Dys said:
JDKJ said:
Dys said:
JDKJ said:
Dys said:
Gross
negligence, breach of their
privacy policy, removal of a product products ability to to be used for it's
specific purpose (on several counts) and distribution of a product that is below
merchantable quality.
None of that's a "crime."
uhh...Yes, yes breach of contract is very much a crime, it isn't a violent crime, like murder or rape, but in the business world it's pretty much the
only crime. Anyone who's spent even a minimal amount of time studying business law (I'm literally talking 10 minutes here) will be know that each is a crime, and there are preceding cases relating to each offense. I've gone ahead and quoted in some very, very basic links into my previous post....I'm honestly not sure if you're trolling or just completely naive to the law, but either way I'm amazed that anyone would claim that negligence or breaking contract is not a crime :S
It's not. I'm pretty sure that if it was, I'd have discovered that fact during my three years of law school and umpteen years in the practice of law. The recourse for breach of contract and civil negligence is to file suit in civil court. There's no criminal statute in any state or federal penal code that provides for prosecution for breach of contract or civil negligence. I'll bet any amount of money on that. If you're inclined to quickly part with some of your money, then feel free to put some where your mouth is -- you will lose that money. I can guarantee that.
And I clicked your links. They do absolutely nothing to support your contention that the offenses you list are criminal offenses. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero.
...Fine, that is technically right, but Sony have still broken the law in their breach of contract and for intents and purposes that is a crime, they are also almost certainly in breach of government regulations (related to breach of contract) and will probably be fined.
There is obviously going to be a court case, there are civil suits being filed in several western countries and these court cases will be at the public expense. If they government can reduce these costs by exercising it's power to investigate what happened then surely it should.
It is further reasonable for various governments to get involved as "laws" were broken by those who broke into sonys systems... Ultimately, laws and regulations have been broken and the governments should behave accordingly.
I don't want to get into the middle of your discussion, but after reading through this thread, I don't see what contract Sony breached? Every company has to take reasonable precautions with customer data. But that's it - "reasonable", and that's in their judgment, no one elses. If you look at PCI standards for the protection of credit card transactions, they're pretty - let's say "general". It might be true that Sony didn't meet those standards, just as it might be true that they didn't meet Sarbanes-Oxley standards for the protection of systems involved in financial reporting.
But they also might have met those standards as adopted by themselves, meaning that as far as the law is concerned, they're completely innocent of any wrongdoing.
As far as the severity and impact on the American economy is concerned, I just remember that about once every 10 years in my lifetime, some kind of group has pump-and-dumped some part of the entire US stock market for bazillions of dollars, and basically everyone involved just walks away with the cash. Sometimes the government hangs someone from a streetlight, sometimes they gear up and pass a new law, but always way too late to stop the damage, and never in a way that will prevent the next time.