Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Co-Creator: Movie Designs "Fix What Isn't Broken"

roseofbattle

News Room Contributor
Apr 18, 2011
2,306
0
0
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Co-Creator: Movie Designs "Fix What Isn't Broken"

Peter Laird, co-creator of of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is unhappy about some of the design choices for the Michael Bay-produced movie, but above all he plans to wait and see before making a final verdict.

Peter Laird and co-creator Kevin Eastman birthed the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles comic in 1984. Across several decades, the series has taken different turns under different creative directors and artists. With the release of the trailer for the Michael Bay-produced movie, Laird has given his perspective on the redesign of the Turtles - and it's not glowing praise.

"I was impressed with what I saw of the production values... but the changes to the basic design of the Turtles seemed to me to fall into the 'fixing what is not broken' category," Laird said.

The Turtles originally had a noseless beak appearance. Laird points to Jim Henson's Creature Shop team's rendering of the Turtles via rubber and paint as the best live action translation. The Michael Bay's Turtles, however, have noses and expressive lips. In addition to the color-coded masks, the new Turtles wear additional accessories, such as bamboo armor, goggles, a shark tooth necklace, sunglasses, and a do-rag. Laird finds it all a bit too silly - and above all, extraneous.

"Perhaps it's just my personal preference, but the 'noseless beak' look for the Turtles which Kevin and I used in all of our comics, and in pretty much all of the licensed material during the Mirage days... is, in my opinion, a great way to immediately show that these guys are not human," Laird said. "They're mutated reptiles. Creatures."

Even so, Laird isn't jumping to firm conclusions yet. "Of course, I could be wrong about the new design - maybe in the context of the movie it will work fine," he continued. "From what I have seen so far, it is an excellent example of the state-of-the-art character CGI. Perhaps it will become more popular than the noseless style which was used for the first twenty-five years. I guess we'll have to wait and see."

Source: ComicBookMovie [http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=97678]

Permalink
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Apr 10, 2020
17,027
1,086
118
Country
Argentina
The turtles have never looked good in live-action. They didn't look good back in the costumed films and they don't look good now that they're CGI. They're only passable in the comics, or in 2D animation.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
It's not fixing what isn't broken, it's making them look like generic warrior 1109040 to appeal to whoever. I don't mind another artist take on a classic franchise though, but I don't see how the nose and lips adds any thing.
 

Trishbot

New member
May 10, 2011
1,318
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
The turtles have never looked good in live-action. They didn't look good back in the costumed films and they don't look good now that they're CGI. They're only passable in the comics, or in 2D animation.
That may be opinion, but I STILL think that, nearly 20 years later, those costumes looked FANTASTIC.


Granted, they got worse and worse as the movies went on, but they were detailed, animated, and even flexible enough to allow their performers to do all the kicks and flips required from a 90's era action movie. I STILL prefer that over the CG iterations we've seen recently.
 

ShinobiJedi42

New member
May 7, 2012
79
0
0
This doesn't surprise me. Laird also didn't like what the animated series did with the characters. He wrote the comics imagining a more dark, violent, and serious feel and tone while the animated series made it kid-friendly and funny with fart jokes and pizza. I don't see a problem with that, I grew up on it, but it seems to me that Laird hasn't liked anything anyone else has done with the Turtles.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Considering the original turtles were changed to make them more child friendly, i dont think he can complain about these new changes.
 

Twyce

Mostly a Lurker
Apr 1, 2009
183
0
0
Trishbot said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
That may be opinion, but I STILL think that, nearly 20 years later, those costumes looked FANTASTIC.


Granted, they got worse and worse as the movies went on, but they were detailed, animated, and even flexible enough to allow their performers to do all the kicks and flips required from a 90's era action movie. I STILL prefer that over the CG iterations we've seen recently.
I'm with you there. Loved the original movie's look for the Turtles and still think it holds up welltoday. Jim Henson's Creature Shop did amazing work.
 

VoidWanderer

New member
Sep 17, 2011
1,551
0
0
Disclaimer: I haven't seen the whole trailer just the bits from Moviebob's chat about it.

But the nose looks wrong, and since last time i checked April O'neil was a reporter, why faint in front of the BIGGEST NEWS STORY OF YOUR FUCKING LIFE!? She is not some fan-girl meeting her idol, she is looking for her big break. Also, what is with her fainting anyway, I could figure out if she was having a seizure or orgasm!

The whole 'we created the Turtles' is wrong, and honestly, I would have preferred if he went with 'The Turtles are aliens' thing. It would have made sense... Well, a little more anyway.
 

TheMemoman

New member
Mar 11, 2013
130
0
0
Looks at those lips on Leonardo! Don't you just want to kiss them?! There's our handsome protagonist!
 

Middle_Index

Stoner/Metaller
Mar 6, 2014
45
0
0
TheMemoman said:
Looks at those lips on Leonardo! Don't you just want to kiss them?! There's our handsome protagonist!
So April O'Neill (who is not ginger) is going to smooch a turtle i guess.

This looks awful.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Eh, I'll withhold judgement on the matter. I am actually looking forward to how the action will look. I grew up watching the turtles, then when I was a bit older switched to the comics. I even am OK with most recent animated shows. All I know is that this should be easier to watch than Transformers because the Turtles don't have 90 million simultaneous moving parts. At the end of the day, they were going to make changes, that was unavoidable. The thing that I found strange is how large they are. They weren't that much bigger than the average human in the comics or the original show or even the first movies.

