You kidding me? I love those games.tormut2 said:The lego star wars series, I have no idea why i invested in that series twice
I guess this goes to show how few people here have really played properly terrible games.
You kidding me? I love those games.tormut2 said:The lego star wars series, I have no idea why i invested in that series twice
you're talking about WAW and MW2Gizmo007666 said:I have no problem with you thinking either of these two are bad games and recon you must be pretty lucky for these to be you're worst two that you've ever played but please don't make up stuff. Higher players do not get better weapons or perks than the lower levels in any of the CoDs from 4 through Blops.Mikeyfell said:secondly higher level players get better guns and perks
what the fuck?
once you have proved that you're better than everyone else we'll give you some good guns and perks.
so the good get better while the bad get repeatedly slaughtered and demoralized?
(even if I was good enough to be a level 70 with the bullet-proof-infinite-ammo-double-damage-instant-kill perk I'd still think it was a bull shit system, a fair challenge is better than domination)
in Halo there are 7 perks and none of them are any better than the others. Which are "the best" comes down to player preference.
in CoD there are a shit ton of perks and about 5 or so that can totally make you invulnerable if you're good enough to have unlocked them.
anyway, I can't decide whether Modern Warfare is worse than Black Ops or not
4 - Widely regarded as the best guns were M16 and mp5, both available from the start.
WaW - mp40 is available from level 10
MW2 - ump and scar available from start / early on.
Blops - famas and ak-74u both unlocked in the first 20 odd levels, so is a bit farther than the others but hardly unlocking the bfg's at level 65 or anything.
As for perks 4 and WaW the key ones were stopping power and juggernaut, unlocked from the start. MW2 was stopping power unlocked from the start. Blops, arguable which is best but as soon as you can create a class you can choose which perk to unlock.
OT: Croc 2 I guess... might be something worse out there that I've successfully repressed the memory of it.
EDIT: Oh FF2, wtf was that level system like? Really thought it was terrible.
That can NOT be the worst game you have ever played. Come on, Superman 64? E.T.? Sonic Riders? Two Worlds? It has to be an actually bad game to count. Surely you have played worse.tormut2 said:The lego star wars series, I have no idea why i invested in that series twice
BLOPS has zombies.....Mikeyfell said:you're talking about WAW and MW2Gizmo007666 said:I have no problem with you thinking either of these two are bad games and recon you must be pretty lucky for these to be you're worst two that you've ever played but please don't make up stuff. Higher players do not get better weapons or perks than the lower levels in any of the CoDs from 4 through Blops.Mikeyfell said:secondly higher level players get better guns and perks
what the fuck?
once you have proved that you're better than everyone else we'll give you some good guns and perks.
so the good get better while the bad get repeatedly slaughtered and demoralized?
(even if I was good enough to be a level 70 with the bullet-proof-infinite-ammo-double-damage-instant-kill perk I'd still think it was a bull shit system, a fair challenge is better than domination)
in Halo there are 7 perks and none of them are any better than the others. Which are "the best" comes down to player preference.
in CoD there are a shit ton of perks and about 5 or so that can totally make you invulnerable if you're good enough to have unlocked them.
anyway, I can't decide whether Modern Warfare is worse than Black Ops or not
4 - Widely regarded as the best guns were M16 and mp5, both available from the start.
WaW - mp40 is available from level 10
MW2 - ump and scar available from start / early on.
Blops - famas and ak-74u both unlocked in the first 20 odd levels, so is a bit farther than the others but hardly unlocking the bfg's at level 65 or anything.
As for perks 4 and WaW the key ones were stopping power and juggernaut, unlocked from the start. MW2 was stopping power unlocked from the start. Blops, arguable which is best but as soon as you can create a class you can choose which perk to unlock.
OT: Croc 2 I guess... might be something worse out there that I've successfully repressed the memory of it.
EDIT: Oh FF2, wtf was that level system like? Really thought it was terrible.
I'm talking about MW 1 and Black Ops
WaW had a (fun) zombie mode so I could play that on line after I finished the single player
and MW2 had the Spec Ops missions so I could play those after the single player
so I never even bothered to play the competitive multiplayer in either of those games
it's the myriad of only slightly different weapons that get on my nerves
it really doesn't matter if those 2 guns are the best because there are half a million guns that all look the same at a glance and when you're taking bullets all you have is a glance
(if you don't mind) in Halo the Needler is pink, the DMR is a scoped rifle
in Black Ops the AK-74u is shaped like a gun along with every other gun in black ops
if you try all the different combos to find out which works best for you you'll spend more time on the 'build a class' screen than you would playing
(or I would anyway, the way my head attracts bullets)
and that might all be worth it if they could match the skill levels appropriately
but I'm always up against people who can beat Veteran with their eyes closed
Thank you. Someone that actually shares my opinion that portal and halflife 2 were shit!Legion IV said:Engage in hyperbole much?
OP: Portal, Halflife 2 and big rigs but hell at least big rigs was hilariously bad. i regreat buying portal and halflife.
I liked Haze...Joseph375 said:NeedAUserName said:Turok or Haze, in that they had such hype, and both were just complete pieces of shit. Hell, calling them that is an insult to shit, they were everything wrong with the world squeezed onto two CDs.
Cookie for the reference
I've never tried Haze, is it really that bad?
