Sticky aim/aim assist.

Recommended Videos

smeghead25

New member
Apr 28, 2009
421
0
0
Sory to burst your bubble but the sound actually starts when the crosshair is immediately over the target.

Even failing that, lag could be culprit, and also physics. When you swing a rifle around generally the bullet is not going to go exactly where you aim.
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,950
0
0
What the fuck is that? That's not how FPS should be played! I always considered FPS games to be about skill. Aim assist doesn't require skill. I didn't even know consoles had this. Oh my god that is so pathetic. I remember playing B.L.A.C.K. on PS2 couple of years ago. The only FPS on console that I actually enjoyed. That's an awesome game. I don't remember it having aim assist. With a little practice I was able to beat that game on highest difficulty. It's not impossible to play without aim assist. It's just harder. But I suppose they have to include it because most of the players on consoles are 13 year old kids and they don't give a shit. They just want to shoot stuff and scream in your ears.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
omega 616 said:
So I was wondering how screwed would we console gamers be without this massive aid?
I generally turn off sticky aim in any game I can. It screws up my sniper shots to no end.
 

andreas3K

New member
Feb 6, 2010
270
0
0
I play a lot of shooters on consoles and I always turn aim assist off. In my opinion, if you can't hit your target without aim assist, you suck and need some practice.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
I would love it if this crap disappeared. I can't even begin to count the number of times i've had the sight on someones head when his friend runs in front and drags my sight into no-mans land between them right as i take my shot. GARRR. so many lost kills.
 

GBlair88

New member
Jan 10, 2009
773
0
0
omega 616 said:
scnj said:
I don't mind that it's there. When I'm playing a shooter, I want a fairly fast paced experience anyway, and aim assist can really help to streamline shootouts.

That said, it should be much tighter than that, and I get annoyed with it when I start noticing it autocorrecting me a lot during gameplay.
Yeah, it can speed things up but being corrected by 2 inches and bullets curving round corners is a step too far.
If that had been another FPS on the PC he would've been kicked or banned for using an aimbot. He was aiming at least two metres to the right when he fired. If you play a game with autoaim (built in or not) you should not brag about skill because you have little to no actual game skill.

On a side note: No, not all PC players use aimbots or any other type of artificial assistance. Obviously some do but not everyone. Console players should not take the holier than thou attitude when it comes to games as they are quite capable of using glitches and exploits.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
ehh i turn it off whenever i can, mostly in older games i was able to, in newer games i turn it off if its available but for the most part i haven't noticed it too much...besides stupid mw2 and crap, thats the only games where it actually really shows up or affects gameplay.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
Whenever I use the 360 I try not to use it - I switched it off entirely in GTA IV, because between the aim assist and the fucking cover system I would have wanted to kill myself.
 

RooftopAssassin

New member
Sep 13, 2009
356
0
0
You're not forced to use auto-aim in games. I turn it off and I get comparatively better scores than most people. I don't know what PC gamers are talking about when they claim that their controls are better. To me, their pretty much equal.

In PC gaming you have advantages with a mouse, but all your other controls are unresponsive keys. Why the fuck do I have to augment my hand is such a way to move my hand from 'WASD' so I can reach 'Z' 'X' 'C' or any other strangely placed key just to throw a frigging frag grenade?

The benefit of controllers is that you have all the buttons you're ever going to need and they're all there at your fingertips, literally. The downside being that analog sticks aren't very accurate when aiming, but if you use it enough and tweak the settings right, you'll be just fine.
 

pejhmon

New member
Mar 2, 2010
271
0
0
omega 616 said:
scnj said:
I don't mind that it's there. When I'm playing a shooter, I want a fairly fast paced experience anyway, and aim assist can really help to streamline shootouts.

That said, it should be much tighter than that, and I get annoyed with it when I start noticing it autocorrecting me a lot during gameplay.
Yeah, it can speed things up but being corrected by 2 inches and bullets curving round corners is a step too far.
ever watched wanted? ;)
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,950
0
0
RooftopAssassin said:
You're not forced to use auto-aim in games. I turn it off and I get comparatively better scores than most people. I don't know what PC gamers are talking about when they claim that their controls are better. To me, their pretty much equal.

In PC gaming you have advantages with a mouse, but all your other controls are unresponsive keys. Why the fuck do I have to augment my hand is such a way to move my hand from 'WASD' so I can reach 'Z' 'X' 'C' or any other strangely placed key just to throw a frigging frag grenade?

