 words. Please?

StarStruckStrumpets said:
I'm sorry, but this is the worst review I've ever read.
Don't say that: there have been worse. There were two Halo 3 reviews a while back that made my bones quiver with editorial-based rage.
 

Earthbound Engineer

New member
Jun 9, 2008
538
0
0
StarStruckStrumpets said:
I'm sorry, but this is the worst review I've ever read. It's way too short, has nothing about the in-game systems or engines. Much more detail is needed, MUCH more.
scotth266 said:
Ok. Let's get something straight here. A paragraph is not a review. You need at least 800 words. Please?
I realize that, I really didn't feel like typing ten pages of bullshit that no one would spend time reading anyway. I was simply generalizing, I wasn't trying to explain the thermodynamics and quantum theory of the game.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
punkhead58 said:
StarStruckStrumpets said:
I'm sorry, but this is the worst review I've ever read. It's way too short, has nothing about the in-game systems or engines. Much more detail is needed, MUCH more.
I realize that, I really didn't feel like typing ten pages of bullshit that no one would spend time reading anyway. I was simply generalizing, I wasn't trying to explain the thermodynamics and quantum theory of the game.
Well, but that's the thing that makes The Escapist different from most places on the Internet. We WANT you to type all of your feelings on every aspect of the game, so that we can sit back and help you edit your work in order to improve it.

This was indeed a very short review, but honestly I've read much worse on this site.
 

Kubanator

New member
Dec 7, 2008
261
0
0
This review is fine. It covers story, graphics, gameplay, and multiplayer. He just didn't explain his reasoning. No need to spaz out about it.
 

demmalition1

New member
May 26, 2009
173
0
0
Am I honestly the only person who wasn't impressed? I personally think that the graphics are a bit dated and that the vehicles are too loose in their driving (even though Mars is smaller; less gravity) I think that they should tighten the driving so you don't drift as much.
 

Sharpeye42

New member
Mar 26, 2009
315
0
0
punkhead58 said:
I realize that, I really didn't feel like typing ten pages of bullshit that no one would spend time reading anyway. I was simply generalizing, I wasn't trying to explain the thermodynamics and quantum theory of the game.
I see were your coming from but you could have at least gone into a bit more detail
 

NoNameMcgee

New member
Feb 24, 2009
2,104
0
0
Sorry, but this isn't a review, its just a paragraph about the game.

But on the subject of the actual game - I played the demo and really enjoyed it, it was good mindless fun, but I have a feeling it has the capacity to get boring after a while. Could anyone who has played the full game recommend it to me?
 

Lumpybob

New member
Jul 3, 2009
7
0
0
Alright, Red Faction: Guerrilla. In one word, Underwhelming. After the training mission to get the player used to the demolition mechanics, you are thrown into the Sandbox with a semi-clear goal, and a vague idea on how to achieve it. Oh, sure, the demo's ending made it seem like there are oodles of missions, and endless fun to be had, tearing up the surface of Mars, blasting any EDF in your way, but in actuality, there are only 20 story missions, if even. Most of the games's missions are filler, the generic Attack X; Defend Y; Blow Up Z; and
Move Item A to Point B. And the game makes you do some of the side-quests before you can continue with the story, a very bad way to lengthen a game IMHO. The story missions, the few that were there, were enjoyable to play, and each was a fairly different experience

The destruction mechanic is fairly fun though, with every building being destructible with many different tools, from the Sledgehammer to Remote Charges to Car Bombs, and on my first (and only) play through, it felt well integrated. There is a cover system, like in many of the thrid person shooters, but I didn't use it much, finding it easier to run in circles around the seemingly inept EDF. The Bad Guys's (EDF) are everywhere, and the game takes emphasis on you to act like a Guerrilla, as head on assaults usually resulting in Death, with Death resulting in respawning at the nearest safehouse.

If any parts of this game sound familiar, it because the games looks, feels, and plays much like Mercs 2, just less buggy, and on Mars. All in all, maybe worth renting, but I certainyl wouldn't have shelled out $60 USD for a reskinned Mercs 2.
 

sln333

New member
Jun 22, 2009
401
0
0
Rego89 said:
if this review reflects the game, im not impressed by either
Lol, there we have it. This isn't a review it's just your quick opinions of the game. You should have posted this in the gaming discussion section. If you want to write a review it has to be longer and detailed. Look at some other reviews for an idea. As for the game, it looks alright. Reviews have been positive and it seems like good explosive fun. Not one that impresses me enough for a purchase.