Psychonauts Creator Calls Bobby Kotick Names

Javex

New member
Mar 15, 2010
92
0
0
Imagine if Tim Schafer ran Activision instead of Kotick? Man. Talk about all the new IP's and creativity. *Starts day-dreaming*
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
Hate him or hate him, he made Activision number 1. EA got dethroned because of him. Guess that 7 billion he spent on Blizzard is soon to payoff even more come the 27th. Good money maker. Terrible PR nightmare.

Dear lord can you imagine him in weapons manufacturing? the things he would say! would be sooooooo epic! hehe
 

Timbydude

Crime-Solving Rank 11 Paladin
Jul 15, 2009
958
0
0
Fully agreed with Schafer. I'm all for making money off of a good game (say, Modern Warfare, though this isn't the place to argue its quality), but it becomes a problem when very little of that money is made from actually creating anything. Activision just wheels and deals franchises/studios in a way that maximizes profits, but ultimately helps no one. Plus, when they pull stunts like the Infinity Ward thing, that just further decreases their credibility.

The worst part of it, by far, is that Kotick feels the need to taunt his consumers. He basically reminds everyone that he's not concerned at all with the quality of a game, as long as it sells. It's essentially like the CEO of Microsoft telling everybody that he hates Windows, and he has no reason to try to improve it.
 

Moriarty70

Canucklehead
Dec 24, 2008
498
0
0
lwm3398 said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
The Milkman wouldn't. The Milkman needs to bring his milk to Blizzard. It's full of what the company wants, what the company needs.
I never actually played Psychonauts (Feel free to verbally, or perhaps physically if you know where I live, crucify me), so I don't actually get that joke. But... Uh...
First, you need to see Yatzhee's review of the game and follow EVERY direction he gives.

As to Kotick, someone needs to play devil's advocate. He is not responsible for the creative aspect of the company. It's the developer's job to sell him on how profitable their idea is. If it's a good idea, a revolutionary idea even, but they can't sell it and get approval, that's a failure of the developer and designer. Obviously it's easier with something that can be franchised and churned out year after year, but he's hardly the only CEO doing that. Both EA and Ubisoft are pumping out annual or near annual franchises.

As for him coming across like a prick, it's because he's honest. Anyone who thinks he's the only one looking to make more money off of gamers is lying to themselves. The only difference between Kotick and everyone else is everyone else sends out a PR guy to spin the story. The only other executive I've ever seen be this blunt is Sony's. Remeber how we can't critasize the PSP because we don't critisize The David?

Bottom line is, did you cancel your subscription when Activision bought Blizzard? Do you refuse to buy any game published by Activision? Have you even written to the company to tell him to stop being such a douche?
 

Jaebird

New member
Aug 19, 2008
1,298
0
0
As someone who does, in fact, play games, I ask you this: When did the gaming industry turn into Hollywood? And I'm not talking about the fact that millions of dollars are being put into games. I'm talking about the constant, pointless chatter between people like this. I mean, I feel like that friend of a couple who's being begrudged into delivering messages between parties because they won't do it themselves.

And I wouldn't speak about making something new if I were you, Mr. Piece-Meal Story Exposition, ala Bioshock. Don't get me wrong; I loved Brutal Legend, but it would have been a better story if all those exposition nodes were actually weaved into the main plot.
 

mattaui

New member
Oct 16, 2008
689
0
0
Activision still makes a lot of games I like to play, and thus they're doing a lot right as a company. Kotick just has a terrible public persona, and apparently is in dire need of a better PR team to properly manage his unfortunate outbursts. As it's been said, he's been the CEO there for a very long time, and he seems to have only really come into the spotlight since the Activision-Blizzard merger.
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
Wish I could boycut Activision... But they got soo many good games!
I loved MW2, but they somehow seemed to pervert the game with them damn DLC's and the lack of dedicated servers, which made up a hacker-heaven! Now Black Ops is coming... And then they have Blizzard! Diablo, Warcraft, Starcraft! And now Bungie signed a 10 year contract with them! WHY BUNGIE WHY!?
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
Moriarty70 said:
First, you need to see Yatzhee's review of the game and follow EVERY direction he gives.
Everyday I forget to buy the game I follow those directions for an hour straight.
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
Heard this before. The man already openly admitted his disdain for Activision and its CEO.
Tim_of_Legend said:
Getting mad at Activision for this kind of thing is like getting mad at an ape for throwing feces. It's just how the beast communicates.
I agree with him as much now as I agreed back then - fully.
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
There's little much for me to do other than nod my head sagely at Mr. Schafer's words. At least he actually enjoys the games as much as the gamers do.
 

Blue Musician

New member
Mar 23, 2010
3,344
0
0
Indeed Tim Schafer, very much indeed...

But still we want some games made by you on the PC please, I always wanted to try out Brutal Legend, even with it's criticism with Yahtzee.
 

HentMas

The Loneliest Jedi
Apr 17, 2009
2,650
0
0
I´m going to quote myself just this once
HentMas said:
mmm... from a purely enterprise point of view, its a ripoff for the consumers

look, pouring all their resources on one place at the same time, that just means one game at a time, and that means the flow of production is going to stabilize to 1 game at a time from that studio, meaning that what they are trying to do is control the flow of games being released at a given time, a game picks up steam and sell as many as it can, and once they are done, start over with a second game.

wich means that prices will go UP, the game will be as main stream as posible (so they can sell the million figures they want) and games will start to work on thrends, trying to "guess" what the audience wants next, wich brings the seccond problem of "no more risks" "no more untested things" "no more weird things that could be wrong" all in the little "SAFE" bubble of acceptable things.

lets see what happens
it seems Schafer is thinking in the same line as i do... making games like that is not a good idea for an industry as "Artsy" as this one.
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
Timbydude said:
The worst part of it, by far, is that Kotick feels the need to taunt his consumers. He basically reminds everyone that he's not concerned at all with the quality of a game, as long as it sells.
It's probably because he's smart enough to realise that most of his customers are idiots, and they'll buy anything because of a brand. If people started actually complaining and stopped buying the games, he'd turn it around in a flash, but that's not going to happen unless all the useless customers disappeared in a fiery explosion.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
Maybe Kotick could run a brothel?

I'd feel sorry for the hookers, but it'd fit his sleazy personality.

Or he could run a drug ring!
I can totally see Stevan Seagal killing him hilariously now.

"Drugs are your buisness. Killing is mine. I'd say we both had a pretty good year." BANG