Poll: the end of pokèmon

ParkourMcGhee

New member
Jan 4, 2008
1,219
0
0
I think they should develop a Pokemon MMO with all the different lands and however many pokemon there are now.

Then you should get to pick a starting location and work your way up!

They would make bajillions!
 

Andothul

New member
Feb 11, 2010
294
0
0
I doubt pokemon will end in the near future. Pokemon is part of the childhood of a whole generation and they make more money with each installment. People aren't gonna stop buying them for a long ass time.

Infact Pokemon is the second highest grossing game series of all time
 

PlasticTree

New member
May 17, 2009
523
0
0
No, don't stop, but please change some actual gameplay, instead of the pokémon. 300 was more than enough.
 

DarkHourPrince

New member
May 12, 2010
534
0
0
henritje said:
seeing the new starters and the upcoming pokèmon games makes me think that Pokèmon should just end it stopped being original after Pokèmon 2 (gold/silver) and also the new designs so what do you think
I felt the idea stream running a tad weak after Gold/Silver/Crystal, so I agree it needs to just die instead of beating a horse on a respirator at this point. At least gold/silver/crystal had something of a reason to be made since they made Ho-oh fly through the sky above Ash in the very first episode.

I picked Pokemon up again at Diamond/Pearl and while the adventure point of the game was.. alright.. I spent half of the game going "I don't know what attack this is. What the hell do THAT do? What IS that thing!?"
 

AdamRBi

New member
Feb 7, 2010
528
0
0
odanhammer said:
AdamRBi said:
odanhammer said:
I've loved to see a real pokemon game , in which follows closer to the show rather then to limited gameboy crap.
The original games where limited to 4 moves per pokemon due to limits in the software at the time.
Those limits have since been removed , and your telling me that i can still only get 4 moves.

Why not make it so your moves level up rather then your pokemon, or have the moves level up as well as the pokemon.


Second off , make it so you can catch all the pokemon in the game , two games to get all the pokemon is a scam to get more money and i refuse to follow that, although the online trading did help a lot.

Thirdly, i'd love to have a story but not be forced to follow a path, if i want to go to the "last gym" first i should be able to.

Fourthly, who is buying these games anymore , each game is a copy / paste of the last game with a few minor features added. Gold was the best of all of them , hence the remake which is just another cash grab.
Ok, first of all: No, the games should never follow the cartoon. This has been a major folly of the games in that they've been getting a little too close to the show for comfort. The closer it gets to the show, the more designed for kids the characters get and the more it's dumbed down for a smaller demographic.

Secondly, the amount of damage a move does is tied in with your pokemon's attack/special attack, your opponent's defense/special defense, and the move's power plus any items, natures, or abilities present in batter. It's already deep enough to the point where the moves can get better by simply leveling your pokemon. Also keeping it to four moves balances out the game and adds more strategy to which moves you can use and how you should use those moves together. Adding more moves could, in theory, add to this, but then again it has more of a chance of unbalancing certain pokemon and ruining the strategy aspect.

Third, true: Making it necessary to trade to catch all the pokemon does seem like a ploy to get more money. Unless you have friends who got the other versions or wifi in which case they were buying the game anyway. Though on that subject they do need to stop with the this-version-only Legendaries.

Fourthly: I'm still buying these games because I love the series, there's enough change between each game in the core gameplay mechanics to keep it interesting, and because of that I can have a whole new experience, especially if I play through it to have fun and not just "beat the game." Honestly, Pokemon Platinum, I took that game slow and didn't beat the elite four until after Heart Gold came out. I haven't bought the Remake yet, but I'm still Playing Platinum.

I'm not going to say you need a bit of imagination to enjoy the game, but it really helps in terms of the story and characters. Pokemon games appear cookie cutter/copy pasted because the shell of the game doesn't change. That's because they kept changing how the game works and how it's played, which in a game is the number one priority of developers.

And just to restate: The games should NEVER be like the show. EVER!! If you want a game based off the show, buy Pokemon Yellow Version.


EDIT: This post sounds looks like a rant, I'll sum it up:

1. Pokemon Games should never mimic the Cartoon, the Cartoon should more closely follow the games. (Almost like the Manga does.)

2. The Pokemon gameplay mechanics are so intertwined under the surface that something like multiple moves could throw the balance off.

3. The need to trade pokemon to complete the pokedex can be seen as a way to make more money, but it does have a bit of merit to it involving people to communicate with others to finish their game instead of being antisocial with it.

4. I love the series, they've done such a great job making each generation different enough then the last in terms of gameplay that it makes up for the fact that the general plot is the same.

5. Pokemon Games should NEVER be like the Cartoon! EVER!!
i actually enjoyed gold the most out of all the games , as it had the largest area to explore, most game time.
Yellow was a game in the right direction however, it does lean to a more kid friendly aspect, which of course is what pokemon is. A kids tv show.

I just believe that by following the show a little closer , meaning adding elements of the show into the games a bit more , they would improve the quality of the games.

Just an example , the noises shouldn't be 8-bit anymore. They should use the tv show noises.

Rather then have turn based RPG , switch to a more dynamic game , where a battle takes you into the area and lets you be the pokemon , with the ability to switch between and use potions,etc.
So that you can dive under the water to evade an attack , rather then use calculations to determine if you get hit and how much damage you take.

This would include adding the ability to use more then 4 moves , and would also make battles more intense , much more fun , and would also make them more like the show , where skill is considered more as you might have a weaker pokemon , but you know how to use them better. Or are just much more smarter.

Since currently its like both pokemon stand infront of each other using attacks. Rather then jumping around , hiding behind rocks and trying to evade each other while attacking at the same time.


A game like that would also be great with how much your pokemon like /dislike you , and how tried /rested they are.
Since a weak pokemon doesn't just have to be because of health points and level, it can also include that they are tried and just plain hate you for not giving them a treat once in a while.
I'm not sure how to reply, because I don't know if you're being serious. But just in case, let me say one thing.

I would love a game where you control the pokemon in battle, close to what you described actually. Maybe in a Super Smash Bros style of gameplay. But I would hate to see it in the games, because Turn-Based battles just work so much better strategically. Doing what you described would be like giving players the ability to play a round of chess where all the pieces move at once and could move in any direction. It changes the game dramatically.

I really don't like the show, it's too dumbed down for kids. The games at least has that deep gameplay element that people love so much. If anything the show's like a cancer. An ok cancer that you can maybe watch for a bit and get a nice chuckle out of... but it's still cancer.

I liked the first episode... where it had the Red Opening...
 

end_boss

New member
Jan 4, 2008
768
0
0
I think they should certainly make it less frequent. My buddy turned me on to Pokemon with Pearl, so I jumped in late at Generation IV. I recently picked up Soul Silver and I'm quite bored already with the story, which is exactly the same between both games, and I really just want to be able to get to the point where I can open the game to the National Dex.

And now they say that Black and White aren't far behind.

SLOW THE HELL DOWN! When games come out this quickly, it makes me less inclined to get the next one because I know it'll be obsolete around the corner. They should take their time, let each generation stew a bit, let it run its course rather than sweeping it off the table with a new one.

On the other hand, Nintendo won't listen to that idea because they could probably keep their company afloat based on Pokemon alone.