So I ask you, Escapists.... What is the Truth?

Barakiel

New member
Nov 30, 2009
69
0
0
We cannot assume what we know is true, or what they know is not.
After all, we could be wrong.

No-one ever knows what is true. There is only what they perceive to be true. Now, a fair few people would claim (and, in fact, this is how it seems to work) that truth is subjective, and that what the majority believe to be true, must be. After all - "fifty million french men can't be wrong!" -But this in itself is not true, since the minority can be utterly correct(I.E. Global Warming).

So I ask you,Escapists - How do you define the truth?
 

Gxas

New member
Sep 4, 2008
3,187
0
0
Provide a lot of evidence and support, there you go. Truth. Provide none, I won't consider your proposition.
 

Caimekaze

New member
Feb 2, 2008
857
0
0
Distorted Stu said:
No no, my good man. Wikipedia.


On a more related note: The truth, in my opinion, is a combination of my own assumptions, the opinions of others and factual evidence.

Once I've decided something is "true", I do not easily change my mind. It takes a lot of convincing, or the presence of new, overwhelming evidence.
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
That as long as my ego remains intact I will never think myself wrong of course.

Hasn't that always been the definition of truth?
 

Barakiel

New member
Nov 30, 2009
69
0
0
Heh, all interesting answers.

However, I believe you may have misread me.

I did say define, not discern, right?

Distorted Stu said:
Google would discern,

SikOseph said:
If a>b and b>c, a>c is true.
and so would a mathematical formula.

Gxas said:
Provide a lot of evidence and support, there you go. Truth. Provide none, I won't consider your proposition.
I'm not exactly trying to prove anything - I believe I was asking for an answer of truth.

(On a side note, Dictionary.com has a wonderful definition, perhaps I should post that so someone else does not)

Caimekaze said:
Distorted Stu said:
No no, my good man. Wikipedia.


On a more related note: The truth, in my opinion, is a combination of my own assumptions, the opinions of others and factual evidence.

Once I've decided something is "true", I do not easily change my mind. It takes a lot of convincing, or the presence of new, overwhelming evidence.
You, however, raise an interesting point.
If you combine assumptions and opinions, (with any amount of "factual" evidence) could you not be wrong?

Come to think of it, how often ARE you wrong?
 

heaventorn

New member
Apr 6, 2009
46
0
0
Truth is a matter of perception. You can argue whatever you want to think truth is until you are blue in the face and it won't matter, because what we perceive as truth is just a bunch of electrical signals in our brain. When it comes down to it, the only absolute truth is numerical, in the fact that 1 is 1.

Lies, on the other hand, are very real.
 

Three Eyed Cyclops

New member
Apr 27, 2009
27
0
0
There are no truths, only things that appear true within our frame of reference. As our frame of reference changes with time so does our understanding, thus things that appear to be the truth are no longer so in light of new information. This is evident in all forms of science and religion.

That said, I personally define 'truths' as ideas that are mostly likely facts. As a result they can be supported by evidence that indicate what is going on. Thus truths are dependent on what my senses tell me and for lack of better observation tools, I have to depend on them to not mislead me.
 

Gxas

New member
Sep 4, 2008
3,187
0
0
Barakiel said:
Gxas said:
Provide a lot of evidence and support, there you go. Truth. Provide none, I won't consider your proposition.
I'm not exactly trying to prove anything - I believe I was asking for an answer of truth.
I'm trying to figure out where you got turned around in my post. You asked for how I tell if something is the truth. My answer is that I know something is the truth if provided with a lot of evidence.
 

Xpwn3ntial

Avid Reader
Dec 22, 2008
8,023
0
0
The truth is just permitted.

Nulla e realle. Tutto e lecito.
(Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.)
 

Caimekaze

New member
Feb 2, 2008
857
0
0
Barakiel said:
Come to think of it, how often ARE you wrong?
Well, that depends. What are we talking about?

On a factual matter, it's not often that I'm wrong; I like to make sure of what I'm saying before I say it.

When it comes to opinions, however, I'm never wrong. It's simple, really; an opinion can't be wrong.
 

Barakiel

New member
Nov 30, 2009
69
0
0
Gxas said:
Barakiel said:
Gxas said:
Provide a lot of evidence and support, there you go. Truth. Provide none, I won't consider your proposition.
I'm not exactly trying to prove anything - I believe I was asking for an answer of truth.
I'm trying to figure out where you got turned around in my post. You asked for how I tell if something is the truth. My answer is that I know something is the truth if provided with a lot of evidence.
And there is where you get turned around.
I never asked HOW you tell if something is the truth, did I?
I asked how you defined what the Truth is.