It's been a long held annoyance of mine that people will attach the word addiction to anything. I refuse to refer to anything that doesn't bear an adverse biological dependance as an addiction. Cocaine, nicotine, alcohol, perscription drugs, these are legitimate addictions. Gambling, television, and, of course, gaming aren't addictions, they're more in line Obsesive/Compulsive disorders. Show me one case where an individual has suffered withdrawal symptoms from lack of gambling, and I'll reconsider my position. Until then, it's only an addiction if there are negative physical aspects to its long term use and eventual removal.
This annoyance also applies to those who insist on re-branding addictions as diseases.
Last time I checked, one can't simply starve out lymphoma and hepatitis. As terribly awful as heroine withdrawal must be, it is survivable. I would love to be in the room and hear the self perscribing hop-head tell the Multiple Scelrosis patient that they belong in the same group.
Both of theses recent movements are just retconned attempts at buying into a higher funding level, and I think it's pathetic.
This annoyance also applies to those who insist on re-branding addictions as diseases.
Last time I checked, one can't simply starve out lymphoma and hepatitis. As terribly awful as heroine withdrawal must be, it is survivable. I would love to be in the room and hear the self perscribing hop-head tell the Multiple Scelrosis patient that they belong in the same group.
Both of theses recent movements are just retconned attempts at buying into a higher funding level, and I think it's pathetic.