Science!: Vomit Guns, Nose Spray and Plastic

Lauren Admire

Rawrchiteuthis
Aug 8, 2008
685
0
0
Science!: Vomit Guns, Nose Spray and Plastic

Does plastic make you fat? Can nose sprays really improve your memory? Read on to find out.

Read Full Article
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
I often wonder if i'm a little gay or something. I really don't find Megan Fox attractive.

As for the rest of your article. A pleasure as always.

PS. Creepiest picture for an ad I can think of...



Holy crap how does that stuff sell!
 

grey_painter

New member
Feb 10, 2009
19
0
0
Sexual reproduction was always described as a parasitic act by the male half of the species to me. The female produces all the nutrients in the egg and gestation period yet has to share half the genetic information with us males that produce nothing of any real value. Makes me feel really valuable.
 

Andy_Panthro

Man of Science
May 3, 2009
514
0
0
Re: the military burn laser thing... I was under the impression they were developing it using microwave radiation... so the mild and uncomfortable burning sensation which would disrupt a mob may have unforseen consequences with certain types of metal or electrical objects. Which is why it's not getting through a testing phase.

Seeing how there is possibility for widespread misuse of tasers, rubber bullets and the like, I would fear the day the military gets its hands on more exotic non-lethal weaponry.
 

Kerr0r

New member
Aug 6, 2008
4
0
0
To enhance their genetic fitness, bdelloid rotifers engage in "horizontal gene transfer." They recruit foreign genes from bacteria, fungi and even some plants and integrate them into their own genetic code.
Sound more like zerg to me...
 

Lauren Admire

Rawrchiteuthis
Aug 8, 2008
685
0
0
grey_painter said:
Sexual reproduction was always described as a parasitic act by the male half of the species to me. The female produces all the nutrients in the egg and gestation period yet has to share half the genetic information with us males that produce nothing of any real value. Makes me feel really valuable.
It would be parasitic, except that both individuals benefit from the relationship, so it would probably be a mutualistic relationship if anything
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
"Scientists believe that the rotifers habitually break down their own genome and then rebuild it using genes from surrounding rotifers and even other species. Another way they receive new genetic information is from the food they eat,"

So they're basically Tiny Tyranids?
 

Ridonculous_Ninja

New member
Apr 15, 2009
905
0
0
Kerr0r said:
To enhance their genetic fitness, bdelloid rotifers engage in "horizontal gene transfer." They recruit foreign genes from bacteria, fungi and even some plants and integrate them into their own genetic code.
Sound more like zerg to me...
That is exactly what I thought when I read that, they incorporate their food into their genome. It does sound very much like the Zerg assimilation.

If they ever became vertebrate, we will need to develop firebats.

Or get that guy with the wrist mounted flamethrowers...
 

randommaster

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,802
0
0
grey_painter said:
Sexual reproduction was always described as a parasitic act by the male half of the species to me. The female produces all the nutrients in the egg and gestation period yet has to share half the genetic information with us males that produce nothing of any real value. Makes me feel really valuable.
Well, it would be parasitic if males did nothing except have sex, but it's usually the males who compete directly, and in the cases where both male and female raise the young, protect their offspring. Humans, however, don't do a lot of desperate survival, so everthings getting wonky.

And before everybody yells at me with a bunch of exceptions, it's just a general rule, not an absolute.
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
grey_painter said:
Sexual reproduction was always described as a parasitic act by the male half of the species to me. The female produces all the nutrients in the egg and gestation period yet has to share half the genetic information with us males that produce nothing of any real value. Makes me feel really valuable.
That's kind of a half-truth. If it were purely parasitic, it wouldn't survive that easily. There are benefits to our survival that come from the mixing of genes.

There's often questions about some aspects of it though. In principle, it seems like it would make more sense for everyone to be hermaphrodites. (since this would allow anyone to reproduce with anyone else, which makes finding a partner much easier. In principle it even allows mating with yourself, as a last resort.)
But the usual explanation is that the two specialised groups tend to do better at their particular task than one that is capable of both.

The other common issue is why there is essentially a 50/50 split of male/female. This is especially obvious when you look at lions and similar 'harem' groups.
Think about it... A male's contribution to procreation lasts about 5 minutes to a few hours maybe (if you're lucky). A female's lasts at least 9 months (in humans).
As a consequence, in the time it takes for a female to produce 1 child, a male can easily produce dozens, if not thousands.
Therefore, why aren't we in a situation where there is, say, 1 man to 100 women? Which would be perfectly practical from a reproductive perspective?

The answer seems to be genetics, because any gene that causes more males to be produced would be at an advantage when females outnumber males. This would in turn cause a gradual increase in the number of males around, until eventually you reach the point where it's no longer an advantage, which is the point where there's just as many males as females.
Look at lions. One male to 10 females is pretty common. And yet, the other 9 males still exist, even though they don't really serve any purpose in a setup like that.

OK... Enough scientific lecturing. XD.
 

R4di4ti0n.

New member
Sep 11, 2009
63
0
0
I am pretty sure that vomit gun doesnt really work, like, as in, the lady did a video and said it doesnt work.

I wish though.
 

paragon1

New member
Dec 8, 2008
1,121
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
"Scientists believe that the rotifers habitually break down their own genome and then rebuild it using genes from surrounding rotifers and even other species. Another way they receive new genetic information is from the food they eat,"

So they're basically Tiny Tyranids?
Pretty much my though exactly. We should probably exterminate them while we still can.
 

MajoraPersona

New member
Aug 4, 2009
529
0
0
CrystalShadow said:
Think about it... A male's contribution to procreation lasts about 5 minutes to a few hours maybe (if you're lucky).
If it takes a few hours for the male's "role" to occur, and his "zerg" tactics really took that long, then should he really get that "role"?
 

lord pickle

New member
Apr 9, 2009
22
0
0
What doesn't make you fat, nowadays? I was totally on board whenever people were blaming fast food, lack of exercise and high glucose corn syrup for the extra inches, but lately, it's just gotten ridiculous. I've heard claims that everything from health insurance to credit cards can play a role in causing people to gain weight.

Why doesn't this make sense? Obviously having health insurance doesn't instantaneously cause you to pack on 20 pounds but I could see many people that have health insurance in the U.S. letting them selves go and saying "screw it I'm covered."

The credit card thing makes even more sense. With my debit card I am constantly tempted to buy things that I might otherwise say "screw it" during the time that it would take to go to the bank and take out cash.
 

KazNecro

New member
Jun 1, 2009
194
0
0
I saw a '60 minutes' feature last year about the military developing a heat ray as a non-lethal form of riot control. But the gun featured was huge and mounted on a jeep. If they've gotten as small as a hand-held gun over the course of a year, I'm mighty impressed.

In case anyone's interested here's the link to the article.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/29/60minutes/main3891865.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody

Edit:
Fun fact: Bdelloid rotifers aren't the only organisms that can desiccate when water is scarce. Tardigrades (or Water Bears) can survive up to 10 years while desiccated.