infohippie said:
I feel much the same. 2011's Conan was a lot of fun, full of blood and swords, old gods, evil sorceresses, some humour. Mamoa's Conan was definitely much closer to the Conan of the books than Arnie's ever was. I don't know what people were expecting.
Well, at least for me I love the original Conan mostly for the sheer cheese factor, and that's what Arnie offered. The feeling I got from the trailer was anything but the feeling the original movie gave me. Gone was the low-poly grossness, embodied well in Conan himself; what made Arnie as Conan so awesome to me is that the movie never really showed him off as such.
Conan wasn't cool, Conan was brutal, a crude and quiet man. But the 2011 version is all swanky fighting moves, CGI enemies and slow motion look-at-how-cool-this-is-ness. And that ain't what I love in Conan the Barbarian, I love it for its crudeness. The whole movie felt like that, it all felt decaying and crude yet hedonistic.
Or to put it visually, it's the difference between this:
and this:
To put it audibly, the difference between this:
and this:
It might be a subtle thing in the music perhaps, but in a way I do believe that there's something there. I think it's the spirit of the times, I'm not sure you could even make a Conan movie these days that could recapture that feeling we had in the old one.
Then again, Mad Max: Fury Road came along and look at how well that did. But that had the original visionary behind the wheel (hah).