I suppose we should thank him for putting the lie to the "good guy with a gun" argument. He proved that the "good guy with a gun" will run away and let children die.
That's a rather unfortunate choice of words
I suppose we should thank him for putting the lie to the "good guy with a gun" argument. He proved that the "good guy with a gun" will run away and let children die.
That's a rather unfortunate choice of words
Yeah, most people don't want him back.That's a rather unfortunate choice of words
You didn't meet all my requirements. I said media response directly to a mass shooting and how to fix the issue. None of your links fit that entire description. In fact, one of them literally had nothing to do with how to stop gun violence at all.?
You said the media doesn't address other factors in gun violence. Showing you numerous examples of the media doing exactly that is a direct and clear way to disprove it.
...so you're discounting them because they... aren't in response to a specific shooting, but rather in response to the entire phenomenon? How arbitrary and obtuse can you get?You didn't meet all my requirements. I said media response directly to a mass shooting and how to fix the issue.
What point? How does admin shilling for billionaires lead to this?To prove my point again.
![]()
Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Members of the Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty | The White House
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 121 and 12304 of title 10, United States Code, I hereby determine that it is necessary to augment the active Armed Forces of the United States for the effective conduct...www.whitehouse.gov
That's what happens if your admin shills too much for the billionaires. Democrat or republican.
No one wants to serve in a military whose primary interest is not the national interest but to serve the wishes of corporations that rarely ever pass down the dividends to regular citizens unless it's basically you can buy consumption at "lower prices vs many countries like bananas or fossil fuels". If the US overthrows a banana republic the only benefit you get is cheaper bananas the company paying US citizens back a percent of their profits from using taxpayer dollars to overthrow said banana republic.What point? How does admin shilling for billionaires lead to this?
Yeah, I said those requirements precisely because what the media says directly after a mass shooting dictates the national conversation. My point is the national conversation gets funneled to the same talking points over and over again instead of talking about the main things that actually matter because the powers at be don't wanna address those things....so you're discounting them because they... aren't in response to a specific shooting, but rather in response to the entire phenomenon? How arbitrary and obtuse can you get?