Totally agree.roger moores eyebrow said:Stalker Clear Sky was a crapfest as well, especially disappointing seeing as I love the orginal and Call of Pripyat.
I played CoD4's multiplayer and only got to level thirty-something, I had an absolute blast on it personally.Joshimodo said:CoD4's multiplayer was fun for about 10 minutes, then you realised it was just a grind to get overpowered weapons to beat people who didn't have to time to unlock it. Too easy, and unbalanced.SextusMaximus said:CoD4's multiplayer, CoD5's campaign + multiplayer + zombies, CoD6's Spec Ops + CoD7's Campaign + Zombies.
WaW's campaign was a joke, and while zombies was ok, other games did it better, first. No redeeming features or interesting parts.
Spec Ops was dire. Same problems as all of the CoD campaigns - Linear, set occurrences, dull AI and pretty much only one way to do things. Yawn.
Black Ops campaign is better than MW2 and WaW's, but it's still retarded. Terrible. Zombies has the same problem as before, with no real improvements.
Terrible series.
I was talking about all of them actually. The point you made was that the best perks and weapons are available only for the highest levelled players and I was pointing out all the overpowered/overused weapons and perks are those that are available from the start.Mikeyfell said:you're talking about WAW and MW2Gizmo007666 said:I have no problem with you thinking either of these two are bad games and recon you must be pretty lucky for these to be you're worst two that you've ever played but please don't make up stuff. Higher players do not get better weapons or perks than the lower levels in any of the CoDs from 4 through Blops.Mikeyfell said:secondly higher level players get better guns and perks
what the fuck?
once you have proved that you're better than everyone else we'll give you some good guns and perks.
so the good get better while the bad get repeatedly slaughtered and demoralized?
(even if I was good enough to be a level 70 with the bullet-proof-infinite-ammo-double-damage-instant-kill perk I'd still think it was a bull shit system, a fair challenge is better than domination)
in Halo there are 7 perks and none of them are any better than the others. Which are "the best" comes down to player preference.
in CoD there are a shit ton of perks and about 5 or so that can totally make you invulnerable if you're good enough to have unlocked them.
anyway, I can't decide whether Modern Warfare is worse than Black Ops or not
4 - Widely regarded as the best guns were M16 and mp5, both available from the start.
WaW - mp40 is available from level 10
MW2 - ump and scar available from start / early on.
Blops - famas and ak-74u both unlocked in the first 20 odd levels, so is a bit farther than the others but hardly unlocking the bfg's at level 65 or anything.
As for perks 4 and WaW the key ones were stopping power and juggernaut, unlocked from the start. MW2 was stopping power unlocked from the start. Blops, arguable which is best but as soon as you can create a class you can choose which perk to unlock.
OT: Croc 2 I guess... might be something worse out there that I've successfully repressed the memory of it.
EDIT: Oh FF2, wtf was that level system like? Really thought it was terrible.
I'm talking about MW 1 and Black Ops
WaW had a (fun) zombie mode so I could play that on line after I finished the single player
and MW2 had the Spec Ops missions so I could play those after the single player
so I never even bothered to play the competitive multiplayer in either of those games
it's the myriad of only slightly different weapons that get on my nerves
it really doesn't matter if those 2 guns are the best because there are half a million guns that all look the same at a glance and when you're taking bullets all you have is a glance
(if you don't mind) in Halo the Needler is pink, the DMR is a scoped rifle
in Black Ops the AK-74u is shaped like a gun along with every other gun in black ops
if you try all the different combos to find out which works best for you you'll spend more time on the 'build a class' screen than you would playing
(or I would anyway, the way my head attracts bullets)
and that might all be worth it if they could match the skill levels appropriately
but I'm always up against people who can beat Veteran with their eyes closed
*Standing ovation*nomis101uk said::O OMG. I just died a little inside! That's my favourite game ever!! And I didn't actually play it until 2010, yet it still managed to impress me that much, that it knocked Deus Ex off the top spot.OT: Final Fantasy 9, I guess. The game's story was bland and ridiculous, the art style was.. Horrid, and the characters were nothing but irritating twats.
Seriously, I think for so many people FF7 was their introduction to the series or least what defined it for them, so that when 9 came along, for them it wasn't what Final Fantasy was about. But in reality, 9 was a throwback to what Final Fantasy was supposed to be in terms of world and characters. The creator of the series said after making it that 9 was the game that most captured what he felt Final Fantasy was always meant to be, and therefore was his favourite. The sci-fi settings of 7 & 8 were actually the real deviation from series, not the other way round.
Also I think because 7 was such a quantum leap, by the time 9 came around it was just more of the same. A "safe" game that didn't change anything. But for me, it was perfection.
It had a good concept going for it...John-Doe said:The worst one i can remember playing from recent memory was a game called legendary. Just absolutely god awful mess of a game.
alright so there are good perks at low levelsGizmo007666 said:snip
yes BLOPS did have zombies but it wasn't funIvan Torres said:BLOPS has zombies.....Mikeyfell said:WaW had a (fun) zombie mode so I could play that on line after I finished the single player
Sorry, my bad. I never owned the thing, so I wasn't entirely sure.Stryc9 said:Action 52 was on the NES and later the Genesis not the 2600.Chiyo-Chan said:Action 52 on the Atari 2600...
...Yes, I was that curious.