The Almighty Thor Looks Even Worse Than Titanic 2

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
I'm sort of disappointed that the summary decided to use the word 'armageddon' instead of Ragnarok...

And I, uh... what is this?
I thought it was just a sketch or a mock trailer, but apparently it isn't?
and hell instead of Niflheim
I sort of tolerated Hell, because it didn't sound too far from Hel, which after all is supposed to be located in Niflheim.
Hel is "the ruler" in Niflheim and is loki's daughter
Hel, the woman, rules over Hel, also called Helheim. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hel_%28realm%29
The same way that Hades rules over Hades.

Niflheim was one of the first locations to exist, along with Muspelheim.
The warm air from Muspelheim met the cold air from Niflheim in Gunningagap, and formed Yme.
and as amazing as is sounds, they still change it into... well you saw the trailer.
old religion and other old stuff are good enough. why do they fell the need to change it. if i go to a movie about norse mythology, i want it to be norse mythology.
I don't know if the target audience of Almighty Thor are very interested. They just want some action and a familiar setting.

Edit: Also, what's the deal with Mjolnir? It looks bloody silly in that trailer.
the sad truth. and why did they make loki evil. he may be a Trickster but he is not evil.
also, he is odin's blood brother, and odin have Gungnir. why and how should loki kill him
Something as complex as a character who isn't one-dimensionally evil is too much for the target audience to handle. It gets too complicated.

I can imagine Loki somehow managing to kill Odin though, through some clever plot-device. He is a tricky one; after all he did do Baldur in.
 

Ziggy

New member
Jul 13, 2010
252
0
0
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
I'm sort of disappointed that the summary decided to use the word 'armageddon' instead of Ragnarok...

And I, uh... what is this?
I thought it was just a sketch or a mock trailer, but apparently it isn't?
and hell instead of Niflheim
I sort of tolerated Hell, because it didn't sound too far from Hel, which after all is supposed to be located in Niflheim.
Hel is "the ruler" in Niflheim and is loki's daughter
Hel, the woman, rules over Hel, also called Helheim. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hel_%28realm%29
The same way that Hades rules over Hades.

Niflheim was one of the first locations to exist, along with Muspelheim.
The warm air from Muspelheim met the cold air from Niflheim in Gunningagap, and formed Yme.
and as amazing as is sounds, they still change it into... well you saw the trailer.
old religion and other old stuff are good enough. why do they fell the need to change it. if i go to a movie about norse mythology, i want it to be norse mythology.
I don't know if the target audience of Almighty Thor are very interested. They just want some action and a familiar setting.

Edit: Also, what's the deal with Mjolnir? It looks bloody silly in that trailer.
the sad truth. and why did they make loki evil. he may be a Trickster but he is not evil.
also, he is odin's blood brother, and odin have Gungnir. why and how should loki kill him
Something as complex as a character who isn't one-dimensionally evil is too much for the target audience to handle. It gets too complicated.

I can imagine Loki somehow managing to kill Odin though, through some clever plot-device. He is a tricky one; after all he did do Baldur in.
to bad that the target audience need it to be good vs evil to Understand. because when you look at it objectively the áss/Æsir/aser or what you call them, is most of the time bigger pricks then the jötunn, see the story about how Asgard got it's wall (can't remember it's name) they had a deal an then the Æsir sabotaged the jötunn who was building it.
 

DalekJaas

New member
Dec 3, 2008
1,028
0
0
FredTheUndead said:
The Asylum's Sherlock Holmes is still the greatest film of all time.
Haha agreed! That movie is still the all round WORST movie I have ever seen.
 

Lord_Ascendant

New member
Jan 14, 2008
2,909
0
0
jurnag12 said:
Wait, "Hammer of Invincibility"?
When the hell did the name 'Mjolnir' get copyrighted?
Besides that, kinda looking forward to it, since all Asylum movies are good for a laugh.
I dunno, I think NAVSPECWEP has a patent on that....