The benefit of controllers is that you have all the buttons you're ever going to need and they're all there at your fingertips, literally. The downside being that analog sticks aren't very accurate when aiming, but if you use it enough and tweak the settings right, you'll be just fine.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Did you know that Microsoft wanted to go cross platform with PC and Xbox 360 but they couldn't because PC gamers kicked console gamers asses? Console gamers couldn't touch PC gamers. PC controls are much more fluid and FPS games are best played on PC. Everyone knows that. You don't move your hand anywhere. It's all in your reach and it's a lot easier and it feels better with a mouse and keyboard. And if some buttons are a little out of reach then you just have to develop some skills.
 

RooftopAssassin

New member
Sep 13, 2009
356
0
0
ImprovizoR said:
RooftopAssassin said:
You're not forced to use auto-aim in games. I turn it off and I get comparatively better scores than most people. I don't know what PC gamers are talking about when they claim that their controls are better. To me, their pretty much equal.

In PC gaming you have advantages with a mouse, but all your other controls are unresponsive keys. Why the fuck do I have to augment my hand is such a way to move my hand from 'WASD' so I can reach 'Z' 'X' 'C' or any other strangely placed key just to throw a frigging frag grenade?

The benefit of controllers is that you have all the buttons you're ever going to need and they're all there at your fingertips, literally. The downside being that analog sticks aren't very accurate when aiming, but if you use it enough and tweak the settings right, you'll be just fine.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Did you know that Microsoft wanted to go cross platform with PC and Xbox 360 but they couldn't because PC gamers kicked console gamers asses? Console gamers couldn't touch PC gamers. PC controls are much more fluid and FPS games are best played on PC. Everyone knows that. You don't move your hand anywhere. It's all in your reach and it's a lot easier and it feels better with a mouse and keyboard. And if some buttons are a little out of reach then you just have to develop some skills.
Proof?

I highly doubt any of that, but if you can show some kind of proof I wouldn't hesitate to believe you.

FYI I do play both and like I said there is no discernible difference between the two.
 

Daffy F

New member
Apr 17, 2009
1,711
0
0
omega 616 said:
Here is the video in question.


I mean, comon! If that was luck, there is a full on hurricane to make that bullet curve to kill the guy.
Actually, I think it hits while he's turning, ad he in fact continues to turn after he fired the shot, while the hit marker stays on-screen. Something I hate though is people getting all high-and-mighty (I'm not saying this is what you're doing, I'm saying I've met people who are like this) about being a PC gamer, and assume that all Console players are 'tards with no skill... It's just so frustrating. It's about as true as saying that every PC gamer has hacks.
 

Daffy F

New member
Apr 17, 2009
1,711
0
0
GBlair88 said:
omega 616 said:
scnj said:
I don't mind that it's there. When I'm playing a shooter, I want a fairly fast paced experience anyway, and aim assist can really help to streamline shootouts.

That said, it should be much tighter than that, and I get annoyed with it when I start noticing it autocorrecting me a lot during gameplay.
Yeah, it can speed things up but being corrected by 2 inches and bullets curving round corners is a step too far.
If that had been another FPS on the PC he would've been kicked or banned for using an aimbot. He was aiming at least two metres to the right when he fired. If you play a game with autoaim (built in or not) you should not brag about skill because you have little to no actual game skill.

On a side note: No, not all PC players use aimbots or any other type of artificial assistance. Obviously some do but not everyone. Console players should not take the holier than thou attitude when it comes to games as they are quite capable of using glitches and exploits.
I take it you're a PC gamer?
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,879
1
43
Daffy F said:
omega 616 said:
Here is the video in question.


I mean, comon! If that was luck, there is a full on hurricane to make that bullet curve to kill the guy.
Actually, I think it hits while he's turning, ad he in fact continues to turn after he fired the shot, while the hit marker stays on-screen. Something I hate though is people getting all high-and-mighty (I'm not saying this is what you're doing, I'm saying I've met people who are like this) about being a PC gamer, and assume that all Console players are 'tards with no skill... It's just so frustrating. It's about as true as saying that every PC gamer has hacks.
Nah, if you click the nano second you hear the gunshot, it is still atleast an inch off I have it paused were the gunshot sound effect hasn't even finished yet and it's nowhere near.

I am a console gamer by the way. I have played very little on PC, 90% of it is RTS.
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,950
0
0
RooftopAssassin said:
ImprovizoR said:
RooftopAssassin said:
You're not forced to use auto-aim in games. I turn it off and I get comparatively better scores than most people. I don't know what PC gamers are talking about when they claim that their controls are better. To me, their pretty much equal.

