Take This Quiz to Find Out Your Chances of Survival

F-I-D-O

I miss my avatar
Feb 18, 2010
1,095
0
0
DSK- said:
Demon ID said:
Jack and Calumon said:
A Warning to others...

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU...

Calumon: Oh here he goes again... >.<
Same, I only got 20%. Me and you should never team up on anything important.
Again, same here. But wait! If all three of us pool resources, that makes 80%! No disaster or catastrophe would dare stand in our way then!
I got a 25%, so we can have a success rate of 105% if we all work together! We could make the disasters work to happen!

Interesting, at 25 it is still a warning to others...
 

Jamash

Top Todger
Jun 25, 2008
3,638
0
0
SODAssault said:
Former boyscout, been in several wilderness survival scenarios and I've got a few gripes that are absolutely driving me crazy.

1) Number eighteen. Climb a tree? Seriously? I'm guessing this answer sounded the best in the realm of speculation, but any survival manual that advocates this would be pulled. By climbing a tree, you're exponentially increasing your chances of serious injury, and you're wasting energy you would be relying on while waiting for rescue. Starting a fire was the answer I went with initially, because it is correct, as a plume of smoke is about as good a signal you'll be able to give off without a flare gun on hand. Get a fire burning hot enough, throw some green vegetation on there, and at the very least, someone will be sent out to investigate a potential wildfire.

2) A child does not stand a better chance of surviving in the woods than a soldier. I don't know if you've ever seen the Army's official wilderness survival guide, but there are things in there that children need to know, but won't, whereas a soldier will. How to find food, how to identify poisonous plants, how to build a shelter, how to maintain one's own health and perform necessary first aid, all those things. It's a romantic notion that children would be more in touch with nature since they're an empty glass, but I'd happily wager that a soldier would be the one to come out of that situation without his flesh transformed into buzzard droppings. I don't know about you, but I hear a lot of stories in the news about kids running away from home and being found dead due to exposure.
I agree with your gripes, and so does this news report featured by the Escapist.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/87231-Body-Found-Near-Barrie-May-Be-Missing-Gamer-UPDATED

This child ran away, climbed a tree, then fell out and died, and although he played a lot of Call of Duty 4, I doubt him being an online soldier lessened his chance of survival.

Like you, I think a lot of the "correct" answers are very dubious, and I hope no one actually takes them as fact... I pity the person fool who finds themselves in a situation where they can only grab one item of clothing before facing the elements, and chooses a hat instead of a jacket.
 

GothmogII

Possessor Of Hats
Apr 6, 2008
2,215
0
0
Take this quiz [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/quizzes/result/84.59-Tourist]

Pfft, I got tourist. Still, 50/50 is better than nothing. I suppose.

Also, Russ Pitts got 100% on his first try in almost two minutes. If he wasn't looking at the answer book, I'd say he must be a lumberjack of incredible survival skills!
 

TheNumber1Zero

Forgot to Remember
Jul 23, 2009
7,345
0
0
Warning to Others... why am I so happy with this result?
Odd Quiz though, but I was happy with the final question.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Jamash said:
SODAssault said:
Geschnippen
I agree with your gripes, and so does this news report featured by the Escapist.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/87231-Body-Found-Near-Barrie-May-Be-Missing-Gamer-UPDATED

This child ran away, climbed a tree, then fell out and died, and although he played a lot of Call of Duty 4, I doubt him being an online soldier lessened his chance of survival.

Like you, I think a lot of the "correct" answers are very dubious, and I hope no one actually takes them as fact... I pity the person fool who finds themselves in a situation where they can only grab one item of clothing before facing the elements, and chooses a hat instead of a jacket.
That's actually one of the first stories that came to mind. I think some of the wrong "correct" answers can be attributed to jumping to conclusions based on other facts. For example, "70% of the body's heat escapes through the head, therefore, a hat would be the most sensible option to maintain one's body heat." Makes sense, but disregards all the other factors that would go into this, such as storage capacity (lot of pockets if you don't have a pack, which distributes weight and diminishes fatigue more effectively than carrying items by hand), available fabric (which can be made into bandages and used for a plethora of other means), camouflage factor (counter-productive when in need of rescue, but certainly more useful than the world's most invisible hat in a situation where evasion is necessary to keep living), a sun shield in a desert environment... you already know what I'm talking about.

I've gone an entire week with nothing but a hatchet, a survival manual and the clothes on my back, but I only scored a 60% on this, and then retook it many, many times. Partially because some of these weren't covered in my training (scouts aren't typically expected to survive a nuclear holocaust), but mostly because even after I'd narrowed it down, I'd gotten every question but one right multiple times because I refused to believe that the "correct" answer was "climb a goddamn tree".
 

FistsOfTinsel

New member
Jun 23, 2008
83
0
0
SODAssault said:
That's actually one of the first stories that came to mind. I think some of the wrong "correct" answers can be attributed to jumping to conclusions based on other facts. For example, "70% of the body's heat escapes through the head, therefore, a hat would be the most sensible option to maintain one's body heat." Makes sense, but disregards all the other factors that would go into this, such as storage capacity (lot of pockets if you don't have a pack, which distributes weight and diminishes fatigue more effectively than carrying items by hand), available fabric (which can be made into bandages and used for a plethora of other means), camouflage factor (counter-productive when in need of rescue, but certainly more useful than the world's most invisible hat in a situation where evasion is necessary to keep living), a sun shield in a desert environment... you already know what I'm talking about.

