Take-Two Deal Was a "Waste of Ink"

Logan Frederick

New member
Aug 19, 2006
1,963
0
0
Take-Two Deal Was a "Waste of Ink"



Electronic Arts Chief Executive Officer John Riccitiello, who believes Take-Two's stock and shareholders want an acquisition, is considering the lost deal as a "waste of ink, primarily in the New York Post."

If I spent half a year and billions of dollars to try and acquire a competitor with a lavish offer and the deal collapsed, I'd probably be at least a bit bitter. John Riccitiello, whose public battle to takeover Take-Two Interactive came to a close [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/86600] a couple weeks ago when the Take-Two Board of Directors dismissed EA's acquisition offer, isn't sweating the events of the past year.

The initial offer was proposed in February, months prior to the next release in Take-Two's top franchise, Grand Theft Auto IV. EA pressured Take-Two because ""time was of the essence, because we wanted to impact holiday 2008 sales of Grand Theft Auto IV," according to Riccitiello.

He believes his company acted patiently, listening to Take-Two's request for deliberation time. "Take-Two told us to wait and that they wanted more money. We waited. We went through a variety of steps. The gap [in price] remained," explained the EA executive.

Riccitiello still doubts Take-Two's ability to remain independent. His feels his decision to assist Take-Two was possibly charitable, as he wanted "to help that company get through what has been an uneven profit experience," while many of Take-Two's non-GTA or Bioshock have failed to recoup development costs or increase profits.

A representative of financial services company BMO Capital Markets doesn't feel EA needs Take-Two. Instead, the big losers were Take-Two shareholders, especially traders betting on the acceptance of the deal to reap high buyout gains. Many of them have taken losses as the deal, the general market and Take-Two's share price have all collapsed.

BMO doubts there is another stock savior on the horizon with the current short of the economy. The company wrote, "We do not believe there is another serious bidder for Take-Two in the short term."

Source: Wall Street Journal [http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/10/14/electronic-artstake-two-we-were-just-trying-to-help/] via GamesIndustry [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/riccitiello-take-two-deal-was-waste-of-ink]

Permalink
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
ability to remain independent.
You guys not running spell checkers on your articles anymore? ;)

I'm kinda glad they rejected EAs offer in the long run. The money would have helped, sure, but isn't that what people generally refer to as "dirty money"?
 

TomNook

New member
Feb 21, 2008
821
0
0
Its like EA broke up with Take-Two, EA is the guys who can't let go and TT is the girl who already has a date on Friday.
 

TsunamiWombat

New member
Sep 6, 2008
5,870
0
0
A representative of financial services company BMO Capital Markets doesn't feel EA needs Take-Two. Instead, the big losers were Take-Two shareholders, especially traders betting on the acceptance of the deal to reap high buyout gains. Many of them have taken losses as the deal, the general market and Take-Two's share price have all collapsed.
The problem is EA has f**ked Take Two up, like some bad syphillitic prostitute. Their little hissyfit has caused their market value and stock to drop, hurting the company. It was a dick move in general, EA is full of shit and just trying to hedge it's bets against potential competition. They got their in either case- they don't own Take Two, but TT's suffered some serious setbacks.

Riccitiello still doubts Take-Two's ability to remain independent. His feels his decision to assist Take-Two was possibly charitable, as he wanted "to help that company get through what has been an uneven profit experience," while many of Take-Two's non-GTA or Bioshock have failed to recoup development costs or increase profits.
My ass. They're ambulance chasers. Vultures. Parasites. Words cannot describe how disgusted I am by the callous, cutthroat bullshit- not just because they DID it, but because they try to hide it behind fake charity and snide remarks.

We can just hope EA is up it's own ass and Take-Two isn't actually in any major trouble- the fact they wanted it before GTA4 and the Christmas Season shows they fear the selling potential of their titles this holiday season. We need to rise up as one and financially support Take Two in this hour, just to give EA a giant finger.

EDIT:

Maybe I got a little too hot under the collar- just, this and the "EA Chief hates DRM" story, WOW. The mans arrogance and condescension just hit a nerve, and I wanted to chew out his larynx. It really offended me- but I still want to play some of their games, so I dunno what to do. Just not buy them? Anyway I apologize for the coarse language I used to describe Mr. Riccitiello and EA, he just jammed a button of mine REALLY HARD and it set me off.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
I'm sure with all the money they are likely to make with Bioshock on the PS3, the Bioshock sequel and movie, not to mention their other games, Take Two will be shedding many tears... of joy... all the way to the bank.

I love the spin wizards at EA. They must be the hardest working people in the gaming industry.
 

ElArabDeMagnifico

New member
Dec 20, 2007
3,775
0
0
I always wondered what it would be like if EA made GTA.

Yeah I know "don't even say that!" - but it's fun to speculate.

"Heeey coousiin! Lets come home and play Maadeeen!"