well yes in a way. But think of all the productivity created by the increase in educationRagdrazi said:As an economist who is opposed to piracy, surely you must also be decrying the terrible effect our public library systems can have on book sales. Surely.Hithlain said:I'm an economist, so I know firsthand that the information that companies use to determine what games to make next is the PROFIT. Your contribution may be small but you are voting for more of the same with your money. Think of all the lost sales over the years....
Libraries exist for the purpose of allowing people to read books for free, so your analogy confuses me. Why don't more people read? I don't know that they don't, but people would increasingly rather than one-click their way through Amazon than visit the local library -- much the same way they'd rather use Netflix or a streaming video service than visit their local video store. It's simply a matter of convenience. And also, people viewing porn in the library is totally ew. (Fun fact - I worked in a library when I was in high school.)Ragdrazi said:Who? The pirates, who I'd remind you are under the law not capable of being viewed as stealing anything. Or EA, who I'd remind you are using piracy and a leak that they may have in their own company as an excuse to steal from the second hand game market?
You don't have to be evil of cheap to want to read a book for free. But doing something about it like going to the library? Yeah, that makes you a rare and worthwhile person in this day and age, apparently. Seriously, last time I was in a library there were no one there outside of people looking up porn on the computers. Why don't people read more?
(By the by, Miss Arendt, I'm a big fan of your stuff. You have a real understated humor that is simply brilliant. Reminds me of the work of Sarah Haskins. In a perfect world, Yahtzee'd be playing second fiddle.)
I think that you're wrong, of course. But your arguments against mine weren't the best. Give me a couple of hours: busy.Ragdrazi said:Snip.
DRM can be anything from requiring a serial number to forcing players to register their games and submitting to constant legitiacy tests. Steam for example is a form of DRM, and is seen as being a fairly successfull form at that. And as for the destorying the second hand market, well, no developer will be sad to see it disappear.Ragdrazi said:Well now, don't get tetchy. While I'm unwilling to get into a pissing match and count, there seem to be just as many people on this thread who agree with me and who agree with you.
As far as I know, there isn't a form of DRM involving games that does not involve the writing of an image to a physical disk, and that is therefor a completely ineffectual form of piracy control.
If you cannot explain to me how Ea (or even EA) is not using their commercial success as an excuse to destroy a legitimate market, then I'm afraid that you have not presented an argument here.