Science!: Red Mohawked Dinos, Photons and Anti-Hunger Pills

Lauren Admire

Rawrchiteuthis
Aug 8, 2008
685
0
0
Science!: Red Mohawked Dinos, Photons and Anti-Hunger Pills

Inside: We can't travel faster than the speed of light, but we can at least pretend.

Read Full Article
 

chrisstevens

New member
Feb 1, 2010
2
0
0
There are quite a few things in the universe faster than light.
One is the early expansion called Inflation after the Big Bang.
Another is the rate at which matter falls into a Black Hole, hence light cannot escape a Black Hole because it is travelling too slowly.
There are also faster than light events at the quantum level, some of which appear to happen at infinite speed, ie simultaneously.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
Lauren Admire said:
(amusing images of cantaloupe-shaped mice rolling around their cage like soccer balls fill my head)
Great, now you've got me thinking of it too. Thanks Lauren.

Nah, just kidding. The mice in my head are shaped like giant pears.
 

More Fun To Compute

New member
Nov 18, 2008
4,061
0
0
Quantum physics is really confusing. Look into it and quantum physicists seem to even question if even light really moves at the speed of light or if it just seems to do that because it knows we are watching it. I don't know, I don't understand, don't blame me.

All I really want to know is if we can have internet connections without any lag.
 

Xaryn Mar

New member
Sep 17, 2008
697
0
0
chrisstevens said:
There are quite a few things in the universe faster than light.
One is the early expansion called Inflation after the Big Bang.
Another is the rate at which matter falls into a Black Hole, hence light cannot escape a Black Hole because it is travelling too slowly.
There are also faster than light events at the quantum level, some of which appear to happen at infinite speed, ie simultaneously.
The reason that light can't escape from a black hole is not that it falls faster but that the escape velocity (ie. the velocity needed to escape from the BH) is larger than the speed of light.

If I remember correctly the Quantum effects you are talking about is entanglement, which is that information travels faster. no ohysical object travels faster than the speed of light but information can.

I can't remember the explanation for the inflation (it has been years since I learned about and used it).
 

Lauren Admire

Rawrchiteuthis
Aug 8, 2008
685
0
0
chrisstevens said:
There are quite a few things in the universe faster than light.
One is the early expansion called Inflation after the Big Bang.
Another is the rate at which matter falls into a Black Hole, hence light cannot escape a Black Hole because it is travelling too slowly.
There are also faster than light events at the quantum level, some of which appear to happen at infinite speed, ie simultaneously.
Incorrect:
1) Inflation - "In an early time after the Big Bang, there is evidence that the universe expanded at speeds greater than light. But special relativity was not violated, because this was an expansion of SPACE and no matter or information was carried between two points at faster than light speed. General relativity allows inflation to be incorporated into Big Bang cosmology."[footnote]NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center[/footnote]

2) Black Hole - the forces may equal, but not exceed, the speed of light: "To be 'sucked' into a black hole, one has to cross inside the Schwarzschild radius. At this radius, the escape speed is equal to the speed of light, and once light passes through, even it cannot escape."[footnote] NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center[/footnote]

3) Quantum Physics
  a) Tunneling - "The photons don't violate relativity: it's just a question of interpretation. Steinberg explains Nimtz and Stahlhofen's observations by way of analogy with a 20-car bullet train departing Chicago for New York. The stopwatch starts when the centre of the train leaves the station, but the train leaves cars behind at each stop. So when the train arrives in New York, now comprising only two cars, its centre has moved ahead, although the train itself hasn't exceeded its reported speed."[footnote] New Scientist - 18 August 2007[/footnote]

"... the tunneling time is given by a credible expression, which approaches a constant for thick barriers, implying an issue concerning superluminal propagation. However, I have argued that physical causality is not violated." [footnote]P.C.W. Davies. Quantum Tunneling Time[/footnote]

  b) Quantum Entanglement - "... quantum entanglement still does not imply faster than light communication. You cannot affect which state the particle goes into, even though it doesn't 'decide' on its state until you observe it."[footnote]Astronomy Department, Cornell University[/footnote]
 

SharedProphet

New member
Oct 9, 2008
181
0
0
paulgruberman said:
chrisstevens said:
There are quite a few things in the universe faster than light.
One is the early expansion called Inflation after the Big Bang.
Another is the rate at which matter falls into a Black Hole, hence light cannot escape a Black Hole because it is travelling too slowly.
There are also faster than light events at the quantum level, some of which appear to happen at infinite speed, ie simultaneously.
Incorrect:
1) Inflation - "In an early time after the Big Bang, there is evidence that the universe expanded at speeds greater than light. But special relativity was not violated, because this was an expansion of SPACE and no matter or information was carried between two points at faster than light speed. General relativity allows inflation to be incorporated into Big Bang cosmology."[footnote]NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center[/footnote]
chrisstevens didn't say it violated general relativity, just that it was faster than light, which is confirmed by your quote.
paulgruberman said:
2) Black Hole - the forces may equal, but not exceed, the speed of light: "To be 'sucked' into a black hole, one has to cross inside the Schwarzschild radius. At this radius, the escape speed is equal to the speed of light, and once light passes through, even it cannot escape."[footnote] NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center[/footnote]
And at less than that radius, the escape speed would be greater than the speed of light. Also, forces and speed are not the same thing.