I will say this: Why in the hell is the Shredder not a Japanese guy. Oroku Saki is clearly a Japanese name, the character was ALWAYS portrayed as a Japanese guy. I can take some visual changes of the Turtles, but that kind of messes up stuff for me. Well, maybe there will be a good reason for it. Time will tell.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Trishbot said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
The turtles have never looked good in live-action. They didn't look good back in the costumed films and they don't look good now that they're CGI. They're only passable in the comics, or in 2D animation.
That may be opinion, but I STILL think that, nearly 20 years later, those costumes looked FANTASTIC.


Granted, they got worse and worse as the movies went on, but they were detailed, animated, and even flexible enough to allow their performers to do all the kicks and flips required from a 90's era action movie. I STILL prefer that over the CG iterations we've seen recently.
I'm with you. Personally, I'll take practical effects over CG 9 times out of 10 if you can accomplish the same thing with it that you're trying to do without it. Not to mention that CG just seems to be getting worse and worse these days. I'd rather see those practical effects updated for the modern day and complemented by the use of CG where necessary. Making everything CG just doesn't work for me. It leaves you with either hundreds of artists working on it under tight time constraints and having the quality fluctuate from scene to scene, or not enough artists working on it and having the quality fluctuate. Instead we should be using CG more sparingly and spending more time and money on those shots where it is needed so that you can maintain the quality necessary to actually fool people.
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0
Trishbot said:
That may be opinion, but I STILL think that, nearly 20 years later, those costumes looked FANTASTIC.


Granted, they got worse and worse as the movies went on, but they were detailed, animated, and even flexible enough to allow their performers to do all the kicks and flips required from a 90's era action movie. I STILL prefer that over the CG iterations we've seen recently.
I agree, those costumes, while admittedly clumsy, beat almost anything done in CGI nowadays, especially the animatronic heads, they're still pretty impressive.

OT: Well... that's my notion with the new turtles design, "wait and see".
 

ExtraDebit

New member
Jul 16, 2011
533
0
0
No one thought it's silly they wore mask? Mask was traditionally used to conceal who we are, the way TMNT does it just defeats the purpose first by giving it color code so we KNOW who's wearing the mask and second we already KNOW who's wearing the mask. There's only 4 of them in the world!

The word "ninja" literally means "hidden one" and if they still exist today they wouldn't be wearing mask or things that get them attention, they'll be wearing suit and tie or a hoodie to blend in with everyone else.
 

Hairless Mammoth

New member
Jan 23, 2013
1,595
0
0
They look like a darker and edgier reboot version. The original movies made them look competent in martial arts, but fun loving jokers simultaneously. They couldn't go with that kind of look? They just had to make the Turtles have an image like the no-nonsense space marines present in FPSes just to draw in the frat boy crowd.

Also, why can't they build on the old costumes. CGI may have come far from the Tron days. But, practical effects have too. The costumes looked fine for late 80's. Why can't today's artists armed with more modern latex and other materials get a chance to make a realistic looking character? From what I here, CGI isn't cheap, so it can't be done for cost reasons. It's laziness. They rather do something with a dude in a blue or green full body suit and adjust things in post-production than make sure everything looks good for a few takes, right when filming a scene.
VoidWanderer said:
Disclaimer: I haven't seen the whole trailer just the bits from Moviebob's chat about it.

But the nose looks wrong, and since last time i checked April O'neil was a reporter, why faint in front of the BIGGEST NEWS STORY OF YOUR FUCKING LIFE!? She is not some fan-girl meeting her idol, she is looking for her big break. Also, what is with her fainting anyway, I could figure out if she was having a seizure or orgasm!

The whole 'we created the Turtles' is wrong, and honestly, I would have preferred if he went with 'The Turtles are aliens' thing. It would have made sense... Well, a little more anyway.
April O'Neal fainting is from the writers being twits who think the "fainting woman seeing an extraordinary sight" trope is still fresh and hasn't been beating worse than the pile of mush that was once a dead horse. As for the seizure/orgasm, It's Megan Fox. She probably doesn't know the difference, and Bay left it in because she was cast in the female lead role solely to attract more guys who think TMNT is for kids otherwise.
 
Oct 20, 2010
424
0
0
ExtraDebit said:
No one thought it's silly they wore mask? Mask was traditionally used to conceal who we are, the way TMNT does it just defeats the purpose first by giving it color code so we KNOW who's wearing the mask and second we already KNOW who's wearing the mask. There's only 4 of them in the world!

The word "ninja" literally means "hidden one" and if they still exist today they wouldn't be wearing mask or things that get them attention, they'll be wearing suit and tie or a hoodie to blend in with everyone else.
1) They wear headbands, not masks. This was because in the 80's, wearing a headband = martial artist, especially a red one (as they ALL wore in the original comics). They conceal themselves by actually HIDING and being stealthy. The reason for the Eye-holes, is that there is no room on their head to do it another way.

2)You are correct about the concealing clothes, the whole Pyjamas thing is a western misunderstanding of an old Japanese theater trope. whereby the Ninja was disguised as one of the stage hands, who wore all black so as not to be seen as part of the show. Feudal lords also made their servants dress all in black, and conceal their faces so the Lords would not have to Sully their eyes by looking on any peasants. You can only imagine how EASY that mad life for the Ninja for a while.

3) They're Ninja. If you DO see them, and notice the color of their masks, you are already dead.
 

ShakerSilver

Professional Procrastinator
Nov 13, 2009
885
0
0


I can't say I'm happy with the designs either.
I mean really, a do-rag and shades for Raph? Taped-glasses and goggles for Don? Could they not properly write personalities for them so they had to give them features to constantly remind us which ones were "the tough one" and "the smart one"? I thought the bandanas were enough to tell them apart.