NickCaligo42 said:
In my experience, student teams also aren't auteur-driven.
I'm going to have to disagree on that. In my experience, if there's any design space the students can take ownership of at all, they will. Furthermore, in projects where the specification isn't assigned by an outside force, someone on the team, essentially, wrote the specification, and, if the idea is any good, it will almost certainly end up being that person's baby.
This is not actually a bad thing, IMO, as long as the person in question recognizes it and nobody finds it objectionable. Where you have problems is when either people's perceptions, and possibly their egos, don't match up with reality. There's still room for humility and highlighting the parts other people played in this, but, honestly, there will be someone leading the charge.
On the other hand, I may have misunderstood what you mean by "auteur-driven", but this is based on my (admittedly limited and anecdotal) experience from school. If there isn't someone who really, truly believes in a student-defined product beyond its value in getting a grade, it really won't be terribly remarkable.