Poll: Portal: FPS or Puzzle?

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
Sorry, many people seem to mention this, but I would like to know what you consider Portal more to be.
A lot of people consider it to be a Puzzle, and many consider it to be an FPS without bullets.
I consider it to be both, but this poll isn't about that.
It's what you consider it more to be.
Anyways, happy gaming!
 

MindBullets

New member
Apr 5, 2008
654
0
0
It's definitely more puzzle than FPS.

Just because a game is played in first person doesn't mean it's an FPS.
 

aussiesniper

New member
Mar 20, 2008
424
0
0
I say it's a puzzle game. in a normal FPS, you spend most of your time either:

a) blasting your way through wave after wave of enemies who charge suicidally at you (unless it's a "tactical" FPS, where you sneak up on an enemy who wants to carge at you)
b) picking up ammo from the dead enemies
c) walking around/sprinting around while looking for medkits

portal does not have these, therefore it's a first-person puzzle game (FPPG?).
 

GrimRox

New member
Feb 22, 2008
189
0
0
It's definitely a puzzle game if I had to pick one. The gameplay is built around solving puzzles rather than blasting through swathes of enemies. Even when you went up against the final boss it was a puzzle.

I'm liking Aussiesnipers FPPG term!
 

YeOldeMunger

New member
Nov 28, 2007
73
0
0
I can't quite see how you could classify it as FPS to be honest. I mean it's there in the title... 'shooter'.

You don't exactly shoot anything, you just place portals. If we're talking ergonomics then I'm sure the device is just like that to provide people a familar setting. I guess people could argue that you 'shoot' portals, but that really is stetching the definition of 'shooter' to the limit.

I mean, the game is solving puzzles and you just happen to do it in first person mode. I'm totally with the whole FPPG, although that does seem to needlessly sub-classify something.
 

Voodoo Child

New member
Dec 13, 2007
229
0
0
MindBullets said:
It's definitely more puzzle than FPS.

Just because a game is played in first person doesn't mean it's an FPS.
QFT, and liking FPPG as a term.

Also, (offtopic) you avatar is from Attack of the Graske, no?
 

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
Yeah... I'm not saying that it's one or the other... but many people seem to consider it an FPS without bullets. It is a cross, but it's more puzzle, in my opinion.
 

jezz8me

New member
Mar 27, 2008
587
0
0
genres are decided by multiple conventions not just one

If the definition of a first person shooter was simply a game in first person where a gun is all that is seen of the player most of the time then it would be an FPS but FPSs are more than that so it is a puzzle game.
 

MindBullets

New member
Apr 5, 2008
654
0
0
Voodoo Child said:
Also, (offtopic) you avatar is from Attack of the Graske, no?
It might be. I don't really know where it's from, other than it's Doctor Who. If I'm honest, I nicked it from someone else's avatar on another forum. :)

Oh, and who voted FPS? I want to see them justify that choice!
 

KaynSlamdyke

New member
Dec 7, 2007
74
0
0
Puzzle. There's no shooting. Therefore, can't be an FPS, which is defined by that verb.

An FPS without bullets is Heretic. An FPS without shooting is non-existant, because otherwise we'd have to call The Elder Scrolls series one (and technically, that'd pass the FPS game if you take spells or archery).