So, is this a discussion about the movie or CGI? Because I finally got round to seeing it (not showing much nowadays), and...yeah.
The movie isn't good, and I think a lot of it has to do with the source material. Thing is, the book, while I love it, is very much akin to a fable. It's a series of events that follow on from beginning to end, and since the book is written in-universe, we can pin the BFG as an unreliable narrator. The film is similar in that regard - a series of events rather than a traditional act structure - but I feel it doesn't work as well here. Come the end, I don't feel any of the characters have really changed by the end of it. Which might be fine, except there's certain plot points that are brought up, some not from the book at all, but fall flat. Such as:
-The film establishes that the giants were friendly once, but something changed. Why they changed is never explained.
-Fleshlumpeater is the only giant that's unaffected by the bad dream. This amounts to nothing, as the outcome at the end remains the same.
-Where the BFG briefly leaves Sophie behind at the orphenage due to guilt is a plot point that lasts about five minutes, and the plot point with the first boy feels redundant, and at worst, paints the BFG in an unflattering light. He knows what could happen to Sophie, yet takes her anyway, despite having witnessed the consequences of it firsthand.
-It's mentioned repeatedly that he never sees the golden-coloured dream much anymore. Why this is the case is never explained.
-Giants dislike water because...reasons.
-The BFG chases them out of his home with a brand. This character arc is never really resolved. It's part of one, but the giants are captured because of the military. True, he helps, but there's no sense of culmination for his actions.
-The giving the queen a nightmare sequence still feels redundant. There's a giant in your garden. That's proof enough. Though I will say that the palace scenes are easily the best in the movie.
-The style of dialogue really veers towards children sometimes. Not as bad as some other kid's movies, but it does feel very twee.
It could be that this is me watching the film as an adult, whereas I read the book as a child, but this feels..well, disposable. Not a bad film, but easily one of Spielberg's weakest films. I will say though that it looks excellent visually, in regards to the giants themselves, how giant country is realized, and the dreams themselves, along with their tree. I didn't get any uncanny valley moments at all. But, yeah. Not a bad film, but I could see this in my bottom 10 for this year, even tough 1-6 are already taken on that list.