Research Firm Predicts Xbox 360 Will Outpace Wii, PS3

AzrealMaximillion

New member
Jan 20, 2010
3,216
0
0
CrossLOPER said:
Just chill out. Andy tried to have a bit of fun with his article and you guys went nuts. Besides, you are all scum in the eyes of The PC Master Race. :)

Sleekit said:
when you write a "news" report its supposed to be "up front" not the start of some magical mystery tour of link click which finally reveals what was said is actually only true in one limited circumstance (ie in one country).
The links were in the article.
2 issues though.

1.The links states that the predictions are for US sales. The article does not. Along with the original title basically made this article akin to trolling for page hits.

2.Have you seen the way that Andy Chalk is handling this? Look up his Twitter and see what he's saying.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
Yep, gotta keep buyin' those 360's because all the originals RED RINGED. Be sure to subtract those out next time MS.

(Please ignore the avatar, it makes me look like a dick in this particular post.)
 

D Moness

Left the building
Sep 16, 2010
1,146
0
0
EHKOS said:
(Please ignore the avatar, it makes me look like a dick in this particular post.)
made me lol, maybe i should change my custom title when posting here.

OT I think it is sad to see people trying to fan the flames of console wars.
 

tangoprime

Renegade Interrupt
May 5, 2011
716
0
0
This article is a joke. The title was the reason people don't take you seriously. This is also right on the heels of the PS3 pulling ahead in units moved. Nothing to see here.
 

VeneratedWulfen93

New member
Oct 3, 2011
7,060
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
You should mention that this is specific to US sales Mr Malygris!

They forget to mention that Nintendo already 'won' this generation by not digging itself a giant financial hole in the process. Microsoft would be completely commited to the next generation of hardware, were they not trying to rebuild on five years of red bank statements, which more or less renders the second half of the 360's life moot as far as profit goes.

In case anyone forgot, in June 2007 Microsoft added $1.05bilion in costs to it's own forecasts, specifically to deal with RRoD related costs and replacement.
Its cute when people still complain about RRoD. I havn't experienced any since the Jasper chip. Its a non-issue now. In fact I don't know one person who I know who plays Xbox who has had RRoD in years.
 

Carrots_macduff

New member
Jul 13, 2011
232
0
0
hey andy, if this article was supposed to be "playful", you didnt do a very good job of presenting it that way. a bit of advice, as a journalist, sarcasm is not your friend. leave it alone.

and i did read your correspondence with grey on twitter regarding this article, and i have to say such rampant smugness is very unbecoming, particularly when us forum scrubs are right.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
VeneratedWulfen93 said:
Its cute when people still complain about RRoD. I havn't experienced any since the Jasper chip. Its a non-issue now. In fact I don't know one person who I know who plays Xbox who has had RRoD in years.
It may be cute to you, but it still happened and it cost north of a billion bucks by 2007, you can't talk about the 360 (or it's place in the console wars) and not bring up the big glaring red elephant in the room. They didn't get the overheating issue fixed properly until Trinity and the 360S came along either.
 

Carrots_macduff

New member
Jul 13, 2011
232
0
0
Grey Carter said:

1594-2013
Murdered by videogame newsie, Andy Chalk.

As a PlayStation faithful, I am appalled.
im all for fun and games and jokes, but if you guys want to be funny, at least dont try to use deadpan sarcasm, (grey maybe you could teach andy how to do sarcasm, you're much better at it) or maybe save it for the comments section, and for the love of god don't insult your audience because they misinterpreted your opinion.
 

Carrots_macduff

New member
Jul 13, 2011
232
0
0
the lack of humility on your part andy is quite dissapointing, why take to twitter to insult your readers, instead of responding here where they can defend themselves?
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
Tanis said:
When your forced, erm, retarded enough to buy 2 or more consoles because the hardware is SHIT...
Yeah, I can see how sales would so well.

I'm not saying the 360 didn't do well, hardware wise, but I AM saying that M$ made a TON of money from people buying 2nd or 3rd or 4th or...consoles because their originals crapped out on them.
aww .... I was gonna say that ....

but yeah, not hard to boost sales when the system is build to fail, what was it? like 1/3 of the time or something?
 

Flaery

Ghetto Trash
Dec 23, 2012
116
0
0
I've decided that I do not care who wins the console wars... I just want everyone to make up their mind on who's actually winning it.
 

floppylobster

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,528
0
0
Can we all just agree never to use the phrase "gathering dust" anymore? It's so overused. For a bunch of creative individuals I can't believe the amount of times I've heard it used on these forums with no variation. There are other ways to say 'I don't use it so much any more'. Not to mention that all the items in your house are 'gathering dust'. Let's try to find a new and original way to say things before we end up like all the 'fiscal cliff' journalists.
 

medv4380

The Crazy One
Feb 26, 2010
672
4
23
Claiming that the 360 has won when it can't even be considered as competing in Japan, and has been losing in Europe to the PS3 for a while.

It is only winning in the US. You can't claim victory, and only be winning 1 of the 3 major markets. That's really more of a pyrrhic victory to me.

The cost of the RROD was huge. The cost of extending the Warranty was huge. Victory in this sense is in the Eye of the Beholder.

