StarCraft II Sells Three Million In a Month

jamesworkshop

New member
Sep 3, 2008
2,683
0
0
3nimac said:
I actually think this is a rather low number considering the scale of things. 1.5 mil in the first two days but only 3 mil after a month? It would seem that the game reached its zenith so close to the release its depressing. I think that everybody who planned to get the game already bought it, and that the ones who didn't are either waiting for a discount or not interested. Now comes the slow decline in popularity and sales... Until the hype train for HotS gets rolling. God knows when that will be. ;)
3 million is good, dragon age made about 3.2million sales and that was on three different platforms.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Deathfish15 said:
John Funk said:
It's an even more impressive number given that the game is 100% exclusive to Windows and Apple PCs.
What's with the condescending tone in that sentence against PC games? Honestly there's more depth and interest in a single PC exclusive game then there is in the whole Halo/Killzone series (take you pick) of all the games of it's squeals put together. What's that? Oh, that's right, it's called S.T.A.L.K.E.R.. How about some Crysis to dish up? Oh, isn't The Witcher 2 coming down the pipe? Exactly!


P.S. Only on the PC would a game like this work so well because of the mod-ability and creativity that it expands on.
What?

Dude, simple numbers game. Multiplatform titles always sell better because they have a larger audience, and the PC always seems to get the least amount of sales between the three major platforms. (see also - any of the COD games, which sell best on 360, usually second on PS3, and (relatively) worst on PC). I wasn't insulting the PC as a platform at all.
 

NotSoNimble

New member
Aug 10, 2010
417
0
0
Most of the sales are from people who pirate the game, then realize they want to buy the game for real. Right?!?

I just wish my 4 year old computer could run it.

: (
 

Gaias

New member
Apr 2, 2009
88
0
0
I wonder how much a Blizzard game would make if it didn't have the 'craft' added to the end of the title?
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
14,347
3,329
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
Mornelithe said:
Worgen said:
if hes going to challenge the fact I said it looks boring to ME then Im taking it to the next level
Is that really a challenge though? He simply pointed out that there are people out there who find entertainment in things you don't. That should honestly be a fairly simple concept to grasp.
yes, if I had said "starcraft 2 sucks and is horrible" then that would be a correct thing to challenge since it makes a broad statement, however since I said "to me" that means its a personal opinion that is not necessarily shared and by countering it he is inferring that my opinion is invalid and therefor we must kung fo fight
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
It's just too bad the campaign is a little dissapointing. Some great features and all, but on the whole it's quite drab (the story I mean).
 

Silver Patriot

Senior Member
Aug 9, 2008
867
0
21
Worgen said:
Mornelithe said:
Worgen said:
if hes going to challenge the fact I said it looks boring to ME then Im taking it to the next level
Is that really a challenge though? He simply pointed out that there are people out there who find entertainment in things you don't. That should honestly be a fairly simple concept to grasp.
yes, if I had said "starcraft 2 sucks and is horrible" then that would be a correct thing to challenge since it makes a broad statement, however since I said "to me" that means its a personal opinion that is not necessarily shared and by countering it he is inferring that my opinion is invalid and therefor we must kung fo fight
And I get to record it and put it on youtube.

OT: Good for Blizzard. Personally I will buy it after I get though the first one. I just can't start with the sequal.
 

ark123

New member
Feb 19, 2009
485
0
0
ionveau said:
geldonyetich said:
I wonder if 3 million sales was enough to offset the tremendous budget they probably spent on the thing's prolonged development.
I bet they spent 2 years updating the models and half a year making the single player, lets be honest starcraft 2 is just WC3

overall they made 180 million and spent maybe 20 on the 30 people making the game full time
SC2 is WC3 in the same way that Killzone, Halo and Call of Duty are all Counter Strike.
 

ionveau

New member
Nov 22, 2009
493
0
0
ark123 said:
ionveau said:
geldonyetich said:
I wonder if 3 million sales was enough to offset the tremendous budget they probably spent on the thing's prolonged development.
I bet they spent 2 years updating the models and half a year making the single player, lets be honest starcraft 2 is just WC3

overall they made 180 million and spent maybe 20 on the 30 people making the game full time
SC2 is WC3 in the same way that Killzone, Halo and Call of Duty are all Counter Strike.
i would agree if only all those games used the same engine and had the same game mechanics
 

ark123

New member
Feb 19, 2009
485
0
0
ionveau said:
ark123 said:
ionveau said:
geldonyetich said:
I wonder if 3 million sales was enough to offset the tremendous budget they probably spent on the thing's prolonged development.
I bet they spent 2 years updating the models and half a year making the single player, lets be honest starcraft 2 is just WC3

overall they made 180 million and spent maybe 20 on the 30 people making the game full time
SC2 is WC3 in the same way that Killzone, Halo and Call of Duty are all Counter Strike.
i would agree if only all those games used the same engine and had the same game mechanics
They do. Get guns, kill the other players with your team.
If you want to be more specific, you'd have to notice WC3 is all about leveling your hero and getting good items for him/they (which is why most games end when the biggest hero dies), while SC2 is about setting up an army composition that will combat the opponent's and scouting constantly to do so. If you ever played the games for more than an hour you'd know how dramatically different they are.
In wc3, you'll hardly ever see a player take more than one expansion. In sc2, it's common to take 3+. In wc3, the hero's ultimate ability will either hurt another hero really bad or destroy a base. In sc2, you have to make enough units to overrun another army if you wanna take out structures.
There are neutral monsters in wc3.
Sc2 maps are much bigger.
Nothing gains experience in sc2.
Towers are actually very expensive in sc2.
I could go on, but I think I made my point. They're nothing alike, and you're only drawing parallels because they're from the same company. It's like saying Sc2 and Diablo are the same game.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
" It's an even more impressive number given that the game is 100 percent exclusive to Windows and Apple PCs. "

As opposed to what? The vast array of Linux gamers?
 

Kaez

New member
Jan 11, 2010
128
0
0
ma55ter_fett said:
In those 3 million people, you think at least one would be worse at the game than I am.
I'm worse at it than you, I just learned during the beta I wasn't good enough to play against anyone else... so I never bought the game... maybe when it gets lower in price I might consider it....
 

acosn

New member
Sep 11, 2008
616
0
0
It's a great core game but they have got to do something about the writing next time around, and for fuck's sake fix the custom map system already.

You know, the one that people said was horrible back in the closed beta?