There are a few groups I enjoy that employ 'harsh' vocals to a limited extent, and sometimes it's actually interesting (Sirenia springs to mind). Usually it's just an annoyance I suffer through because the other parts of the song are awesome though.
It's especially disappointing when you know the fellow/lady in question has a good voice. I don't mind so much if they do
both in a song, provided the actual singing isn't heavily outweighed by the screaming, but I don't think I have any song in my collection that was just screaming/growling/grunting/what have you.
It strikes me as fundamentally broken when I see melo-death fans complaining if their favorite bands start actually singing more often - growling and the like should be something you use for effect, not the primary draw! Blargh.
microwaviblerabbit said:
However, I enjoy it when growling is done very well. Mostly as an intro, or when the song involves more than one 'singer', ie: a conflict between the devil and a human being.
Yeah, that's pretty much the only situation where I actually
want to hear those 'vocal techniques' employed, as it makes an interesting contrast. Then there are vocalists who can modulate their voice to add a devilish 'screamy' quality without actually screaming, like the wonderful Jorn Lande did on
The Devil's Hall of Fame (where I'm pretty sure he's singing
as the devil, so that makes sense).