/reference

~~~

I feel like "Syfy Original Movie" seems to be a synonym for "Low Budget, Probably Crap Movie Which May Or May Not Achieve A Degree Of Fame As Some Sort Of Internet Meme/Cult Status As "So-Bad-It's-Good" But Most Likely Not"

This goes way beyond Bearsharktopus.....

 

norwegian-guy

New member
Jan 17, 2011
266
0
0
Snake Plissken said:
norwegian-guy said:
Snake Plissken said:
I'm not terribly certain why everyone is mocking this. Have you guys SEEN that trailer for "actual" Thor film? It looks godawful...
Something tells me you have never seen an Asylum-movie. Their so bad it isn't even funny.
Oh, no, sir. I've seen ALL of the Asylum movies.
... are you into inflicting pain on yourself or something?
I could barely get through one when drunk. And the very idea of Titanic 2 is just flat out offensive.
 

Ziggy

New member
Jul 13, 2010
252
0
0
Blitzwing said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
I'm sort of disappointed that the summary decided to use the word 'armageddon' instead of Ragnarok...

And I, uh... what is this?
I thought it was just a sketch or a mock trailer, but apparently it isn't?
and hell instead of Niflheim
I sort of tolerated Hell, because it didn't sound too far from Hel, which after all is supposed to be located in Niflheim.
Hel is "the ruler" in Niflheim and is loki's daughter
Hel, the woman, rules over Hel, also called Helheim. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hel_%28realm%29
The same way that Hades rules over Hades.

Niflheim was one of the first locations to exist, along with Muspelheim.
The warm air from Muspelheim met the cold air from Niflheim in Gunningagap, and formed Yme.
and as amazing as is sounds, they still change it into... well you saw the trailer.
old religion and other old stuff are good enough. why do they fell the need to change it. if i go to a movie about norse mythology, i want it to be norse mythology.
I don't know if the target audience of Almighty Thor are very interested. They just want some action and a familiar setting.

Edit: Also, what's the deal with Mjolnir? It looks bloody silly in that trailer.
the sad truth. and why did they make loki evil. he may be a Trickster but he is not evil.
also, he is odin's blood brother, and odin have Gungnir. why and how should loki kill him
Something as complex as a character who isn't one-dimensionally evil is too much for the target audience to handle. It gets too complicated.

I can imagine Loki somehow managing to kill Odin though, through some clever plot-device. He is a tricky one; after all he did do Baldur in.
to bad that the target audience need it to be good vs evil to Understand. because when you look at it objectively the áss/Æsir/aser or what you call them, is most of the time bigger pricks then the jötunn, see the story about how Asgard got it's wall (can't remember it's name) they had a deal an then the Æsir sabotaged the jötunn who was building it.
In defense of the Esir the builders price was Freyja, the sun and the moon. That seems a bit unreasonable.
his demands were unreasonable, yes. but they made a deal fair and square, and if i remember correct, they killed hin in the end
 

Ziggy

New member
Jul 13, 2010
252
0
0
Blitzwing said:
ziggydk said:
Blitzwing said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
ziggydk said:
Jonluw said:
I'm sort of disappointed that the summary decided to use the word 'armageddon' instead of Ragnarok...

And I, uh... what is this?
I thought it was just a sketch or a mock trailer, but apparently it isn't?
and hell instead of Niflheim
I sort of tolerated Hell, because it didn't sound too far from Hel, which after all is supposed to be located in Niflheim.
Hel is "the ruler" in Niflheim and is loki's daughter
Hel, the woman, rules over Hel, also called Helheim. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hel_%28realm%29
The same way that Hades rules over Hades.

Niflheim was one of the first locations to exist, along with Muspelheim.
The warm air from Muspelheim met the cold air from Niflheim in Gunningagap, and formed Yme.
and as amazing as is sounds, they still change it into... well you saw the trailer.
old religion and other old stuff are good enough. why do they fell the need to change it. if i go to a movie about norse mythology, i want it to be norse mythology.
I don't know if the target audience of Almighty Thor are very interested. They just want some action and a familiar setting.

Edit: Also, what's the deal with Mjolnir? It looks bloody silly in that trailer.
the sad truth. and why did they make loki evil. he may be a Trickster but he is not evil.
also, he is odin's blood brother, and odin have Gungnir. why and how should loki kill him
Something as complex as a character who isn't one-dimensionally evil is too much for the target audience to handle. It gets too complicated.

I can imagine Loki somehow managing to kill Odin though, through some clever plot-device. He is a tricky one; after all he did do Baldur in.
to bad that the target audience need it to be good vs evil to Understand. because when you look at it objectively the áss/Æsir/aser or what you call them, is most of the time bigger pricks then the jötunn, see the story about how Asgard got it's wall (can't remember it's name) they had a deal an then the Æsir sabotaged the jötunn who was building it.
In defense of the Esir the builders price was Freyja, the sun and the moon. That seems a bit unreasonable.
his demands were unreasonable, yes. but they made a deal fair and square, and if i remember correct, they killed hin in the end
Yeah because they didn?t think he could actually do it in time besides it was Loki's fault he was the one that convinced them to let the builder use his horse.
"we didn't think you could actually do it" is not a good reason to sabotage him
 

TitenSxull

New member
Feb 17, 2009
29
0
0
And yet I'd rather see the Asylum version than the big budget one. The new THOR movie from Marvel Studios features an Australian actor shouting pompous dialogue about how he's a Norse god, all without even attempting to mask his accent. At least this version has the excuse of a low budget and no name actors.
 

lohac

Is Now A Hero
Nov 8, 2007
28
0
0
Titanic 2 had D.C. Douglas, though, so you could just imagine him throwing in Wesker lines at any moment for instant laughs. So there's no way Thor could top that, is there? ;)
 

legion431

New member
Mar 14, 2010
729
0
0
God that trailer was so bland and horrible. Not only that but it was also an extremely stupid choice to release the trailer just after Thor came out.