Cartographer said:
Except that didn't answer me. The problem is, people go into the comic stores because of the movies. You're still making a case for the movie harming the comics, yet presenting it as though the comics will harm the movies.
I doubt many Wolverine fans will actually avoid the movies because he's temporarily dead in the comics, either.
So see above:
Zachary Amaranth said:
Can you explain how killing him off in the comics is going to impact the movies in any way? I could see it working the other way around, but comics are niche and X-Men movies are big money. Remember, they made changes to the X-Men comics to fit the movies, not vice vera.
Kumagawa Misogi said:
Because 'First Class' is the worst performing X-men film while 'X2' and 'The Wolverine' are the best performing is why Fox focuses so much on Wolverine.
Where are you getting that? I just checked Box Office Mojo and their numbers say The Wolverine is the worst grossing, behind both Origins and First Class. The same is true of their opening weekends.
Lieju said:
O
It's possible they will be able to tell great stories with his death, but why should I care? Even if it brings major character-development to someone, it won't matter in the long run.
I'd say the good stories in the interim are the only reason to care, period. Tomorrow, they may fuck up any comic. I'm not sure it diminishes the good stories. There have been some really stupid Spider-Man stories, but I still enjoy some of the better ones (and even some of the mediocre ones). Batman has been changed and rebooted and revisioned nine million times, and there are a ton of good arcs there. Civil War was stupid as crap, but it didn't do anything to take away those old comics.
If there are good stories that come from it, it seems the only reason to care. Because if there's one thing I know about comics, someone will eventually do something stupid. A good story, however, will be remembered. Even after a bad one has killed a franchise.