Umm....That question wasn't aimed at you. It was rhetorical and more or less aimed at the creators of these so called "Realistic shooters."Alusin86 said:
The Unrealistic MW2 Thread
- Thread starter Alusin86
- Start date
When you get shot fatally, you don't go flying backwards and give the other person points, depending on the gun you may have a minute or two of life before you collapse.
The ranges in the game are absurdly short.
The ranges in the game are absurdly short.
the spawning system is just as realistic as if barney was running around with a barret. and the sniper rifles r not realistic either. i still think its a great game, but nt realistic. but who wants to play a fully realistic game? if it was completely realisic, youd get shot once, then spend six months in the hospital.
I say fuck realism. It makes it less fun. Just don't say you're trying to be realistic when you don't make it real. It's like saying the events of Halo are actually going to happen.
This times a gajillion!JWRosser said:
On a related note, even though it would make a bad game, a single bullet to the gut should do a whole lot more.
1. The FN FAL is a selective fire rifle, this makes it fully automatic (I thinks)
2. The L86 LSW is the A1 version, this version was pulled out of service and wouldn't remain at the time the game is set in. And it would be impossible for the Spetsnaz to gain control of them as they're only issued to the British Army and Cadet Forces
3. A Barret M82 would be extremley heavy and hard to sprint with.
4. It would be impossible to fire a Javelin from a standing position without your spine curling over from the kickback.
5. The Glock 18 isn't a machine pistol, it's a semi-automatic handgun used by law inforcement units.
Anymore you want?
Edit: I can go on about the LSW so I'll leave on 4:
1) BIGGY! It's not an LMG, it's a Assault Rifle, just with a longer barrel for increased accuary.
2) The barrel is completly different. On MW2, it's just a big black tube, but this is how it actually looks
[spoilers]
[/spoilers]
3) The magazine used is hardly issued to soldiers to them being about £120 each.
4) Finally, the SUSAT scope in MW2, is completely different to the one used in service by all forces (RM, RN, RA, TA, RAF)
(Btw, I'm an UK Army Cadet, that's why I know all the stuff on the LSW)
2. The L86 LSW is the A1 version, this version was pulled out of service and wouldn't remain at the time the game is set in. And it would be impossible for the Spetsnaz to gain control of them as they're only issued to the British Army and Cadet Forces
3. A Barret M82 would be extremley heavy and hard to sprint with.
4. It would be impossible to fire a Javelin from a standing position without your spine curling over from the kickback.
5. The Glock 18 isn't a machine pistol, it's a semi-automatic handgun used by law inforcement units.
Anymore you want?
Edit: I can go on about the LSW so I'll leave on 4:
1) BIGGY! It's not an LMG, it's a Assault Rifle, just with a longer barrel for increased accuary.
2) The barrel is completly different. On MW2, it's just a big black tube, but this is how it actually looks
[spoilers]
3) The magazine used is hardly issued to soldiers to them being about £120 each.
4) Finally, the SUSAT scope in MW2, is completely different to the one used in service by all forces (RM, RN, RA, TA, RAF)
(Btw, I'm an UK Army Cadet, that's why I know all the stuff on the LSW)
You could call it the most unrealistic fps of all time. I mean, when you think about it, Halo is much more likely to be accurate than mw2 is. I mean its in the future and all, but who is to say you that stuff wont be possible in the future.
But your friend is a moron, its is an Arcade shooter, not a realistic sim. That's like saying Burnout is the most accurate driving game ever. He doesn't even know what a realistic shooter is. Get him to play Arma 2 or Operation flashpoint or something, at least they don't try to be arcade-ish. 20 bucks says he finds them 'boring' because he can't sprint and snipe and survive.
But your friend is a moron, its is an Arcade shooter, not a realistic sim. That's like saying Burnout is the most accurate driving game ever. He doesn't even know what a realistic shooter is. Get him to play Arma 2 or Operation flashpoint or something, at least they don't try to be arcade-ish. 20 bucks says he finds them 'boring' because he can't sprint and snipe and survive.
Modern Warfare 2? Realistic? WHAT?! Noone should be able to dual fire shotguns without breaking their wrists.
Get your friend to play ArmA, or hell, Red Orchestra. Those are more realistic than MW will ever be.
Get your friend to play ArmA, or hell, Red Orchestra. Those are more realistic than MW will ever be.
Silencers. Of what little I know, I believe a silencer wears out over time, making it uneffective.
And also, how come no-ones mentioned killstreaks yet?
Of course, in war, when you kill 25 people, you're allowed to launch a nuclear attack!
And also, how come no-ones mentioned killstreaks yet?
Of course, in war, when you kill 25 people, you're allowed to launch a nuclear attack!
A bullet to chest will make you flinch and probably unable to retaliate instantly. Bullets tend to be painful.Zenode said:
In real life, if you're wounded you probably fall over not get blood all over your eyes and breathe heavily until you feel better.