Claims it's "just the way people talk in this industry".The Great JT said:This just in, Kotick promises to be "more of an asshole" this year.
First, you need to see Yatzhee's review of the game and follow EVERY direction he gives.lwm3398 said:I never actually played Psychonauts (Feel free to verbally, or perhaps physically if you know where I live, crucify me), so I don't actually get that joke. But... Uh...The_root_of_all_evil said:The Milkman wouldn't. The Milkman needs to bring his milk to Blizzard. It's full of what the company wants, what the company needs.
Everyday I forget to buy the game I follow those directions for an hour straight.Moriarty70 said:First, you need to see Yatzhee's review of the game and follow EVERY direction he gives.
Oh man, i was just thinking about it !The_root_of_all_evil said:The Milkman wouldn't. The Milkman needs to bring his milk to Blizzard. It's full of what the company wants, what the company needs.lwm3398 said:Which one of us wouldn't vote for him?
I agree with him as much now as I agreed back then - fully.Tim_of_Legend said:Getting mad at Activision for this kind of thing is like getting mad at an ape for throwing feces. It's just how the beast communicates.
it seems Schafer is thinking in the same line as i do... making games like that is not a good idea for an industry as "Artsy" as this one.HentMas said:mmm... from a purely enterprise point of view, its a ripoff for the consumers
look, pouring all their resources on one place at the same time, that just means one game at a time, and that means the flow of production is going to stabilize to 1 game at a time from that studio, meaning that what they are trying to do is control the flow of games being released at a given time, a game picks up steam and sell as many as it can, and once they are done, start over with a second game.
wich means that prices will go UP, the game will be as main stream as posible (so they can sell the million figures they want) and games will start to work on thrends, trying to "guess" what the audience wants next, wich brings the seccond problem of "no more risks" "no more untested things" "no more weird things that could be wrong" all in the little "SAFE" bubble of acceptable things.
lets see what happens
It's probably because he's smart enough to realise that most of his customers are idiots, and they'll buy anything because of a brand. If people started actually complaining and stopped buying the games, he'd turn it around in a flash, but that's not going to happen unless all the useless customers disappeared in a fiery explosion.Timbydude said:The worst part of it, by far, is that Kotick feels the need to taunt his consumers. He basically reminds everyone that he's not concerned at all with the quality of a game, as long as it sells.
I can totally see Stevan Seagal killing him hilariously now.Onyx Oblivion said:Maybe Kotick could run a brothel?
I'd feel sorry for the hookers, but it'd fit his sleazy personality.
Or he could run a drug ring!