Your third footnote link is broken (need to change "hre" to "href").
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,902
9,589
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
I have never, ever been able to wrap my head around that whole "light seems to go faster than light through certain materials" thing. To me, it's like if I jumped off a building and you took the stairs, and yet you got to the bottom before me. I'd be like, "Dude, how the hell did you-" *CRUNCH*.

Also, huzzah Labrynth! You get a mention!
 

The Random One

New member
May 29, 2008
3,310
0
0
We have footnotes? Real, honest to God footnotes? Holy crap!

Um, great article, Admire. I kind of understand this whole quantum physics thing, but some of it is mind breaking. Once you start getting into Einstein's thought experiments you will never be able to put a ladder into a garage the same way.

Wasn't quantum entanglement related to this thingy they did to some subatomic particle or other that caused the state of two of them to remain the same no matter how far apart they were (at least in theory)? That means if you put them inside a computer, and sent one half to a friend on one side of the galaxy and one to the other on the other side, one could operate the computer and the other would also see their operation, which I guess they would use to IM. Or am I confusing it with something else?
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
Hmm...Science keeps doing all these cool things, and these articles help me keep up with it without all the fancy lingo of science websites. Thanks Lauren!
 

Outlaw Torn

New member
Dec 24, 2008
715
0
0
I imagine those scientists just decided to make fat mice then when they realised they'd used up all of their funding quickly set to work coming up with a plausible explanation. They're starting to live up to the Aperture Science motto.
 

Outlaw Torn

New member
Dec 24, 2008
715
0
0
The Random One said:
We have footnotes? Real, honest to God footnotes? Holy crap!

Um, great article, Admire. I kind of understand this whole quantum physics thing, but some of it is mind breaking. Once you start getting into Einstein's thought experiments you will never be able to put a ladder into a garage the same way.

Wasn't quantum entanglement related to this thingy they did to some subatomic particle or other that caused the state of two of them to remain the same no matter how far apart they were (at least in theory)? That means if you put them inside a computer, and sent one half to a friend on one side of the galaxy and one to the other on the other side, one could operate the computer and the other would also see their operation, which I guess they would use to IM. Or am I confusing it with something else?
I think that is string theory, that electrons are just the perceivable ends of a true elementary particle that is basically a string with two dots on the ends.
 

Scrythe

Premium Gasoline
Jun 23, 2009
2,367
0
0
Lauren Admire said:
These elaborately-colored feathers were likely used in courtship displays, similar to how colorful modern day birds use their feathers
For some odd reason, I read this as a completely different type of "bird".
 

Jared

The British Paladin
Jul 14, 2009
5,630
0
0
Outlaw Torn said:
I imagine those scientists just decided to make fat mice then when they realised they'd used up all of their funding quickly set to work coming up with a plausible explanation. They're starting to live up to the Aperture Science motto.
Soon we will have cake and computers with a sardonic sense of humour!
 

LewsTherin

New member
Jun 22, 2008
2,443
0
0
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't light made of photons? So, wouldn't they be expected to move at the speed of light?

I think I may have missed something in there somewhere :/


If you think of it in a roundabouts sort of fashion, would the universe have to move faster thatn the speed of light so light has somewhere to move in? Unless the universe only counts for the real matter in an infinite vaccum, or maybe light just stands still, and !!! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY-03vYYAjA]
 

copycatalyst

New member
Nov 10, 2009
216
0
0
I wonder if, a few generations from now, people will look at our current dinosaur books and common images as horribly quaint; if the birdlike traits will completely alter what people believe dinosaurs looked like.
 

Necrofudge

New member
May 17, 2009
1,242
0
0
The interesting thing about Leptin is that high fructose corn syrup can stop it from functioning. Or at least thats what I've read. (it might inhibit some other whatsit in the brain hoozit. Who knows?)
 

Lauren Admire

Rawrchiteuthis
Aug 8, 2008
685
0
0
SharedProphet said:
chrisstevens didn't say it violated general relativity, just that it was faster than light, which is confirmed by your quote.
The question then becomes whether inflation during the Big Bang affected light as well.

SharedProphet said:
And at less than that radius, the escape speed would be greater than the speed of light. Also, forces and speed are not the same thing.
Escape speed exceeding the speed of light is only an issue if something escapes. As nothing that we are aware of has crossed the Schwarzschild radius outbound, the point stands.

Link fixed, thanks!