Why risk bodily harm being manly when you can just shoot from cover like a cowardly archer? But yeah, guns are the deadliest in this day and age.Wardog13 said:FUCK YOUR SWORDS
Personally, I vote for either the Mongol or Celt.
Why risk bodily harm being manly when you can just shoot from cover like a cowardly archer? But yeah, guns are the deadliest in this day and age.Wardog13 said:FUCK YOUR SWORDS
Guns are fucking coward's weapons as far as warriors are concerned, if you ask me. A real warrior has the balls to meet his enemy face to face and look him in the eye before killing him; using either bare hands or a melee weapon. Anything else is for cowards and weaklings.Wardog13 said:
FUCK YOUR SWORDS
Depends on what you mean by "deadliest". if it's:Douk said:This isn't a VS thread, unless you want it to be.
Which class of fighter is your favorite, if you had to become one, which would it be? Of course video games will influence your decisions but it would be nice to get some his'tre in here too.
I would say its a tie between the Knight and the Samurai. Both are so damn cool to see in a fight, but against each other I don't know who would win. IF you have any suggestions for poll options let me know, obviously I'm not an expert.
Modern Soldier means the guys you see today, using guns and explosives.
Yeah man! Where the fuck are the ninjas?drizztmainsword said:Ninja.
There are ten ninja in the room with you RIGHT NOW!
Strange how everyone bitches when someone knifes in MW2 then.canadamus_prime said:Guns are fucking coward's weapons as far as warriors are concerned, if you ask me. A real warrior has the balls to meet his enemy face to face and look him in the eye before killing him; using either bare hands or a melee weapon. Anything else is for cowards and weaklings.Wardog13 said:
FUCK YOUR SWORDS
/my opinion
Because, *ahem* THIS IS NOT SPATA!!!!!!Moravich said:no one has said spartans?!?!
That's a very idealistic view on things. You think modern soldiers are cowards and weaklings? They have to face enemies using weapons that can kill them from a distance in a split second. That takes an enormous amount of balls in my opinion. Much less cowardly than a man who sit on his warhorse with enough armour plating to disable him if he falls off his horse, slashing through footmen who can't even touch him.canadamus_prime said:Guns are fucking coward's weapons as far as warriors are concerned, if you ask me. A real warrior has the balls to meet his enemy face to face and look him in the eye before killing him; using either bare hands or a melee weapon. Anything else is for cowards and weaklings.Wardog13 said:
FUCK YOUR SWORDS
/my opinion