I know we already have a Sonic Mania thread, but I felt like this deserved its own discussion...
So the PC port for Sonic Mania contains the now-infamous Denuvo copy protection system, which requires users to be online to play the game. This apparently was not the intent of the devs, who have stated that they're working on addressing this. Indeed, Sonic PR manager Aaron Webber has even encouraged fans to directly complain to Sega about this.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/08/sonic-mania-pc-version-launches-with-denuvo-online-requirement/
This whole incident begs the question why Denuvo was packaged with the port in the first place given how it's been met with instant derision. As of this posting the game's being inundated with downvotes and negative feedback concerning the situation on the Steam store page (not enough to tank the overall rating, but still a significant amount).
Personally, I find it odd indeed that the devs are acting like they weren't aware of this, which indicates shenanigans on some level. Either the devs knew and are feigning innocence or it was added by a different party like the higher-ups at Sega without their knowledge. But that's just speculation on my part. What do you think about this unexpected fiasco in an otherwise stellar reception for the game?
So the PC port for Sonic Mania contains the now-infamous Denuvo copy protection system, which requires users to be online to play the game. This apparently was not the intent of the devs, who have stated that they're working on addressing this. Indeed, Sonic PR manager Aaron Webber has even encouraged fans to directly complain to Sega about this.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/08/sonic-mania-pc-version-launches-with-denuvo-online-requirement/
This whole incident begs the question why Denuvo was packaged with the port in the first place given how it's been met with instant derision. As of this posting the game's being inundated with downvotes and negative feedback concerning the situation on the Steam store page (not enough to tank the overall rating, but still a significant amount).
Personally, I find it odd indeed that the devs are acting like they weren't aware of this, which indicates shenanigans on some level. Either the devs knew and are feigning innocence or it was added by a different party like the higher-ups at Sega without their knowledge. But that's just speculation on my part. What do you think about this unexpected fiasco in an otherwise stellar reception for the game?