*joins other commenters in the stance of "No, really?"*
It's common sense, I don't see why it really needs reporting on or new studies.
It's common sense, I don't see why it really needs reporting on or new studies.
hahahahahahhahaha that made me laugh, they all looked at me in the office funnyTwilight.falls said:What he said. Something tells me that the people doing these studies work at the Department of Redundancy Department.JaredXE said:Wait, so eating while doing a sedate activity makes you fat?
*Looks at expanding waistline* I never would have guessed.....
^^This. I don't think most people read the article, or at least failed to understand.JerrytheBullfrog said:Is everybody just reading the headline and commenting without reading the full article?
The point isn't "doing a sedentary activity plus eating food without exercise makes you fat," it's "eating while splitting your focus and attention means that you're more likely to eat more than you would otherwise, and feel less full afterward."
They're completely different things.
Yeah, I read the article, then wondered what the hell people are on about.JerrytheBullfrog said:Is everybody just reading the headline and commenting without reading the full article?
The point isn't "doing a sedentary activity plus eating food without exercise makes you fat," it's "eating while splitting your focus and attention means that you're more likely to eat more than you would otherwise, and feel less full afterward."
They're completely different things.
Fucking Ninja. >_<dathwampeer said:No shit Sherlock. Even though the real point of this article, that part about splitting attention and it's relation to appetite, is quite interesting.
Still. No shit Sherlock.
Sitting still and eating for long periods of time. Who the fuck would have guessed that was a bad idea.
I think this is an early competitor for the most pointless experiment category from the no shit Sherlock's of 2012 this years winner went to finding out we need air to live also to you want to present any of the awards.dathwampeer said:No shit Sherlock. Even though the real point of this article, that part about splitting attention and it's relation to appetite, is quite interesting.
Still. No shit Sherlock.
Sitting still and eating for long periods of time. Who the fuck would have guessed that was a bad idea.
I'm in the same situation. I live alone, so sitting down to eat without a video on (or book open, or some other distraction) is really boring. It's boring to the point that I think I would rush through eating just to get back to doing something "interesting", and rushing your meal is bad for proper digestion and also leads to overeating.Cursed Frogurt said:Wow, look at the number of people who didn't read the article!
I personally don't eat and play games simultaneously but I DO eat and watch movies or videos simultaneously for pretty much every meal since I now live alone. Hopefully that doesn't have the as severe of an affect. I'd like to think that I don't continuously eat since I already have my proportions laid out before I start eating/watching. When my plate is clear, that's it.
Because you didn't read the actual article, apparently.Trogdor1138 said:*joins other commenters in the stance of "No, really?"*
It's common sense, I don't see why it really needs reporting on or new studies.