I've gone an entire week with nothing but a hatchet, a survival manual and the clothes on my back, but I only scored a 60% on this, and then retook it many, many times. Partially because some of these weren't covered in my training (scouts aren't typically expected to survive a nuclear holocaust), but mostly because even after I'd narrowed it down, I'd gotten every question but one right multiple times because I refused to believe that the "correct" answer was "climb a goddamn tree".
The hat answer is particularly egregious. Although I got it right, I know that it's a myth, and not just for the reasons you list (storage capacity, etc.). The fact is, the "70% of heat is lost through the head" is just plain false: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/dec/17/medicalresearch-humanbehaviour . The Escapist is doing a disservice to their readers in making them believe that a warm hat will be superior to a warm coat in a survival situation. Anybody who ever grew up in a cold climate (Minnesota here) could tell you that this bit of "advice" is just plain ridiculous.
 

Aenir

New member
Mar 26, 2009
437
0
0
crudus" post="7.201306.6697172 said:
Number 11. The rescue dog with the brandy isn't entirely bullshit. The logic I found behind it is you drink it and keep close to the dog that is letting off a ton and a half of heat and the dog brings you to safety. The brandy isn't so much to help you survive as it is to prevent frostbite on her extremities since you have a source of heat that is walking you home. Though I doubt a St. Bernard (that's what those dogs were right?) has actually carried brandy to help rescue people that is the logic I see behind it.
The dog's body heat greatly helps. The brandy, however, which was the choice (not Dog with Brandy), Russ is spot-on about. Myth Busters ftw.
 

Stone Cold Monkey

New member
Mar 5, 2008
97
0
0
Anyone using this quiz to better educate themselves on wilderness survival is looking to be 'a warning to others.' While most of the criticisms I read are correct, the one question in the comments above that is being accused of wrong is the tent vs ground cover. While a tent has a piece of material separating you from the earth. I can tell you from personal experience, you will never be able to warm cold, wet ground. A ground pad or even tree branches that you keep off the ground will keep the earth from sapping your body heat. There are other errors within the quiz that I saw, but I would have to take notes of the quiz to address them one at a time and they will probably be addressed. Of course what do I know, I've only had soldier wilderness survival training, so a child climbing a tree drinking his own urine could survive better than myself. I must have just got lucky that one week I had to survive on my own.
 

FistsOfTinsel

New member
Jun 23, 2008
83
0
0
SODAssault said:
Former boyscout, been in several wilderness survival scenarios and I've got a few gripes that are absolutely driving me crazy.

1) Number eighteen. Climb a tree? Seriously? ...

2) A child does not stand a better chance of surviving in the woods than a soldier ...

3) The purest and most readily available source of water is condensation ...

4) As was mentioned by someone else, a tent is an all-in-one elemental guardian. ...
I agree with everything you wrote, but you should know that the old "70% of heat is lost through your head" is completely bogus; see my other post here.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
addeB said:
Haha, I loved the holy grail reference! :D

You scored 45%! You're a...
Tourist

You can handle most crises and have a decent chance of making it through to the other side.
This is the same I got, wasn't so sure on some but atleast I didn't bomb out completely.
 

Ithera

New member
Apr 4, 2010
449
0
0
Take this quiz [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/quizzes/result/84.59-Tourist]

Utter rubbish...again. Some distilled Urine anybody?
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
Tourist 45% first try

HK_01 said:
I'm a tourist. Great.

Warning: One of the answers is about to be given in this spoiler. Sorry about it, but I just had to say this(don't read if you haven't got the "Who's most likely to survive?" question yet, please).
Edit: Okay, WTF?!? How's a child more likely to survive in the wild then a soldier? I don't know about the US, but in Switzerland and Germany going into the "wild" is part of the training in the army. Okay, so soldiers are trained to ignore risks, but how on earth would a child know what it can eat? How would it know where to get food? How to hunt? How to act in such a situation of extreme stress? Children are not capable of surviving on their ownm, they need adults to take care of them.
Yeah that sounds very wrong, I answered what you did too, I think.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
BigBoote66 said:
SODAssault said:
Former boyscout, been in several wilderness survival scenarios and I've got a few gripes that are absolutely driving me crazy.

1) Number eighteen. Climb a tree? Seriously? ...

2) A child does not stand a better chance of surviving in the woods than a soldier ...

3) The purest and most readily available source of water is condensation ...

4) As was mentioned by someone else, a tent is an all-in-one elemental guardian. ...
I agree with everything you wrote, but you should know that the old "70% of heat is lost through your head" is completely bogus; see my other post here.
We're both in agreement, there. Given the choice between a hat and a jacket, you should take the jacket. I didn't really get my panties in a twist over that question, though, since it presented the unrealistic scenario of only having time to grab one. Total crap, but relatively harmless and not an overtly outrageous thing to say, seeing as how widely it's believed.

Nailed it on the first try since I grew up being told by my parents that I should get a haircut because I'll die of heat exhaustion in summer due to some bogus made-up figure about all heat escaping through my head (really didn't even buy it as a kid), and figured it would be the right answer (considering the other questions).