So if I'm understanding you correctly the only reasonable, possible, responsible response is for police to rush in guns drawn and no information on whats going on? Throw elementary students to the floor and hog-tie them to the bottom of their desks?Riotguards said:yes i agree, the police responding to a possible sandy hooks should assess the risk and make sure that its not a prank phone callJohnson McGee said:-snip-
by the way you assume an innocent looking person is innocent, i guess children have never killed people or anyone else for that matter that just looks or acts friendly (yet have murdered people, etc, etc)
gosh darn those police take far too many precautions, why can't they politely knock on the door and ask the bad guy to give his gun up, asking nicely you know because manners matter
Police going into a dangerous situation with detailed information is essential for the safety of the public and the police, here's an example of how poor police communication can result in death: http://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/deadly-dispute-calling-for-accountability-from-the-rcmp-after-former-soldier-shot-dead-1.1483419 , it may be to do with Canada's S.R.U. instead of S.W.A.T. but the lessons are the same. The person who called 911 in the first place, had no weapon of any kind and presented no threat was nonetheless shot dead by police.
As for knocking and asking nicely? Yes, that's exactly what negotiators and crisis-response personnel are trained to do http://www.crisisprevention.com/Resources/Knowledge-Base/General/De-escalation-Tips