Woopsie daisy, I meant south UNITED STATES, and my fat ignorant mind used the words south America to describe the south of the BEST MURKA DAT DER IS.Tayh said:How exactly is Texas a part of south america again?
Tell them to google gay animals. If gay animals are not natural then i wonder what is.Black-Toof said:My parents are very homophobic aswell.
Their main argument always boils down to: "It's just not natural!"
ME: "Surely it doesn't matter what they do in their own privacy."
THEM: "It's just not natural!"
ME: "Why?"
THEM: "Because it's just F**kin isn't"
ME: "They can't help how they feel"
THEM: "I don't F**kin care!"
As you can see as soon as the topic arises, they start getting very vocal and angry.
It's just the way they are.
At no point did I ever say that everybody is going to become homosexual.Hazy992 said:So what? If all men had a vasectomy the population would decrease dramatically as well, it doesn't mean it's going to happen. It's a completely pointless argument.Helmholtz Watson said:Until recently with technology, if everybody was gay, population numbers would dramatically decrease.Boudica said:"If you can offer a single piece of irrefutable evidence as to why homosexuality is uniquely destructive, I'll agree with you."
Check-mate!
So then it's not uniquely destructive is it? Why bring it up in that case?Helmholtz Watson said:At no point did I ever say that everybody is going to become homosexual.Hazy992 said:So what? If all men had a vasectomy the population would decrease dramatically as well, it doesn't mean it's going to happen. It's a completely pointless argument.Helmholtz Watson said:Until recently with technology, if everybody was gay, population numbers would dramatically decrease.Boudica said:"If you can offer a single piece of irrefutable evidence as to why homosexuality is uniquely destructive, I'll agree with you."
Check-mate!
It would be uniquely destructive if it did occur.Hazy992 said:So then it's not uniquely destructive is it? Why bring it up in that case?Helmholtz Watson said:At no point did I ever say that everybody is going to become homosexual.Hazy992 said:So what? If all men had a vasectomy the population would decrease dramatically as well, it doesn't mean it's going to happen. It's a completely pointless argument.Helmholtz Watson said:Until recently with technology, if everybody was gay, population numbers would dramatically decrease.Boudica said:"If you can offer a single piece of irrefutable evidence as to why homosexuality is uniquely destructive, I'll agree with you."
Check-mate!
So would all men suddenly having vasectomies. I think you've misunderstood what he meant by uniquely destructiveHelmholtz Watson said:It would be uniquely destructive if it did occur.Hazy992 said:So then it's not uniquely destructive is it? Why bring it up in that case?Helmholtz Watson said:At no point did I ever say that everybody is going to become homosexual.Hazy992 said:So what? If all men had a vasectomy the population would decrease dramatically as well, it doesn't mean it's going to happen. It's a completely pointless argument.Helmholtz Watson said:Until recently with technology, if everybody was gay, population numbers would dramatically decrease.Boudica said:"If you can offer a single piece of irrefutable evidence as to why homosexuality is uniquely destructive, I'll agree with you."
Check-mate!
Perhaps I did, he seems to imply it to mean one thing while I thought it implied another.Hazy992 said:So would all men suddenly having vasectomies. I think you've misunderstood what he meant by uniquely destructiveHelmholtz Watson said:It would be uniquely destructive if it did occur.Hazy992 said:So then it's not uniquely destructive is it? Why bring it up in that case?Helmholtz Watson said:At no point did I ever say that everybody is going to become homosexual.Hazy992 said:So what? If all men had a vasectomy the population would decrease dramatically as well, it doesn't mean it's going to happen. It's a completely pointless argument.Helmholtz Watson said:Until recently with technology, if everybody was gay, population numbers would dramatically decrease.Boudica said:"If you can offer a single piece of irrefutable evidence as to why homosexuality is uniquely destructive, I'll agree with you."
Check-mate!
What he's asking is if there's a way that homosexuality could cause damage to society in a way nothing else could. As everyone being gay and all men getting vasectomies would both cause population decrease homosexuality isn't uniquely destructive in that regard.Helmholtz Watson said:Perhaps I did, he seems to imply it to mean one thing while I thought it implied another.Hazy992 said:So would all men suddenly having vasectomies. I think you've misunderstood what he meant by uniquely destructiveHelmholtz Watson said:It would be uniquely destructive if it did occur.Hazy992 said:So then it's not uniquely destructive is it? Why bring it up in that case?Helmholtz Watson said:At no point did I ever say that everybody is going to become homosexual.Hazy992 said:So what? If all men had a vasectomy the population would decrease dramatically as well, it doesn't mean it's going to happen. It's a completely pointless argument.Helmholtz Watson said:Until recently with technology, if everybody was gay, population numbers would dramatically decrease.Boudica said:"If you can offer a single piece of irrefutable evidence as to why homosexuality is uniquely destructive, I'll agree with you."
Check-mate!
As a Christian I don't judge, its not my job, its the almightys job, my job is tio share my faith and respect everyone, its a hard thing to do. I however disagree with homosexuality as a sin, I care for the people, but as you said I disagree with the lifestyle and sin, it doesn't mean I condemn them, that's their choice to make. All I do is respect everyone. The problem however is most ask for respect but refuse to give it in return and that's where problems arise. I've been labeled a biggot and called a homophobe as a result of it, and that's where the stupidity comes into play, remember there are biggots on both sides, but I still won't resort to personal insults because someone has different beliefs as me, and thats where my next point comes into play, if you want people to take you seriously you need to show respect that you are demanding, its a two way road, insults and labels will just make people deaf, the bible states its wrong, black and white. But at the same time we need to love everyone. Not judge them, remember Christ once said to a mob that was about to stone a women to death for sinning, "Let he without sin cast the first stone" hate the sin not the sinner.DeltaEdge said:There are lots of versus in the Bible that actually address exactly what your parents are doing. Assuming that they are Christian, I would suggest asking to have a serious conversation about the Bible and then point out some key points like "hate sin not the sinner", address exactly how the Bible defines homosexuality, make clear the distinction between love and lust, and other points like how it says you shouldn't judge others because you are equally as bad. Just sit them down, find these parts in the Bible, and talk with your parents about them without being accusatory or telling them point blank, "you arewrong for thinking this way" because no one likes being told they are wrong and will likely start to close up and disregard what you are saying if you act like a jerk about it. That's about the best advice I can give, and if they refuse to even listen to the bible, then there are some serious problems with their Christianity as well and not much can be done about that.