Ghost8585 said:
Wow, another cliche overblown article about Sony marketing. Good work guys. But lets look at this like it actually is instead of sensationalizing it.
Now if readers watched Sony's E3 conference, they would have already known it was coming out, so good job not doing your job. Thumbs up.
I wasn't aware I was employed to watch that conference. Oh no, I missed the conference about stuff I'm not going to get, especially the part about hand-helds which don't interest me anyway! Boy, do I feel foolish!
I know you do. It's okay. We still love you.
Awww. Give me a hug.
Second, Sony is trying to market to young teen girls. Like it or not, this is more or less how you reach out to them. By associating it with what they already like. People who are on this forum think it's stupid, as do I. But guess what, WE are NOT the target audience. Will it work, I doubt it, I just cant see young girls playing video games.
What, you reach out to them by talking down to them? Okay, given the aggravating popularity of Hannah Montana, this could sell, but only to groups who are unlikely to continue using it.
Which is true, I doubt this will work. Like I said in my origional post, I just dont see young teen girls playing on a PSP. But I would like to understand this whole "talking down" thing. Seriously explain it. are people so highly SELF-regarded that anything which doesn't meet your overly-high standards causes you to flip out.
I'm not flipping out. I just made a post about the fact you are apparently 'flipping out' just because some people are annoyed about something. If you want to imagine me hunched over my keyboard, snarling with rage as I spill forth my bitter bile, be my guest. But it's talking down because it slaps a big fat 'OMG' on the front, as if
any girls of that age group couldn't
possibly be interested in something that wasn't designed and marketed like this.
Third, Sony is trying to reach a new demographic, why is everyone so strongly against that? I believe video games need as much exposure and acceptance in society as it can get. Anti-social emo nerds be damned.
Do you really believe they're going to buy it just because it's lilac and has 'OMG!' on the side? Okay, you already said you don't, but the entire point of the OP was that it's not inherently a bad idea for a marketing campaign, but it's so horribly and awkwardly carried out. I bet for every one person who becomes interested in the product because of these adverts, there will be two in the target demographic who will be put off.
I think you're projecting your own persona and therefore opinions onto the target demographic. Also, I think you, and alot of other people are reading FARRRRRR too deep into this, and possibly other ads. When I see an ad for something I'm interested in I don't give a crap about what the company says to me as a person, because it's not a person, its a corporation. I don't care how they try to be my 'buddy'. And I think teen girls can do the same, you're assuming they're sheep. Now who's talking down to them?
Well, I'm not. For a start, I'm not talking to them. Secondly, I never said they would be taken in by this, nor do they need advice on avoiding it. I merely stated that certain people might be annoyed that their age group was being played to as a big fat stereotype.
Lastly, it a friggin PSP in a different color. Seriously, get over yourself. Other colors will always be available, so it's not like your stuck with a feminine looking handheld should you choose to get one. Besides, everyone on this forum seems to hate the PSP, or anything else made by "the boggymen", so why do you care?
We care because it's incredibly patronizing and will put off a lot of people as it reinforces the image of gaming being childish and stupid. Looking on the website, they have a six game list of 'games girlz play', implying that there's nothing else that could interest them. In fact, I didn't even realize games could be divided up based on gender of gamer.
Ever try to teach a younger kid to play a bass guitar (he just got)? Do you show him a dozen Les Claypool and Primus songs, until s/he throws it down in frustration and never pick it up again? OR! Do you teach the kid something like "Learn to Fly" or the pink panther theme song?
I'll answer for you. You teach them something simple first, let 'em get a feel for the sound, and once he gets bored of it (like the girl who buys the PSP with Loco Roco), they move on to more complex songs (games) on their own.
And who's to say that the target demographic can't distinguish between the bullshit fluff of the advertisements and actual product they're selling? Why are people automatically assuming that young girls are too stupid to see there are more games then just Loco Roco and Hanna Montana? It reeks of hypocrisy. Nobody here need too 'save' these girls from mean ole' Mr. Playstaton. If they buy it, great. If they don't, great. At least Sony TRIED.
I never said anything about 'saving' them. I didn't say anything along the lines of "those bastards, how dare they manipulate the people who don't better". In fact, I was more reffering to people in the media nd the general image of gaming. Ignorant people (frequently on Fox news) don't realise that gaming is diverse and has many different styles of games, so when they think of adverts like this, and then think of Grand Theft Auto, they immediately worry about those games can reach their kids.
Not that it's that simple of course, but you get the rough idea.
About 'selling them starting games', it would work much better if they specifically picked out games for any age and then went for quality (Patapon 2 and Loco Roco come under this heading). This would be easier for the Nintendo DS, as they have a large selection of such games. Creating a 'Hannah Montana' bundle and slapping stuff like that all over the website isn't the same, by focusing on getting the right games for the right group, it means anyone who doesn't like that sort of stuff feels alienated.
I can hazard a guess why, because it PlayStation? Give me a break. I know it's trendy to hate PlayStation this generation but it's just so played out, especially when it's the same 4 or 5 excuses over and over. Considering Sony marketing's history and who they are trying to attract, I think this is one of the better thought out advertisements. Certainly beats talking squirrels and possessed babies or whatever.
No, you're thinking of Nintendo. I don't remember 'everyone hating the PSP, or everyone particularly hating Sony on this forum. 'It's better than what they normally do' is not an excuse for a terrible advert.
Actually I think it is. It shows improvement.
Sure. But do you really believe that this shows a consistent trend of improvement, or just that this advert wasn't quite as horrible as previous ones?
PS- For the record, every console maker has a light and dark side. And no this isn't an invite to a console battle, please keep it about the advert
Yes, but when Nintendo made the pink DS or anyone else you had in mind they didn't start an entire marketing campaign around emphasizing how 'it's for girls', so it was just another available color.
I think this may be a fundamental difference between me and you. While I believe that this ad may not work, I like that they tried. You on the other hand think it's the most godforsaken thing on the planet and should have never been attempted. If that is because that is how you are in your own life then I feel sorry for you because you gonna miss alot of cool things and die angry.
Thanks for explaining to me how my mind works. No, I don't think it's the most godforsaken thing on the planet. I can dislike something without vowing to end it even at the cost of my own life.
There's also a fairly thick line between 'trying something new', in the sense of something intrepid and groundbreaking, and making a rubbish advert. If I did hate the former, I would die angry. But I don't. I think I can dislike
one new thing without having to loathe all creations and new ideas.
On a final note, I'd like to mention that the girls in the picture in the OP actually look like they are laughing at whoever is holding the PSP. In short, this advert doesn't make me angry, but instead dismayed at how horribly done it is.
What's stopping you from doing it better then?
It
could have something to do with the fact that I don't work for Sony's marketing department. But I see that you were trying to make a point there, although I'm damned if I know what it was. I may not be able to create a good advert, but it's not hard to identify a bad one. When someone leaves a cinema and says "that film was horrible", do you immediately ask if they have a degree in cinematography, and declare they can't form an opinion if they don't? I can tell what's a bad idea without having to be able to make a good one.