In PC gaming you have advantages with a mouse, but all your other controls are unresponsive keys. Why the fuck do I have to augment my hand is such a way to move my hand from 'WASD' so I can reach 'Z' 'X' 'C' or any other strangely placed key just to throw a frigging frag grenade?

The benefit of controllers is that you have all the buttons you're ever going to need and they're all there at your fingertips, literally. The downside being that analog sticks aren't very accurate when aiming, but if you use it enough and tweak the settings right, you'll be just fine.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Did you know that Microsoft wanted to go cross platform with PC and Xbox 360 but they couldn't because PC gamers kicked console gamers asses? Console gamers couldn't touch PC gamers. PC controls are much more fluid and FPS games are best played on PC. Everyone knows that. You don't move your hand anywhere. It's all in your reach and it's a lot easier and it feels better with a mouse and keyboard. And if some buttons are a little out of reach then you just have to develop some skills.
Proof?

I highly doubt any of that, but if you can show some kind of proof I wouldn't hesitate to believe you.

FYI I do play both and like I said there is no discernible difference between the two.
The article was on Escapist!
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,773
0
0
ImprovizoR said:
You have no idea what you're talking about. Did you know that Microsoft wanted to go cross platform with PC and Xbox 360 but they couldn't because PC gamers kicked console gamers asses? Console gamers couldn't touch PC gamers. PC controls are much more fluid and FPS games are best played on PC. Everyone knows that. You don't move your hand anywhere. It's all in your reach and it's a lot easier and it feels better with a mouse and keyboard. And if some buttons are a little out of reach then you just have to develop some skills.
Opinions, opinions. Don't we all just love PC elitists? Oh wait... no, we don't.

I have played shooters on console and PC and I much prefer controllers.

I'll take the comfort and the satisfaction of pulling an actual trigger any day over an extra few percent of accuracy.
 

Exort

New member
Oct 11, 2010
647
0
0
ImprovizoR said:
The article was on Escapist!
Yea, I remember reading something like that, but not on escapist. Maybe that is why PC shooter don't have auto aiming.
 

RooftopAssassin

New member
Sep 13, 2009
356
0
0
ImprovizoR said:
RooftopAssassin said:
ImprovizoR said:
RooftopAssassin said:
You're not forced to use auto-aim in games. I turn it off and I get comparatively better scores than most people. I don't know what PC gamers are talking about when they claim that their controls are better. To me, their pretty much equal.

In PC gaming you have advantages with a mouse, but all your other controls are unresponsive keys. Why the fuck do I have to augment my hand is such a way to move my hand from 'WASD' so I can reach 'Z' 'X' 'C' or any other strangely placed key just to throw a frigging frag grenade?

The benefit of controllers is that you have all the buttons you're ever going to need and they're all there at your fingertips, literally. The downside being that analog sticks aren't very accurate when aiming, but if you use it enough and tweak the settings right, you'll be just fine.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Did you know that Microsoft wanted to go cross platform with PC and Xbox 360 but they couldn't because PC gamers kicked console gamers asses? Console gamers couldn't touch PC gamers. PC controls are much more fluid and FPS games are best played on PC. Everyone knows that. You don't move your hand anywhere. It's all in your reach and it's a lot easier and it feels better with a mouse and keyboard. And if some buttons are a little out of reach then you just have to develop some skills.
Proof?

I highly doubt any of that, but if you can show some kind of proof I wouldn't hesitate to believe you.

FYI I do play both and like I said there is no discernible difference between the two.
The article was on Escapist!
I'll look for it, but you know you don't have to read every article on the Escapist, right? Plus I was merely talking from my point of view, maybe I'm just too good?(NAAT!) I quite like K+M combo, but I don't like when there are keys mapped out all weird. I love that every button is so close on a controller. Maybe that's what I should have said.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
Yeah depending on the game the aim assist is either good or bad. It's really helpful for a game like Halo. You have the two extremes of CE which had very little assist, and Halo 2 which had far too much assist.

Personally I think 3 and Reach hit a fairly good sweet spot when it comes to the aim assist.

The CoD series should seriously not give you much. I mean the campaign for MW2 was a cakewalk because of how much you got in singleplayer. Keep tapping the ADS over and over to instaswitch to anything remotely near the center of the crosshairs. It's toned down for online but when people use snipers for "quickscopes" more often than actually looking and sniping I think it's a tad overboard.