Phenotypically and neurologically they generally still fit
Intersex people? Hardly, unless you
really stretch the definitions of the male and female sex to allow almost any traits of the opposite sex.
Which is where neurology can come into play as a deciding factor.
Neurology is one of the
least understood areas in terms of gender differentiation. There's a huge amount of research, and countless trends and tendencies have been identified.... but if you show a neuroscientist a single brain image, they will not be able to determine with much certainty whether it's male or female. There's enormous overlap, even in those areas which show differentiation.
Also not to be too pedantic but a number of those conditions result in the person being infertile on a genetic level. To give a comparison a person can be born due to possible mutation or exposure to mutagenic agents missing limbs. Does that mean we should consider the standard images of humans to not have all their limbs?
Why the fuck is that relevant? We're not determining the "standard image". We're describing morphologies that exist.
Then people need to find something to actually define them by
...We have. The umbrella term "intersex" includes various sub-types which have been identified and scientifically described. And scientists usually don't ascribe them as entirely male or female.
It actually kind of does as the more in doubt research was about matter type and size comparisons while Dr Verma's research hasn't had much solid rebuttal.
Why would it? You're expecting rebuttal for a fairly uncontroversial study.
The issue isn't any flaw in Verma's research which requires rebuttal. The issue is that you seem to believe the research indicates something that it doesn't, and that Verma never claimed.
No however you wanting warrior mage while saying it's a myth there is any real difference between the two does suggest the desire to make the 2 into a single entity.
Right, so your analogy is just someone claiming that male and female are exactly the same thing, which nobody is doing and nobody has said. We're back to strawmanning.