- Jul 13, 2010
Getting beat up. If South Park has taught me anything, getting beat up by a girl makes you a fag. Also, it's okay to beat up a girl if she started it, or if she's bein' a dick.
But what if she's a zombie?lonercs said:It is not hypothetical. This happens a lot, and not all cases are even reported. I know the were never threatened by an abusive person. If you were, you would agree with me. You think that the only way to be put in a threatening situation is by running your mouth? That's simply not true. A person can become violent from intoxication to irrational behavior. There does not necessarily need to be a reason other then the person likes to hurt others.saintchristopher said:Okay. If you want me, or anyone to take you seriously, proofread what you type. I've never seen anyone articulate a speech impediment into text before now.lonercs said:You are an idiot! So abuse is ok if it's girl on guy. I hope you get the living shit beat out of you by an abusive girl and is put in the hospital. You probably will not be able to defend yourself legality and you won't defend yourself physical. Please if you try, you most likely get sued.saintchristopher said:I don't care if she is kicking your ass 8 ways from Sunday; YOU DON'T HIT GIRLS.
The domestic abuse laws are screwed up in the worst fucked up ways you you only make it worst. The only way to show you the truth is if your victimize or your close friend/family member suffers from it.
I don't know what world you're living in where women are just going around putting men in the hospital, but neither I nor my friends are stupid or emotionally fragile enough to be around women - or ANYBODY, for that matter - who have violent outbursts, let alone cultivate relationships with them.
Cook up all the hypothetical situations you want. If I were physically attacked by a girl, I'd probably have it coming. But never once in my life have I been in a situation where I felt threatened with physical violence. Do you want to know how I managed that? By not pissing people off by running my stupid mouth, a trick you would think more people might have figured out by now,
You say that if you are attacked by a girl, you probably had is coming. What if you didn't, or what if it was a guy? Again, abusive behavior does not necessarily need a reason. Even if there is a reason, it may not be a valid one. An irrational person can be offend or angered by imaginary situations when the person has no evidences such situation even took place.
I can continue arguing my point and you may still not be convinced. So I'll respond to your post we the two above points and stop. However, I want you to know that the only difference between male-on-female abuse and female-on-male is the switched genders. Unfortunately, people tend to ignore female-on-male abuse, or belittle it's seriousness.
exactly the whole concept of "i don't beat girls" is technically sexistAngryMongoose said:Fight back FFS. Being unwilling to fight back "Because they're a girl" chauvinistic. They're human, they have fists, they're attacking you, fight back. The assumption that you can merely restrain them assumes that all males are considerably stronger and are better at combat, which isn't true.
Not just technically sexist; explicitly sexist against both genders.faspxina said:*snip*
exactly the whole concept of "i don't beat girls" is technically sexist
See, intellectually I know that idea is stupid, but there'd still be a part of me saying "What? No! You can't do that you bastard!"Tolerant Fanboy said:How much you believe that girls have some form of gender-specific diplomatic immunity from unarmed combat.
Which raises the quesiton of whether the people here who'd refuse to hit a girl on the grounds that they're weaker would extend the same kindness to males with arms as thick as twigs.Tolerant Fanboy said:But not if she's handing you your own nipples on a silver platter.