Themes in Watchmen - Dr Manhattan

thejboy88

New member
Aug 29, 2010
1,515
0
0
This is something I?ve been wanting to do for some time. I will admit that I never really heard of the Watchmen series until the recent live-action film was marketed. But after watching both the film and the comics they were adapted from, I was obsessed. There were just so many themes and ideas and issues presented in this series to talk about and think about.

Now of course this discussion will contain spoilers for both the comics and film, so you have been warned.

Before we start I would like to admit that I am merely a fan of the series and the stuff I?m about to talk about has probably been said a hundred time before by a hundred people who are far more qualified to talk about this stuff than me. Nevertheless this is my take on these issues and I will try to give it my best shot.

But if you think these things have been done better by others, then I apologise in advance.

Firstly, we will discuss the issues surrounding the one lone superhuman in the series:

Dr Manhattan.

For those of you unfamiliar, Dr Manhattan began life as Jon Osterman, the son of a clockmaker in an alternate version of history where costumed crime-fighters had existed. After graduating from university he became part of the world?s early attempts at nuclear physics departments. One day he was locked inside one of the devices there and was torn apart by radiation. Later on he is able to reconstruct himself and now had godlike abilities.

There is very little that this character cannot do. He can teleport, create things almost out of thin air and we even get hints that he can create life in some form. He is, for all intents and purposes, a god among men.

Now a character with godlike abilities would raise plenty of issues by itself, but Manhattan is also an asset of the United States, developing new technologies and participating in the Vietnam War, which was won for the USA in this world because of him.

The first thing I?d like to discuss with this character is the notion that if he is a character with godlike ability, or even a god itself, then he was one created by humankind and it?s creations. This raises the issue I have long held to be true. That the divine is a creation not of powers above, but something we as humans have made for ourselves and convinced ourselves is true. ?God made by humans? instead of ?humans made by god?.

Godlike power and knowledge opens up many moral discussions but the biggest one of all as far as I am concerned is whether or not such a character as Manhattan can even be subject to morality like the rest of us.

Consider. We draw our morality from the powers that be. Our religions, our governments, our families. Morality is something which is inherently given to us by those above. Now obviously we consider morality a good thing and I?d never say otherwise, regardless of who gives it to us. But Manhattan has none above him. He is essentially all-powerful. What reason does he have to follow any sense of morality at all? He can?t be threatened, or coerced or manipulated.

Also, a bit off-topic here but, as I have stated many times in posts like these, I am an atheist. I do not believe in god. However, if I DID believe and was asked by other atheists or intellectuals why an all-powerful and all-knowing god would allow the world?s tragedies to occur, my answer would be simple:

?He doesn?t care.?

God, if he truly existed as people describe, would probably have the same attitude towards human as Dr Manhattan does. A being who is so far above and beyond everyone like us that he simply cannot connect to us on any level. It?s like when you walk through a park and step on an ant, or blade of grass. You never give those things a moment?s thought. Because you, as a human, are so my greater, bigger and more powerful than those things beneath you that their end would not move you to any degree.

Which brings me back to our discussion regarding Manhattan and morality. Manhattan is a person who is so far beyond the things we can understand that morality, at least our kind of morality, would have no bearing on him. If he were to, on a whim, wipe out an entire city of people, it would not matter to him. It would be like one of us stepping on an ant hill. It?s a matter of scale. To us, stepping on an ant hill would not move us because we know of the ?big picture?, the world around us and the more important things in it. But him? He sees the ?bigger picture?, the whole universe and beyond. He understands that in the truly grand scheme of things, it probably wouldn?t matter of the whole human race vanished, because we are just one tiny blue world in a vast wondrous universe.

Now fans of the series will be quick to defend his actions at this time. You see, Manhattan has the power to see into the future and know exactly what will happen and when. No variation, no choice in the matter, if he see what he?s supposed to do he will do it. So his lack of interest in humanity could be attributed not to genuine apathy, but to his merely playing out the script.

But even taking this into account, we have no attempt on his part to even try and defy this so-called ?set future?. Has he tried in the past and failed? Has he given up on the prospect of a future you shape for yourselves? We never get any answers to these questions but it does give us a very interesting situation. Dr Manhattan, the closest thing to a god any mortal person will ever experience in this fictional world, is just as powerless as the rest of us and is, when constrained by the set history before him, little more than a puppet.

Well, that?s about everything I have to say on this character. I hope you all weren?t too bored reading all this.

Next time I will be discussing the issues surrounding the character of Rorschach.

P.s: I wasn?t quite sure which section of the forums to put this discussion in so if you think it belongs somewhere else, please let me know.
 

Scorched_Cascade

Innocence proves nothing
Sep 26, 2008
1,399
0
0
I never really liked Dr Manhatten. He is just too alien to like. As you say he made no attempt to change the future which when you consider his powers seems either: a) outright malicious or b) apathetic.

