katana. my reason? melee weapons aren't re-loadable...although I would prefer to have a spear though, just because they're not as heavy and have longer reach,but whatevs
Kopikatsu said:Guns would be mostly useless, unless you felt like attracting MORE zombies, which is even more pointless, because you probably don't have a metric crapton of ammo, or any way to repair/clean the gun.
Amen. What is the point of killing zombies if they can't hurt you at a long range? It just brings unwanted attention to yourself.Yureina said:Katana. Its what I'd do best with in the long run.
A crossbow? Are you nuts? A crossbow will just pierce through their flesh without any real damage. Haven't you played D&D?Flying-Emu said:You guys are all silly. Melee weapons and crossbows are the only way to survive the zombie apocalypse: Silent, accurate, and deadly.
Having a crowbar would be useful as hell in said apocalypse, but getting swarmed might be an issue considering there's a very low chance you have CQC training or serious skills with a sword, no offense.Mr. Doe said:Melee weapons are superior (firing a gun will just act as a huge lure) crowbars are perferred as they are sturdy and useful for opening doors and caving in skulls.
Even a bow and arrow if you're good enough with it.crudus said:Amen. What is the point of killing zombies if they can't hurt you at a long range? It just brings unwanted attention to yourself.Yureina said:Katana. Its what I'd do best with in the long run.
A crossbow? Are you nuts? A crossbow will just pierce through their flesh without any real damage. Haven't you played D&D?Flying-Emu said:You guys are all silly. Melee weapons and crossbows are the only way to survive the zombie apocalypse: Silent, accurate, and deadly.
That looks like it would bend on impact over a long period of time. It looks more like it's for prying or "Wrenching" than whacking.theSovietConnection said:I personally would go for a crossbow, but since that isn't an option, I'd go for a close-quarter combat weapon. This one to be precise.