[spoiler/]
Casual Shinji said:
WoW addiction IS a problem.
No it's not. Having an addictive personality is a problem. WoW doesn't factor into that at all.
Addiction is a problem is what you should say.
Insanum said:
WoW addiction is a serious problem for some people.
See above.
Article said:
such as wizards, dwarves, and warriors,
1) Mages, not Wizards.
2) 'Dwarf' isn't a class.
If you're going to write an article, do your research first. Thanks.
all battling it out in an epic landscape to hunt for gold.
Factually incorrect. See above. As a Warcraft player myself I am of course biased, but my god people if you don't even do basic research on the game don't write an article about it. It just makes you look stupid.
I fully support parents in regulating their children's time on the Internet
Well Blizzard are helping you out because you can put Parental Controls on a WoW account to only let it be played for a certain amount of time/during a certain time period.
I also encourage schools to become more aggressive in educating children about time management and why monitoring time spent on video games is healthy.
Can we include 'in front of the TV'? Because that seems to be just as bad. I've heard of people who go home and spend 6 hours sat in front of the TV before eating dinner, watch some more TV and then go to bed.
Explain how that's an
any better than a video game, please.
If you're 'addicted' to WoW, you have an addictive personality. That's an underlying problem not related to World of Warcraft at all.
Please stop trying to ruin my game experience just because you're incapable of growing a pair of testicles and facing reality with two feet on the ground rather than two eyes glued to your screen.
Pro tip:
You'd be addicted to something else if it wasn't WoW. Just be glad it's not hard drugs or alcohol.
I'd also like to point out that a) Blizzard have made WoW so casual friendly over the years it's frankly amusing from where I'm sat. It's actually difficult to be addicted to WoW. It really is. There's not enough to do anymore and b) With eleven million active accounts worldwide, it's not surprising they get more reports like this. Larger numbers=more reports.
Duh?
My RL job is, in part, to look out for sexual predators in an on-line environment. I'm now wondering how one would tell the difference between a psychiatrist probing for details of a child's life and a run of the mill paedophile?
A psychiatrist won't ask what the child is wearing.
am I the only one who found this article perfectly sensible, tame, and unoffensive?
There's nothing sensible about encouraging poor/sensationalist journalism.[/spoiler]