Love to hear how a small Cadre of motivated people doesn't win elections against an apathetic majority.
My comment was about Roe, not the that thing. Pretty funny that in actuality women didn't lose any rights, it's doctors that technicality lost a right. That's how bad Roe v Wade was, along with the fact that doctors aren't allowed to just do whatever they and their patients want so the whole logic and ruling was basically a joke in a legal sense. And who was saying Roe could never be overturned? The very people that are pro-abortion were saying such things let alone the people against abortion yet Roe could never be overturned or was too strong or whatever, only ignorant people may have said that.
Yes, exactly, you were bullshitting. You refused to engage with the substance of what I said and instead resorted to your usual rudeness and deflection. This is why you're not taken seriously.
I was asking a legit question based on your following response
Latinx didn't originate from from Hispanics so if you want latinx to replace latino/a, then you're prescribing to another culture what word to use. And even if you're not telling them to use the word, you would be saying others should use the term latinx to refer to latino/a when you never even asked them if that's what they want to be called. Isn't that literally the opposite of what the whole pronoun push is about, calling people want they want to be called vs telling them what they should be called? Thus, why I asked the question to see what your stance is. I'm just highlighting how all this stuff has no common principles and it's basically "let's make it up as we go" bullshit.
Yep. Zero rights lost there. 'Course, I was talking about elections and "settled" law
Who said Roe wouldn't be overturned and the possible overturning of Roe was fear mongering? Because that's my comment that you responded to.
No you weren't. You were asking in bad faith to try and put me on defense. You're mad because it's not working.
I don't understand why you'd be defending using latinx unless that was your stance.
Because you didn't bother to. I didn't even directly defend latinx, which I could take or leave. I merely pointed out that not everyone agrees with you.
Don't you like the choices between a turd burger and a mud hot dog?
That's why you look at what the majority thinks for like literally everything because not everyone agrees with everyone ever. So you just responded merely to disagree with me and that was it...
No, I responded to point out that the rest of the world does not secretly agree with you. You do that a lot.
The logic behind it is reasonably sound. Bigger rallies coincide with voter energy, which translates to mobilization in campaigning and on election day, turnout. Especially so in hyper-polarized landscapes such as that of the contemporary US, where election results depend less on swing voting than getting a party's periphery to the polls (the base is going to turn out regardless).
I mean, you're right about the opportunism, but the opportunism is "let's change our policies for only the primary season to benefit Donald Trump because we think he's the most beatable candidate". Again. It really is amazing how shameless they are, networks and companies that spent a half a decade comparing Trump to Hitler suddenly letting him do whatever he wants and posting headlines of the nice things he said about Biden right on time for the only election they want him to win.
Cowardly, opportunistic bitches.
Which makes them the cowardly bitches they are. Enabling and making excuses for the Trump supporters, neo-nazis, and freaking KKK. For that, they can all go to hell, and have all their groins be used as speed bags by demons. Anyone thinking this is a good idea, or to make things more fair can screw off as well and you're living in a delusional world. I have nothing more to say on the matter.
