I don't even know why people think they can text & drive safely at the same time.
Shit, I can't even text and walk without running into something.
Shit, I can't even text and walk without running into something.
I could be wrong, but I think that the question wasn't so much "does it help if people stop texting while driving", it was "does making it illegal actually cause people to stop doing it". And apparently, the answer is at least a partial yes.lacktheknack said:Seriously? Anyone doubted that taking attention-grabbing devices out of peoples' hands made them less likely to miss things while driving?
Maybe I'm just entirely single-track minded, but I have difficulty checking my mirrors for more than a second without losing my sense of direction, so extended glances at one's hand seemed like the absolute worst idea ever to me already.
I seriously looked that up to see if it were true, because that seemed too stupid beyond belief. And not only did I find it to be true, he was also a University student...Windknight said:Well, we enforce the use of seatbelts too. Some Americans don't like their freedoms being impinged by too many rules and laws. (I always remember the case of the guy who vehemently campaigned against laws enforcing seatbelt use being killed in an a car accident that everyone else survived because they wore seatbelts)
That's what frustrates me about these laws. There shouldn't be anything functionally different than doing that from tuning your radio, yet we still have radios in cars. Really, the distracted driving laws should be enough to cover these issues, and not demonize the devices themselves.lee1287 said:I've got an AUX cable, and i hold my phone for flicking through songs, i'd like to say that's not bad, but i think i'd get pulled over, even though i take my eyes off the road for about half a second at a time.
Its not. Mobile phones were around for a while now. its been illegal to text and drive here for before i even got my license in 2008. policy can and should be kept up, if it isnt then the one making policy should be fired and a better person hired.Rhykker said:I think it's a matter of policy not being to keep up with technology. New technologies emerge quickly; new laws can take very long to come into effect, as bureaucracy can slow things down.
That's what I like about the UK, even though we have laws specifically for phones, if the police catch you doing anything with your hands other than controlling the vehicle you are deemed to "not be in proper control of a motor vehicle" or somesuch and you'll get a slapped wrist/fine/points depending on the context.Signa said:That's what frustrates me about these laws. There shouldn't be anything functionally different than doing that from tuning your radio, yet we still have radios in cars. Really, the distracted driving laws should be enough to cover these issues, and not demonize the devices themselves.lee1287 said:I've got an AUX cable, and i hold my phone for flicking through songs, i'd like to say that's not bad, but i think i'd get pulled over, even though i take my eyes off the road for about half a second at a time.