*Agreeing statements, wild speculations and half-baked theories*
Yes, I'm just guessing here. It's all I can do at the moment. If there's something I've learned facing one or two conflicts of my own, is that there are always two sides to a story. Now I could track these people down to get the other side of it, which would contain what the girl has been doing to get him to play less WoW before deleting all his characters and the guy's response to her, but frankly I don't care that much about it.
What I'm more interested in at the moment, is how you are only capable of siding with the guy, while there's clearly a situation the size of an Amazon rain forest going on here and we're only allowed to see two to four trees of it.
Yes, the guy is a victim, I fully acknowledge that as you already know. But is it so unrealistic to assume that the girlfriend has suffered somewhat equally before her retaliation was put on tape?
You say the only clear victim is the guy, and that regarding the girl as a victim is twisted logic. That's like seeing a girl kicking a guy in the nuts (which I find quite cruel), then immediately stating she was the only one doing the wrong thing. We don't know what was going on before she did that. Maybe he was trying to rape her, or he threatened her life in some way (which are situations I find it warranted that girls kick a guy in the nuts, I mean come on).
Eventhough I wouldn't condone the deletion of lvl 80 characters in any case like I would a girl striking a guy's wedding bells under certain circumstances, I might be able to understand why this girl thought she had the right to do it. If it turned out her logic was as flawed as her reaction I would call crazy and join your side.
Maybe it happened like you see it: He put up a couple of restrictions, she didn't like them so she overreacted to the power infinity. If that's the case, fine. She's the only one who's a crazy *****, and good riddance to her. May he hack all her social networking sites and destroy all the relationships she's been carefully maintaining over the years. It would only be fair, if a little immature.
As you said, it's all just speculation and half-baked theories.