I legitimately will never understand the "Steam doesn't curate what games are on the platform".
That always created a resounding "...So?" in my heart. If Steam doesn't control what games that are on the platform, you know who in my household controls what games I look through? Myself. And as far as I know, Steam doesn't require you to buy any percentage of these games per month to keep your account.
This is the argument for censorship of Media which I thought everyone was against. Faceless company needs to sanitize and sterilize what comes before me so I don't have to be offended.
There are literally thousands of games on steam that I'll never know a thing about because I don't go searching for them. If there's a game I heard about that I am interested in, I go and search for it on Steam. If it's there. I download it. Other than that, I don't have a clue what's on Steam because it doesn't interest me. I don't search for content that I Might Like. I search for content I've already done research on and it interests me. And the user reviews also help me sway my opinion more.
I was absolutely excited for Epic. It didn't reach the level of polish I'd want to buy in. In fact, other than random free games, I consider the Epic Game Store as an inferior service to Epic. And instead of getting better or whatever, the CEO went on a quasi tweet war, basically ignoring complaints and liking developers who helped sell the hype of the platform. Which is odd, because he's continually on record stating his motivation of challenging Steam is to force them to do better... while not doing better themselves. I'm a hundred percent with the sentiments that Steam needs to give developers more money. But Epic needs to offer customers a better deal, not just complain about how bad Steam is.
Everyone else do what you want. That's the human way, after all.