So I just went to the grocery store, saw some chaps smoking outside and I thought to myself about the Pokemon Koffing. We all know Koffing right? That lovable little ball of smog, generally he's portrayed as a happy joyful creature. He smiles. His own battle cry is enthusiastically saying his name "KOFFING!"
Yet when this pokemon evolves into Weezing... It's not only portrayed as unhappy and sickly, as it's name applies it can barely breathe.
Now if we're thinking of these things as actual creatures instead of sprites/stats, can we say it is at all ethical to allow Koffing to his stronger form that doubles as it's personal hell? Because trainers do have a say in the evolutionary process of pokemon, they can cancel it on command by pressing the B button.
Personally I think it's overtly cruel and selfish of any trainer to evolve Koffing. I'm wondering if anyone disagrees and/or can think of another pokemon who's evolution hinders them as oppose to helps them?
I suppose, in an inverse of this, any trainer that doesn't evolve their Psyduck as quickly as possible as complete monsters, as the thing is suffering from horrific headaches.
Yet when this pokemon evolves into Weezing... It's not only portrayed as unhappy and sickly, as it's name applies it can barely breathe.
Now if we're thinking of these things as actual creatures instead of sprites/stats, can we say it is at all ethical to allow Koffing to his stronger form that doubles as it's personal hell? Because trainers do have a say in the evolutionary process of pokemon, they can cancel it on command by pressing the B button.
Personally I think it's overtly cruel and selfish of any trainer to evolve Koffing. I'm wondering if anyone disagrees and/or can think of another pokemon who's evolution hinders them as oppose to helps them?
I suppose, in an inverse of this, any trainer that doesn't evolve their Psyduck as quickly as possible as complete monsters, as the thing is suffering from horrific headaches.