This...and that's all I can really think of. SKYRIM, BABY!PlasmaFrog said:Let's compare then, shall we? Like appropriate gentlemen!
Modern Warfare 3
- Short, yet possibly detailed campaign that will only run around five hours on the most challenging difficulty
- Most attention in development is focused towards online multilayer and social interaction
- Fees for premium features
- Same rehashed, overused concept that only remains leached due to its impulsive popularity(Deal with it)
The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim
- Trailers depict an impressive and aw-shocking new engine that will render the most beautiful and detailed environments to date, right next to the original Crysis, not to mention impressive and improved animations
- Inside viewers and developers have proclaimed the game to be expansive in terms of exploration, gameplay, and questing
- The introduction of non-scripted major fights
- IT'S FUCKING SKYRIM
I've told my girlfriend not to get my a birthday present, but get me Skyrim when it comes out. (My birthday is on the 9th of October). I naturally refuse to buy any Call of Duty game because they've reduced the quality of single-person play on games, because they had such a great success with Modern Warfare 1 that they leech off that like a chav leeches Jobseekers Allowance(bit o' britishness there). And thanks to that, every person in my school who spends 14 hours a day playing call of duty has now classified themselves as a gamer.TwitchyGamer101 said:Not even gonna bother with MW3. Don't like the company, don't like the "story" they make. Multi-player is probably not going to change, it didn't change much from MW1 to MW2.
To be honest I completely forgot about MW3, thats how much I care about it.
Skyrim, lots of improvements... DUAL WIELDING SWORDS OR SPELLS. Yeah. Skyrim. Oh yeah.
I don't mean to sound like a dick or anything but... /facepalmIce Azure said:Modern Warfare 3. Didn't play Skyrim before, sadly.