I know the information in this link is in a fairly pale shade of brown and a rather small typeface but it points out why this issue has been put on the President's desk.Knonsense said:What he says is probably true.
More importantly, however, why is this any of the president's business?
The mental image I am getting from this just about made me laugh myself out of my chair. You sir, have just made my day!Fondant said:Let's get the list out.
*Removes impossibly long, dusty-looking and ancient list*
Now, things bad for the health. Starting at 'A'... Arrmaggedon, Asbestos, Attilla The Hun, Bees, Blades, Blunt Instruments....
*Continues on for the next four years, until*
Ah, Videogames! Here we are: "Videogames are, like Television, Reading, Wargaming, Websurfing and drinking coffee, bad for one's health if one indulges in them in Extremis and neglects the other facets of a healthy life; like Movement."
You and me both. I could go on for HOURS... But I won't. However, I can say this:wpheloung12 said:As a republican, a gamer, and someone who hates people who think gaming is bad for you, I really, really, really want to attack Obama for this. But my amygdala is stopping me.
You sir, are AWESOME. And I am dissapointed in Obama. You would think he would get that logic. Oh well. I guess it isn't surprising since he supports gun bans.Kuliani said:One thing to note from his speech, he recognizes that kids are playing videogames. What did kids do before videogames? Play outside? No, they watched TV. If you simply take away videogames, the children will just watch TV.
The only thing that can get the kids outside is the parents. Madden football is fun, why don't you go and buy your kid a real football and see if they can reenact some of that in-game awesomeness? Hell, make it so that in order to play their games, they have to race you around the outside of your house/block first?