Newsweek has a nice article on this, basically he hired (or is going to hire) a prison consultant, to try and negotiate a lower security prison. Since the sentence he received means he'd go to a maximum security jail, and they'd prefer to get him down to medium to more or less give him a chance at serving his sentence a bit before dyingzacaron said:I think it would be funny if he lived another 150 years and they had to let him out
He was convicted of 20 or so ~10 year crimes (Those aren't the actual numbers, but you get the idea). The punishments stack.Martymer said:Too harsh. I don't get why some countries give such long sentences. I get life, but I don't get something like 150 years. Nor do I get something like 30 years, even if the person receiving it is young. When he gets out, he's fucked. He's never gonna get a job, never be able to start a family... He might as well have gotten life, because that would be more humane (yet it's considered a worse punishment???). IMO, it should be like, anything over 10 or 15 years -> life.
I'm pretty sure a $65 Billion ponzi scheme effects far more people than a bank robbery...Krakyn said:I think a life sentence is too long for a regular white collar crime, but this was what, like a thousand counts of the same crime? I mean, it adds up right, but I feel bad that the guy's going to die in prison. For robbing one bank unarmed, he wouldn't get life in prison but he'd probably affect just as many people.