Quoted for being right. Both times.shadowmagus said:Alright, I'm going to do this and probably end up getting banned for it, but I'll run it anyway.
1) Bob, have you ever considered that maybe this whole "fake geek girl" thing isn't directed at the women but the concept of what they are doing? Consider the fact that you have an entire subculture of people who for decades have been the butt of jokes, torment, and ridicule so much that we they made revenge movies for us, and now that said subculture is in the mainstream, they are not allowed to have some resentment towards people who are only getting into the scene to be "mainstream" and "with the times". You have said in your videos that you would side with Magneto if given super human abilities because of how you have been treated through life, yet you're ok with people coming and and simply pretending to like things? What if it was guys? My issue with it is that you're essentially white-knighting because these are women who are being "attacked". If it was guys, no one would turn a damn head.
2) Maybe the writers had supergirl getting into a number of social issues because, ya know, she's 15? That's what fifteen year old teenagers do, they get into trouble, over their head, test the waters etc. Again, not sexist, this is simply what happens.
There said my piece. Ban me, report me, do what you want, I won't be responding to this.
Heh, this is actually the reason the whole fake gamer girl thing really bugs me. I've never worked at a game store, but I've attended a lot of comic book conventions and a few gaming ones, and my sister who works in a comic shop said its even worse there. This idea that if I'm in a nerd space some (not all, not even most, but enough that it happens on average at least once per con day) guys feel it is their right - nay, duty - to come over and demand answers of me to prove my geek cred. And the whole fake geek girl thing? It gives those people the feeling that not only is what they're doing when they come grill me and appoint themselves judge of my answers *right*, but actually encourages it as some sort of social gift to the rest of nerddom.Beautiful End said:Actually! That's another great point I forgot to mention! Guys alienate girls too! Or at least that has happened to me a lot. Every time I'm talking to a customer about, let's say, Dragon Age (A game which I love), most GUY customers feel the need to play 20 questions with me. "What's the name of the ogre guy?" "How does it end?" "Who do you choose who's the new king of Ferelden?" "What are all the origin stories?". So I have to be reaaaaally careful about my words around guys. If I say "I like Halo", oh, boy, people start question me. Then I might reply with a "Well, I like playing with my friends. I don't care much about the story. FPS are not my specialty" and then I might get one of those "Shows how much YOU know!" looks.
What I'm saying is that guys are also pretty defensive about geek girls. They feel the need to approve or authenticate their status. Why can't they just say "Gamer girl? Alright, sounds believable". I mean, what's so weird about it? And this might go back to the original "Fake geek girls" problem. So I stand by what I said: the problem is that it's just annoying. So we should all just stop trying to annoy each other and let each other be. We're on the same side, aren't we?
Because the days of geekdom being a place only reachable through suffering is now long gone, as simple as that. It is now acceptable to be a nerd, so anyone can try it without repercussions, anyone can try it out for a while without becoming a social outcast. This opens up our world for dilettantes or amateurs, some might even stay, or reach more complex levels of nerd. This includes "cool people."Newblisk said:I'm so tired of being told to shut up and eat it by people i respect. Yes the fake geek girl thing isn't that big a deal, but why are you telling me to shut up and be happy that the "cool people" have decided to grace us with their presence? why should they have a safe and comfortable ride into the world we had given up so much for? I don't have a problem with anyone being a part of anything they enjoy, i do however have a problem being told "it's a win" for me too because it isn't.
First jim, now bob. both intelligent, entertaining men and completely unable to take a step back from the "girl in trouble" window to get a better view of the big picture.
MovieBob said:Original Geek Girl
In this installment MovieBob shows us the creation of Supergirl.
Watch Video
because it is, it came from the war on women thing (that i remind everyone was started because some horny ***** didnt want to shell out 10 bucks for condoms and wanted taxpayers to pay for birth control...so much for wanting the fed out of their vagina) that the media has been using as political ammo to antagonize (mostly) the right. And then somehow some one brought it up and thought it related to nerd culture....when in actuality the only reason this is seen as a problem is when its a marketing gimmick.Rack said:Wait does anyone really give a crap about the fake geek girl thing? I assumed it was all just a media construct.
Last I checked the maturity, wisdom and self discipline of teenage children, and adult's observations of those things, has always been the same in America. BOOM, non-answer to a non-answer.MegaManOfNumbers said:Last I checked, 1950s America is pretty different, culturally, than 21st century America.90sgamer said:Damn Bob, you sure are going on a moral crusade about sexism lately and no straw is out of your reach. It's entirely possible that a 15 year old girl is expected to lack wisdom, maturity and self discipline because... that's what most or all 15 year old people tend to lack. But no, no, no, it's because the writers are SEXIST.
I do not know whether 15 year old boys were attacked with the same "vehemency" as 15 year old girls in comics during that time frame; and if they were not, as you claim, then I do not know why that would be. Either way, it's not relevant to the question of why writers wrote an accurate portrayal of the behavior expected of a 15 year old of any gender, but who happened to be a girl.Sylocat said:Then why aren't 15-year-old boys attacked with equal vehemency?90sgamer said:Damn Bob, you sure are going on a moral crusade about sexism lately and no straw is out of your reach. It's entirely possible that a 15 year old girl is expected to lack wisdom, maturity and self discipline because... that's what most or all 15 year old people tend to lack. But no, no, no, it's because the writers are SEXIST.
Ah, deterrence. Well played, Reagan.90sgamer said:Last I checked the maturity, wisdom and self discipline of teenage children, and adult's observations of those things, has always been the same in America. BOOM, non-answer to a non-answer.MegaManOfNumbers said:Last I checked, 1950s America is pretty different, culturally, than 21st century America.90sgamer said:Damn Bob, you sure are going on a moral crusade about sexism lately and no straw is out of your reach. It's entirely possible that a 15 year old girl is expected to lack wisdom, maturity and self discipline because... that's what most or all 15 year old people tend to lack. But no, no, no, it's because the writers are SEXIST.
Even assuming you're gonna blame anyone, not that I would, how is it that "actors" get to dodge responsibility and have marketing execs take the blame? No one forced them to do it, stop trying to find the nearest guy to blame.Invadergray said:But they're just actors. Instead of going after the girls, you need to go after the men who put her there. Those marketing execs (who are largely male) are the ones who are hijacking the culture to turn a profit, not the girls themselves.