I also didn't understand how humans lying caught him out (with the whole he causes cancer thing). Why in all 46 years of his researching his own powers, would he not discover a cancer risk by his own super mental abilities. Considering he points out himself several times that his intellect is towering and beyond both mortal and AI comprehension. Why doesn't he just cure it?

Then I began to think what if his powers arn't limitless? While he doesn't have the same restraints the rest of us have what if hes bound by different rules?

p.s Excuse any glaring errors I'm more of a V for Vendetta (comic) kinda guy

p.p.s:I reckon this might belong in user reviews but that often has less of a turn out
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
He doesn't have the ability to see into the future in the comics. He exists at all points in time in his life at the same time. It's probably to subtle of a difference for most to grasp.

As for morality, well he was once human so it's whatever the writers care for.

Now trying to compare it to divine being of a religion... Most older religions have very human like gods, with the same basic desires and motivations as people, but grand powers to go along with it. Christian god however is another story. This god aloof, does not dwell with his people and only rarely intervenes, then promise not to after the new covenant is made. This god is mostly described as all knowing and all powerful. Basically so far above people that thinking you can understand the motivations and desires of the being is foolish.

So there you go, you couldn't even apply human concepts of good and evil, morality, justice, etc to a being of that magnitude, unless you just look at the actions from a human point of view.
 

Scorched_Cascade

Innocence proves nothing
Sep 26, 2008
1,399
0
0
manaman said:
He doesn't have the ability to see into the future in the comics. He exists at all points in time in his life at the same time. It's probably to subtle of a difference for most to grasp.
That is because the distinction is brain melting. Even if he only lived a longish human life (e.g 100 years) he'd be seeing 3,155,673,600 different scenes all at the same time. That isn't even taking into account that he has a faster reaction time and thinks faster which would mean he is probably seeing all the fractions of milliseconds in his life rather than seconds. (Assuming my maths is right 100years is 36 524 days is 876576 hours is 52594560 minutes is 3,155,673,600 seconds).

This is ignoring the fact that he is supposedly immortal and so could have billions of years ahead of him instead of just 100.

How he stays sane let alone able to function is astounding.

Oh wow when I read the captcha I thought it said "Serial killer" maybe time to go head to a police station.
 

caselj01

New member
Jun 8, 2010
139
0
0
thejboy88 said:
But even taking this into account, we have no attempt on his part to even try and defy this so-called 'set future'. Has he tried in the past and failed?
Maybe he tried in the past and succeeded?
 

Daaaah Whoosh

New member
Jun 23, 2010
1,041
0
0
Despite what you say about Manhattan, I don't believe he was apathetic. He had two relationships with women in his new form, which proves that he can show love. He was even glad when Silk Spectre got with Nite Owl. In my opinion, God would be like this. He wants us to be happy, but he's not totally against stuff going wrong, because it makes life more interesting. Like the Comedian getting the first Silk Spectre pregnant.

Spoiler alert.
 

Flatfrog

New member
Dec 29, 2010
885
0
0
At work so I can't spend much time on this, but I just want to take issue with this bit:

thejboy88 said:
Consider. We draw our morality from the powers that be. Our religions, our governments, our families. Morality is something which is inherently given to us by those above.
I don't think this is really true. I think morality is something we've mostly inherited from our evolutionary past - it's a codifying of a core set of human instincts towards group bonding, built on by evolving social norms and only referred to moral authority figures (religion, philosophy, law) for the difficult fringe cases. There have been lots of studies showing that religious morality is derived from actual ethics, not the other way round - there's a good simple analysis of this in The God Delusion.
 

Fangface74

Lock 'n' Load
Feb 22, 2008
595
0
0
I think it's important to remember that he didn't earn the powers, it was like, 'POOF! Your mega powerful!', he had to learn to BE what he had become. And as a scientist the best approach he knew of was logical,methodical and 'cold'. In short, he CHOSE the godlike demeanour and aloofness.

Even though he now views the world at the sub-atomic level, emotions are still just as much a mystery to him as they are everyone else, in a way it's worse for him as he was a geeky scientist who only ever enjoyed one relationship. He still feels emotion so he shouldn't really cop out on the god trip (I'm sure reconstructing yourself with a six-pack is purely coincidental). It's not like he's totally an incompatible species, he has sex which means physical needs still exist, and though he struggles with the emotional side...who doesn't?

He only ever enjoyed social success at the behest of others, left to his own devices he wouldn't really flourish at all, becoming blue and powerful has created that very situation which again, he cops out on the 'I'm all powerful and your aren't, you wouldn't get it, because I don't get you'.

I think a nerd got powers that let him ignore and enforce his insecurities.