The Almighty Thor Looks Even Worse Than Titanic 2

ironlordthemad

New member
Sep 25, 2009
502
0
0
You know whats a shame, those wierd dog/hammerhead shark deamons look pretty cool. What else says unnatural horror like a hammerhead shark with legs.
Actually they look kind of like the creatures from Pitch Black...

But the weapons in this movie look like shit. Seriously? Those hammers look like blocks of cheese painted silver.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
I don't enjoy their films, but I'm very much "pro" what they do. C'mon, tongue in cheek b-movies, budget special effects, films made for fun rather than for massive monetary gain. If they were a bit more exploitative, then I think I'd watch them....
 

Random berk

New member
Sep 1, 2010
9,636
0
0
So, how and why has this studio gotten away with making all these movies anyway? First off, nearly all of them are blatant ripoffs of a real movie, how is it that nobody is suing them for some kind of copyright? And even if they have enough loopholes to avoid lawsuits, who actually watches these movies other than drunk or stoned college students when they'e completely run out of other things to occupy them? I've seen a fair few Syfy movies, and I've never been able to actually sit through one.
 

norwegian-guy

New member
Jan 17, 2011
266
0
0
Snake Plissken said:
I'm not terribly certain why everyone is mocking this. Have you guys SEEN that trailer for "actual" Thor film? It looks godawful...
Something tells me you have never seen an Asylum-movie. Their so bad it isn't even funny.
 

awatkins

New member
Oct 17, 2008
91
0
0
I'm just throwing it out there but think of this;
Everytime there is a movie based on a well like comic book character there is also a whole community of ppl out there who immediatly shun and boo the whole thing. Words like 'worst crap ever', 'bad representation', 'make the comic look bad'....float around like flies at a picnic. The outrage comming from fanboys on the internet is literally palpable. And why?
I think it's because these ppl (having seen their heroes, their perfect fantasy figures who've existed 10% on paper and ink, and 90% in their own minds) have created an imaginary sancuary in their minds where these figures are beyond perfect. They can do no wrong, and never be lame. But seeing a live action movie staring someone's fantasy hero brings home reality, it shatters the illusionary fantasy that these characters exist solely in the relm of 'cool and awesome'. These ppl realise for the first time in their lives that perhaps their comic book hero, the powers, the suits, the back stories, the badguys and dames who get captured; it is all just a bit rediculous. It is silly. It is childish. It is not adult. And most importantly; the movie is only working with the 10% that ppl see from the comics and can never, ever hope to include the other 90% fabricated by every fanboy to read the comics. It is dissapointment to the fan along with dissillusionment.
You're comic book hero and his/her story is silly. It's a fantasy and wont ever look in real life the same as your imagination. Get over it. Enjoy it for what it is. A Fantasy Movie based on a comic.
 

Ziggy

New member
Jul 13, 2010
252
0
0
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
I'm sort of disappointed that the summary decided to use the word 'armageddon' instead of Ragnarok...

And I, uh... what is this?
I thought it was just a sketch or a mock trailer, but apparently it isn't?
and hell instead of Niflheim
I sort of tolerated Hell, because it didn't sound too far from Hel, which after all is supposed to be located in Niflheim.
Hel is "the ruler" in Niflheim and is loki's daughter
 

FogHornG36

New member
Jan 29, 2011
649
0
0
better hope Kevin Nash doesn't run in the movie, he will tare his quad... god i hope somebody gets that...
 

Polyg0n

New member
Jul 16, 2009
304
0
0
For a second there I thought that this was a trailer for the Marvels Thor movie, but for once I'm glad that I was wrong.
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
I'm sort of disappointed that the summary decided to use the word 'armageddon' instead of Ragnarok...

And I, uh... what is this?
I thought it was just a sketch or a mock trailer, but apparently it isn't?
and hell instead of Niflheim
I sort of tolerated Hell, because it didn't sound too far from Hel, which after all is supposed to be located in Niflheim.
Hel is "the ruler" in Niflheim and is loki's daughter
Hel, the woman, rules over Hel, also called Helheim. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hel_%28realm%29
The same way that Hades rules over Hades.

Niflheim was one of the first locations to exist, along with Muspelheim.
The warm air from Muspelheim met the cold air from Niflheim in Gunningagap, and formed Yme.
 

Coffinshaker

New member
Feb 16, 2011
208
0
0
wow, just awful! but explain this to me... for a cable channel that refuses to continue quality shows like Caprica or StarGate (insert version here), they play this kinda thing. man, I remember when SciFi used to play all sorts of great stuff, regardless if it was a "b-movie" quality (again referencing the tv shows). then there's this! I'm confused with your logic SciFi!

also, poor form for releasing this within days of the actual Thor movie. I'm guessing they figure enough people will be confused and watch this on the tv instead of the theaters.