I don't know much about probability and the maths surrounding it...
for no real reason just now I've been thinking about something and I'm a bit confused mabye any maths nerds can help me out
1. ok first "thing" (theory, rule I don't know) is that I think I once heard the more time that passes, the higher the probability of something happening gets. This is kind of part of how life came about....it just took a really really long time for the unlikely "thing" to happen (not sure that was) or to put it another way I think I once saw on a documetry that its not impossible for sand blown by the wing on a beach to arrange itself into a sandcastle by pure chance....its just incredibly unlikely and the time required for that probability to come about is alot (maybe more time than the universe has)
2. this second thing Ive heard I think someone here referred to it as "gamblers fallacy" as in if a gambler is betting on "heads or tales" and it keeps getting heads over and over and over the gamblers Idea is that "its gonna get tails the NEXT one" <-repeat untill they end up boke, I think the fallacy is that the probability of heads or tales is independent
these two Ideas seem to contractict each other
so If I'm still making sense would anyone care to explain/tell me where I got it wrong? ;p
for no real reason just now I've been thinking about something and I'm a bit confused mabye any maths nerds can help me out
1. ok first "thing" (theory, rule I don't know) is that I think I once heard the more time that passes, the higher the probability of something happening gets. This is kind of part of how life came about....it just took a really really long time for the unlikely "thing" to happen (not sure that was) or to put it another way I think I once saw on a documetry that its not impossible for sand blown by the wing on a beach to arrange itself into a sandcastle by pure chance....its just incredibly unlikely and the time required for that probability to come about is alot (maybe more time than the universe has)
2. this second thing Ive heard I think someone here referred to it as "gamblers fallacy" as in if a gambler is betting on "heads or tales" and it keeps getting heads over and over and over the gamblers Idea is that "its gonna get tails the NEXT one" <-repeat untill they end up boke, I think the fallacy is that the probability of heads or tales is independent
these two Ideas seem to contractict each other
so If I'm still making sense would anyone care to explain/tell me where I got it wrong? ;p