The Wii, on the other hand, Made money for Nintendo. They didn't take a bath like Sony and MS did.

If MS or Sony plays this game and "Wins" like this again there won't be a Sony or a MS for much longer.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
I don't understand, what difference does it make if the 360 surpasses the Wii in the next few years? The Wii's successor is already out, So the Wii has essentially bowed out of the race already and passed the torch on to the next generation. Sure you can still buy Wii's but it's not exactly getting Nintendo's full support.

If the 360 surpasses the Wii now it'll only because Nintendo stopped supporting it's console earlier to make room for the next and Microsoft is being slow about it.

I assume this is also not factoring in how many additional 360's were bought because the original or previous one had a brain aneurism and died which Wii's tend to do less often.
 

Ieyke

New member
Jul 24, 2008
1,402
0
0
The title was "xbox wins console wars"?
How do you win from last place?

Assuming they're just taking the study at face value and I'm criticizing the study for being idiotic, how in the hell do they figure the 360 can possibly come out on top?

The Wii has a seriously unbeatable lead.
The PS3 has now finally made up the year-late start and sold more units than the 360, because the PS3 has a higher rate of sales.

But, even with the Wii sales dropping off to almost nothing, and the PS3 having the highest rate of sales....the PS3 will never catch the Wii.
You know why? The PS3, 360 and Wii are all doomed to fall into obscurity waaaaay faster than the PS2 did.
The PS2's longevity isn't going to be standard procedure.

The PS2 was the bridging agent between the era of primitive 3D and HD 3D graphics. It was the first of the multimedia consoles. It was a DVD player. It was backwards compatible with the PS1 and the PS3 was just backwards compatible enough with it to remind people, when it wasn't, that they needed a PS2.
It had an unnaturally vast scope, it was super reliable, and it was super user friendly and has one of the best game libraries ever.

The PS3 won the format war with BluRay, it was temporarily backwards compatible with the PS2, it's the more reliable of the two HD consoles, and it has the better game library.
The 360 launched first, is cheaper and has the better online/multiplayer features.

The PS3's strengths apply to its domination NOW, but physical media as a whole is rapidly becoming an irrelevant point, so the fact that it plays BluRays and PS1/PS2 games is going to be utterly nullified by the fact that the PS4 will be able to easily play all the same media in the form of digital content. Unlike the PS3 reminding people they need a PS2 for backwards compatibility, the PS4 will just have the same games available digitally. No one will be going "I need a PS2 to play ____".

Not many people really cared about backwards compatibility on the 360. XBOX games weren't really things you missed once you had their 360 sequels, but you have the option *shrug*. That's why the XBOX didn't have a chance of competing with the PS2. No one had any reason to own one if they had a 360.
And the 360 will suffer the same fate. The 720 will simply make XBOX and 360 games available digitally and no one will have any reason to get a 360 that doesn't already have one.

Digital content is going to nuke the sales rates of the PS3 and 360 loooooong before either one has a chance of catching the Wii.
And, as is, the PS3 is outselling the 360 AND the 720 will probably be coming out first. That means the 720 is going to cut short the sales rate of the 360 BEFORE the PS3's sales rate gets cut.

There's just no logical way the 360 is going to beat the PS3...much less the Wii.

Hilariously, and ironically, the Wii's sales rates are probably going to be the LEAST effected by the release of its successor. A massive portion of consumers aren't even aware that the Wii U is a new console. They don't realize that if they buy a Wii it's an old system...
Nintendo, in that sense, is a genius if they're trying to keep selling Wii's, but real dumb if they're trying to sell Wii U's, because all those people aren't excited for something new.
 

ScrabbitRabbit

Elite Member
Mar 27, 2012
1,545
0
41
Gender
Female
TheRussian said:
Hmm, who is sill letting Andy Chalk write articles?

That wasn't rhetorical by the way.

I began to notice some of his more, er, intriguing articles that got my proverbial knickers in a twist, so I just assumed that my opinions were in the minority. This man is the lowest form of game journalism on the Escapist.

This is not me defending the 360, hell, I don't even own one of the bloody things. According to his Twittter, he claims to not own a 360, but his account has XboX Live linked to it, with several recent games.

This is more about fair journalism on the Escapist that really needs some buggering quality control!
/rant
I don't own a 360, but I still have a Live account that would show you "recently played games" because a lot of PC games require it under the guise of "Games For Windows Live."
 

nodlimax

New member
Feb 8, 2012
191
0
0
Hmm, not sure where they've taken the numbers, but a few weeks ago I read something very different. In regards of units sold (world wide as it seemed) Sony has taken the lead with its PS3 followed by the XBox360. And the numbers of sold units was something between 70 and 80 million.

And btw. the way the escapist presented this news was highly unprofessional imho. You practically begging for a flame war in the comments.
 

Arkley

New member
Mar 12, 2009
522
0
0
I'm pretty sure the original title/article was written with tongue-in-cheek, playful vibe, guys. You're overreacting to an extraordinary degree.

As for Chalk's twitter post; what of it? This thread is positively full of obnoxiously stupid crap.