Poll: Invincible Or Immortal

Recommended Videos

elilupe

New member
Jun 1, 2009
533
0
0
Definately immortal. To see advances in technology and all that would be fantastic
 

Downfall89

New member
Aug 26, 2009
330
0
0
Prometheous said:
These two concepts are similar in that they both obviously avoid death in some way. Immortality takes death by old age out of the picture, while invincibility protects you from harm (for the purpose of this survey, invincibility does not protect from deterioration of cells. a.k.a old age).

So if you had to choose, would you live forever or live a life without injury (and why)?

P.S Trust me, I know the speed of your cells' independent degeneration is indicative of your invincible longevity so theoretically it doesn't make sense, but frankly neither of things are possible. So, which would it be?
Just a thought, if you are immortal, you still feel pain yes? And if you were invincible, likewise would you feel any pain?

OT: I'd probably want to be invincible. Life would get boring eventually.
 

Srkkl

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,152
0
0
Invincible, then I could live the greatest life of surviving a skydiving accident to getting the Congressional Medal of Honor.
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
Immortality without some measure of invincibility or otherwise improved durability isn't immortality. Circumstances beyond your control will always have the power to end your life, and random chance determines when that may or may not happen. As an immortal you're rolling the same dice as everyone else - you're just doing it for a potentially longer period of time. Eventually you'll hit snake eyes, and a plane will crash into your house.

I'd choose invincibility because there's no chance I'd be cheated out of my gift.
 

Last Bullet

New member
Apr 28, 2010
537
0
0
Invincibility, no doubt. Immortality would get really depressing after a while. Plus, I would be the ultimate super-soldier. I'd use a nuke as a melee weapon. I guess the main reason I want to be invincible is... well, so I can be an idiot.
 

Dxz5roxg

New member
Aug 19, 2009
352
0
0
Invincibility would be so much better. If I was just immortal then I could be in some kind of horrible accident and end up just a disembodied head for millions of years.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Immortal, maybe if I lived long-enough I could invent a starman and fix my other problem. Music would get annoying though.
 

viking97

New member
Jan 23, 2010
858
0
0
blaze96 said:
Invincible, immortality comes with the very distinct disadvantage of living to see every friend, family member, or lover die before me. This is not just for a lifetime, but for all eternity should I never be killed by outside means. Not just my theoretical children, but grandchildren, great grandchildren, hell my entire family could die. I would also have to watch any friend I make in all of history die, and any girlfriends or wives I have as well. Immortality is really a slow torture, where either you have to suffer heartbreak and saddness again and again or you become a shut in at some point to avoid the pain. If you take option two, you are pretty much dead already. With invincibility, I can live a normal side life and still die at the same time as anyone else would be expected to. The child outliving the parent, rather than the other way around.
well actually, considering you invincible you'll probably outlive most everyone you know. think about it, you'd never get sick and no matter what happened you'd always be in perfect health. you would even be able to kill your self because, depending on what kinda of invincibility this is, the bullet will bounce off your fore head, or you'll just heal up and spit it out.

OT i'd probably immortality.
i say probably because it really depends on the details. if invincibility means i also get superhuman strength, then i pick that.
if immortality means i don't age physically past, oh- twenty three or somewhere around there and i don't die of illness then i'd pick that.
 

Sope

New member
Apr 29, 2010
10
0
0
I would pick invincible, because being immortal would be terrible. All the relationships you make would end in about a century and after a few centuries time, either all relationships you make will be hollow, or you might fall into crushing depression because everyone you ever know will die and leave you behind. Though, if other people were immortal too, then maybe immortal.
 

RadiusXd

New member
Jun 2, 2010
742
0
0
well, immortal means that you'll never die, so really what you mean by that is either ageless or just protected from death by old age.
invincible means you can't be harmed, so you can't experience pain or recive damage.
i would choose immortal if it meant eternal youth as well, looking like charlie buckets grandparents for all eternity telling people that they smell like peanuts would be the very definition of miserable existance.

One other important question, would i be able to have hairhuts and shave and stuff if i were invincible? i think the importance of that can't be overstated.
 

Piorn

New member
Dec 26, 2007
1,097
0
0
Immortal. As long as I can still die when the world ends, it's fine with me.
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,850
0
0
Aby_Z said:
Invincible. Living forever would be worse than any hell.
This. I would never want to outlive everyone I knew. Imagine the horror of watching everyone you love die while you sit and wait as the world become more and more unfamiliar.

I'd much rather be able to be invincible and live through an accident.
 

masher

New member
Jul 20, 2009
745
0
0
The idea of living -forever-... just doesn't sit right... it sounds terrifying. At first there's the sorrow of -everyone- dying around you... than that feeling gets boring, and then what? What do you do when you're -bored- with emotions?

Off topic: my favorite quote regarding Immortality is "At first I went insane, but than I got bored of that, too."
 

Wither

New member
Nov 19, 2009
81
0
0
it is kind of a hard question. invincible, i die of old age, but , as a great man once said, on a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone becomes zero. if i live for a billion years, chances are at some point i will be in a car crash or airplane failure. ultimately though, i wanna live forever.
 

nart_21086

New member
Nov 19, 2009
179
0
0
Aby_Z said:
Invincible. Living forever would be worse than any hell.
Agreed. Plus if I were to be immortal my mind would be destroyed anyways due to the amount of time alive and the increasing number of jag-offs in the universe.
 

Agent_Nahmen_Jayden

New member
Jun 28, 2010
388
0
0
I would be immortal, then when they find a way to time travel I would decide whether or not to go back in time, and if I ultimately hate my exsistence I would tell my past self to just choose invincibility. Everything would be erased from my memory at that point so it's like nothing happened.
 

joshuaayt

Vocal SJW
Nov 15, 2009
1,988
0
0
Do you mean immortality or biological immortality? Immortality is eternal life- infinite life- it CANNOT and will not end.
Biological immortality would mean no Senescence, and nothing more, like that cool jellyfish. You can die, it just won't be caused by age.
If you mean the former, I'd pick it. If you mean the latter, I'd pick invincibility.
Either way I'd become a superhero.
 

Lem0nade Inlay

New member
Apr 3, 2010
1,165
0
0
Hmmm...Immortal. Because the idea of living forever really appeals to me. The idea that I could perfect all my skills and be whoever I wanted to be.

So yeah, Invincibility is cool but Immortality is cooler (IMO).
 

RadiusXd

New member
Jun 2, 2010
742
0
0
Agent_Nahmen_Jayden said:
I would be immortal, then when they find a way to time travel I would decide whether or not to go back in time, and if I ultimately hate my exsistence I would tell my past self to just choose invincibility. Everything would be erased from my memory at that point so it's like nothing happened.
ahhhh see, see what you did just now, you've made yourself a paradox!
if you go back in time to tell yourself to pick invinciblity, then you won't have lived forever and made a time machine, therefore you can't have gone back to tell yourself to pick invincibilty. therefore you will be immortal afterall.
to quote the big bang theory, "this is a classic rookie time travel mistake".